Skip to main content

Management of Malignant Pericardial Effusions

  • Chapter
Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

The optimal treatment of patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion remains controversial. The goals of treatment are complete drainage of the effusion and acquisition of tissue and fluid for pathological analysis and microbiologic culture. Ideally, this should be performed using a method with minimal morbidity and a low risk for recurrence of the effusion. Therapeutic options include pericardiocentesis, percutaneous catheter drainage, open subxiphoid pericardial drainage (with or without the creation of a pericardioperitoneal window), and transthoracic drainage with creation of a pericardiopleural window. The choice of drainage procedure is significantly influenced by the physiological reserve of the patient and the need for a definitive diagnosis of the cause of the effusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becit N, Unlu Y, Ceviz M, Kocogullari CU, Kocak H, Gurlertop Y. Subxiphoid pericardiostomy in the management of pericardial effusions: case series analysis of 368 patients. Heart 2005;91:785–790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Hayes SN, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of significant pericardial effusions following cardiothoracic surgery and outcomes of echo-guided pericardiocentesis for management: Mayo Clinic experience, 1979–1998. Chest 1999;116:322–331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE. Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 2. Chest 2005;128:1766–1781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Girardi LN, Ginsberg RJ, Burt ME. Pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial sclerosis: effective therapy for malignant pericardial effusions. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1422–1427; discussion 1427—1428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cullinane CA, Paz IB, Smith D, Carter N, Grannis FW Jr. Prognostic factors in the surgical management of pericardial effusion in the patient with concurrent malignancy. Chest 2004;125:1328–1334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsang TS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK, et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:429–436.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald JM, Meyers BF, Guthrie TJ, Battafarano RJ, Cooper JD, Patterson GA. Comparison of open subxiphoid pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for symptomatic pericardial effusion. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:811–815; discussion 816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsang TS, Seward JB, Barnes ME, et al. Outcomes of primary and secondary treatment of pericardial effusion in patients with malignancy. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:248–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee PJ, Mallik R. Cardiovascular effects of radiation therapy: practical approach to radiation therapy-induced heart disease. Cardiol Rev 2005;13:80–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moores DW, Allen KB, Faber LP, et al. Subxiphoid pericardial drainage for pericardial tamponade. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:546–551; discussion 551–552.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dosios T, Theakos N, Angouras D, Asimacopoulos P. Risk factors affecting the survival of patients with pericardial effusion submitted to subxiphoid pericardiostomy. Chest 2003;124:242–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen KB, Faber LP, Warren WH, Shaar CJ. Pericardial effusion: subxiphoid pericardiostomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:437–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Georghiou GP, Stamler A, Sharoni E, et al. Videoassisted thoracoscopic pericardial window for diagnosis and management of pericardial effusions. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:607–610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veeramachaneni, N.K., Battafarano, R.J. (2007). Management of Malignant Pericardial Effusions. In: Ferguson, M.K. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-474-8_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-474-8_59

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-384-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-474-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics