Abstract
In CVM applications, several factors may contribute to the possibility of distortions in the estimates: a low number of samples, the bidding game starting point threshold, poor knowledge of the person interviewed of the hypothetical market, etc. The adoption of suitable expedients in the estimating procedure may help to remove many causes for error (see, among others, Mitchell and Carson, 1989), but there is no doubt that the very nature of the subject of evaluation leads to considerable uncertainty over its quantification in monetary terms. On the other hand, the reason for resorting to an evaluation of natural resources or their functions does not always stem from the necessity to quantify them in absolute terms, but rather to attribute an ordering of alternative projects in relation to their social value.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K.J., and Fisher, A.C., 1974. Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility.Quarterly Journal of Economics88: 313–319.
Bishop, R.C., and Heberlein, T.A., 1990. “The Contingent Valuation Method”. In Johnson, R.L., and Johnson, G.V., (eds.).Economic Valuation of natural resources: Issues Theory and Applications. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Casini, L., and Romano, S., 1994. La valutazione del surplus dei cacciatori nella provincia di firenze con l’impiego di modelli di scelta dicotomici: aspetti metodologicied applicativi.Aestimum(settembre-dicembre).
Cicchetti, C.J., and Smith, V.K., 1973.Congestion, quality, deterioretion and optimal use: wilderness recreation in the Spanish Peaks Primitive Area. Washington D.C.: Seminar Press for Resources for the future, Inc.
Cocheba, D.J., and Langford, W. A., 1978. Wildlife valuation: the collective good aspect of hunting.Land Economics54 (4): 491–504.
Fredman, P., 1994. “Values of endangered species - The case of the white-backed woodpecker in Sweden”., Sweriges Lantbruks Universitet Istitutionen Fór Skogsekonomi, Umea University.
Hanemann, W. M., 1984. Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.American Journal ofAgricoltural Economics66 (3): 332–41.
Hanemann, W. M., 1988. “Three Approaches to Defining ‘Existence’ or Nonuse Values Under Certainty”. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley. July.
Hanemann, W. M., 1989. Information and the Concept of Option Value.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management16 (1): 23–37.
Heritage, Conservation and Recreation Service, 1980. “Third Nationwide Outdoor Recreation Plan”. U. S. Dept. of the Interior. Washington, D.C.: Gov. Printing Office.
Kutrilla, J., and Fisher, A. C., 1975.The Economics of Natural Environments. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univensity Press.
Marinelli, A., and Romano, D., 1987. L’analisi della domanda di ricreazione all’aperto in forests: aspetti metodologici e applicativi.Studi di economia e di diritto(2): 123–53.
Romano, D., and Carbone, F., 1993. La valutazione economics dei benefici ambientali: unconfronto fra approcci non di mercato.Rivista di economia agrariaXLVIII (1): 19–62.
Romano, S., 1994. Modelli bioeconomici per l’applicazione della legge quadro 157/92 sulla gestione delle risorse faunistiche.Rivista di economia agrariaIL (4).
Romano, S., 1995a. I contenuti della legge quadro sulla caccia (l.n. 157/92) e nuove opportunità per l’agricoltura.Genio rurale(5).
Romano, S., 1995b. Il valore economico della caccia alla stanziale in provincia di Firenze: un confronto fra diverse metodologie di valutazione. (mimeo).
Romano, S., 1995C. L’attività venatoria in toscana: analisi degli impattisui settori economici attraverso l’impiegodiun modello input-output.Aestimum(dicembre).
Roy, B., 1976.Partial preference analysis and decision aid: the fuzzy outranking relation concept. Paris. S.E.M.A.
Sheafer, M. B., 1957. Some Consideration of Population Dynamics and Economics in Relation to the Management OF Marine Fisheries.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada14: 669–681.
Weisbrod, B.A., 1964. Collective-Consumption Services of Individual-Consumption Goods.Quarterly Journal of Economics78: 471–77
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Casini, L., Romano, S. (1998). The Economic Value of Hunting in Florence Province. In: Bishop, R.C., Romano, D. (eds) Environmental Resource Valuation. Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, vol 11. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5741-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5741-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7630-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5741-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive