Skip to main content

Reading Eye Movements, Macro-structure and Comprehension Processes

  • Chapter
Processing of Visible Language

Part of the book series: Nato Conference Series ((HF,volume 13))

Abstract

Sentences usually are not read in isolation. They must be related to the ideas expressed in other sentences in order for a reader to comprehend the passage as a whole. These comprehension processes were analyzed by measuring eye movements while subjects read an 1888 word narrative text. Measures of reading rate per sentence supported the idea that reading eye movements are influenced by comprehension processes that link sentential conceptual units together to form higher-order conceptual units (macro-propositions). On the strength of this finding, the present more global measure of reading eye movements was offered as an alternative to the currently popular fine-grain analysis. According to the procedures outlined in this paper, a strict moment-to-moment link between language processes and eye movements is not required for eye movements to be a useful tool for analyzing comprehension processes during reading. One of the practical applications of this approach is the possibility that the analysis of comprehension processes during reading will shed new light on the differences between average and superior readers. Results were presented to support this possibility, especially for those differences that relate to active, flexible reading.

Despite rapid developments in other areas of communication, skillful reading remains essential in education and is highly rewarded in modern society. Consequently, many people possessing only average reading ability are turning to “speed reading” courses that promise both an increased reading rate and an improved comprehension. Unfortunately, the success of these courses is dubious (cf. Gibson & Levin, 1975). Superior readers do exist, but most of them develop without special instruction. It is unlikely that teaching at this advanced level will improve until more is learned about how superior readers function. This is unlikely to happen until the emphasis of reading research is shifted from the processes of recognition to the processes of comprehension. To date, the majority of research on reading has focused on the processes of recognition. Thus, we know a good deal about how children and adults learn to recognize letters, syllables, words, and even sentences. Some of the knowledge gained through this research has been of practical value in the teaching of reading and the correction of various reading deficiencies. However, since this research has not dealt with reading as a whole, it has told us very little about the differences between average and highly skilled readers. While it is true that readers must recognize symbols, the central objective in reading is to comprehend the writer’s message. Therefore, research on the comprehension processes may shed light on some aspects of reading which are not understood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J.R., & Bower, G.H. Human associative memory. Washington, DC: V.H. Winston, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, H., & de Voogd, A.H. On the control of eye saccades in reading. Vision Research, 1974, 14, 273–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., & Smiley, S.S. Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buswell, G.T. An experimental study of eye-voice span in reading. Supplementary Education Monographs, 1920, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. Reading comprehension as eyes see it. In M. Just and P. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B., & Freedle, R. (Eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. New York: Wiley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. Critical notice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977,29, 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, C.H. Representing logical and semantic structures of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 1, 371–458. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, C.H. Acquisition of semantic information from discourse: Effects of repeated exposures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975, 14, 158–169. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, C.H. Effects of context-induced processing operations on semantic information acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 1, 139–166. (c)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E.J., & Levin, H. The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, J.F. The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E.R. How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods (6th ed.). New York: David McKay Company Inc., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, J. On the control of saccades in reading. Vision Research, 1975, 15, 620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, J. Toward a speech-plan eye-movement model of reading. In R.A. Monty and J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey, E.B. The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968 (originally published in 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.E. Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. The representation of meaning in memory. New York: Wiley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P.A. Buswell’s discoveries. In R.A. Monty and J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkie, G.W. The use of eye-movement data in determining the perceptual span in reading. In R.A. Monty and J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A.S. Flexibility in reading. International Reading Association Conference Proceedings, 1963, 8, 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A. English verbs of motion: A case study in semantics and lexical memory. In A.W. Melton and E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory. Washington, DC: Winston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A., & Rumelhart, D.E. Exploration in cognition. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E.F. The measurement of reading flexibility: Problems and perspectives. Reading Information Series: Where Do We Go? International Reading Association, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E.F., & Hess, A.K. The measurement of internal (intra-article reading flexibility. Nineteenth Yearbook (Vol. 1). National Reading Conference Milwaukee. The National Reading Conference, 1971, 254–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raygor, A.L. McGraw-Hill basic skills system: Reading test (Manual). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., & McConkie, G.W. What guides a reader’s eye movements? Vision Research, 1976, 16, 829–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. Notes on a schema for stories. In D. Bobrow and A. Collins (Eds.), Representing and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In R. Schank and K. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W.L. Reading eye movements from an information-processing point of view. In D.W. Massaro (Eds.), Understanding language: An information-processing analysis of speech perception, reading and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scinto, L.F. Relation of eye fixations to old - new information of texts. Paper presented at the Conference of Psychological Processes and Eye Movements, Monterey, CA, February 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P.W. Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T.A. Recalling and summarizing complex discourse. University of Amsterdam, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, S. Research. The Reading Teacher, 1967, 21, 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shebilske, W.L., Reid, L.S. (1979). Reading Eye Movements, Macro-structure and Comprehension Processes. In: Kolers, P.A., Wrolstad, M.E., Bouma, H. (eds) Processing of Visible Language. Nato Conference Series, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0996-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0994-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics