Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter examines the general characteristics of and related recent research on smart toys. Smart toys can be defined as new forms of toys featuring both tangible objects and electronic components that facilitate two-way child–smart toy interactions to carry out purposeful tasks. In this chapter, smart toy based learning projects are discussed and the characteristics of smart toys as cognitive tools to facilitate learning are analyzed. This chapter also covers the relationship between smart toys and children’s developmental stages—with a particular focus on motivation—in order to understand smart toys’ potential effects on children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alimisis, D., Moro, M., Arlegui, J., Pina, A., Frangu, S., & Papanikolaou, K. (2007). Robotics & constructivism in education: The TERECoP project. In I. Kalas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th EuroLogo conference (pp. 1–11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axline, V. M. (1974). Play therapy. New York, NY: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, S., & Amery, J. (2009). Play and development. In A. Justin (Ed.), Children’s palliative care in Africa (pp. 37–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, G., & Harris, M. (1994). Principles of developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cassell, J., & Ryokai, K. (2001). Making space for voice: Technologies to support children’s fantasy and storytelling. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(3), 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontijn, W., & Mendels, P. (2005, May 8–13). StoryToy: The interactive storytelling toy. In H. Gellersen, R. Want, & A. Schmidt (Eds.), Third International Conference, PERVASIVE 2005. Munich, Germany. Proceedings series: Lecture notes in computer science, 3468, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei, P., Su, V., Mikhak, B., & Ishii, H. (2000). curlybot: Designing a new class of computational toys. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 129–136). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/332040.332416.

  • Glos, J., & Cassell, J. (1997). Rosebud: Technological toys for storytelling. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 359–360). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 115–140). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinske, S., Lampe, M., Yuill, N., Price, S., & Langheinrich, M. (2010). Let the play set come alive: Supporting playful learning through the digital augmentation of a traditional toy environment. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Workshop on Pervasive Learning (PerEL) at PerCom 2010 (pp. 280–285). Mannheim, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S., Kalanithi, J., & Merrill, D. (2010). Make a riddle and telestory: Designing children’s applications for the Siftables platform. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 206–209). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jonassen, D. H. (1992). What are cognitive tools? In P. D. Kommers, D. H. Jonassen, & J. T. Mayes (Eds.), Cognitive tools for learning (pp. 1–6). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joolingen, W. V. (1999). Cognitive tools for discovery learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kara, N., Aydin, C. C., & Cagiltay, K. (2012a). Design and development of a smart storytelling toy. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.649767.

  • *Kara, N., Aydin, C. C., & Cagiltay, K. (2012b). User study of a new smart toy for children’s storytelling. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2012.682587.

  • Kim, B., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35, 207–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudrowitz, B., & Wallace, D. (2009). The play pyramid: A play classification and ideation tool for toy design. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/2.00b/www/2009/lecture2/PlayPyramid.pdf.

  • Lampe, M., & Hinske, S., (2007). Integrating interactive learning experiences into augmented toy environments. Proceedings of Pervasive Learning Workshop at Pervasive 2007 (pp. 1–9). Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. E., & Rosenquest, B. (2001). The increasing role of ­electronic toys in the lives of infants and toddlers: Should we be concerned? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2(2), 242–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Bera, S. (2005). An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Luckin, R., Connolly, D., Plowman, L., & Airey, S. (2003). Children’s interactions with interactive toy technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude learning and instruction: Volume 3: Cognitive and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Retrieved from http://ocw.metu.edu.tr/mod/resource/view.php?id=1311

  • Mauch, E. (2001). Using technological innovation to improve the problem-solving skills of middle school students: Educators’ experiences with the LEGO Mindstorms robotic invention system. The Clearing House, 74(4), 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D., Kalanithi, J., & Maes, P. (2007). Siftables: Towards sensor network user interfaces. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 75–78).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretti, P. O., & Sydney, T. M. (1984). Parental toy choice stereotyping and its effects on child toy preference and sex-role typing. Social Behavior and Personality, 12(2), 213–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, E., & Brooks, A. (2006). Virtual and physical toys: Open-ended features for non-formal learning. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(2), 196–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Piaget, J. (1962). The stages of the intellectual development of the child. In A. Slater & D. Muir (Eds.), The Blackwell reader in developmental psychology (pp. 35–42). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. E. Ripple & V. N. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered: Report of the conference on cognitive studies and curriculum development (pp. 7–20). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, B., & Ishii, H. (2002). PegBlocks: A learning aid for the elementary classroom. In L. Terveen & D. Wixon (Eds.), CHI ‘02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 686–687). Minneapolis, MN: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2003). A ‘benign addition’? Research on ICT and pre-school children. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2004). Let‘s get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers in Education, 43(1–2), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Roussou, M. (2004). Learning by doing and learning through play: An exploration of inter-activity in virtual environments for children. ACM Journal on Computers in Entertainment, 2(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryokai, K., & Cassell, J. (1999). Computer support for children’s collaborative fantasy play and storytelling. In Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (p. 63). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • The NPD Group Inc. (2011). World toy sales in 2010 were $83.3 billion, an increase of nearly 5 percent over 2009 [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/pressreleases/pr_110702

  • Toy Industry Association, Inc. (2007). Consumer perceptions of ­electronic toys. New York, NY: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaucelle, C., & Jehan, T. (2002). Dolltalk: a computational toy to enhance children’s creativity. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 776–777). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kursat Cagiltay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cagiltay, K., Kara, N., Aydin, C.C. (2014). Smart Toy Based Learning. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics