Skip to main content

Reorienting Teacher Education to Address Sustainable Development Through WikiQuESD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reveal how a newly advanced concept “WikiQuESD” could be utilized as a scaffolding hypermedia tool to enhance preservice teachers’ education for sustainable development (ESD) project-based learning. Through a naturalistic study, based on a group of 30 undergraduate students revealed that the use of WikiQuESD allowed preservice teachers to design and upload interactive ESD projects online through collecting, assessing, and integrating digital material available in the Web. They could also brainstorm, share, and discuss their project ideas, while the instructor could make comments and monitor the development process. These results imply that the learning power of the WikiQuESD and Wiki technology in general can transform teachers from software users to hypermedia authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Åhlberg, M. (2004). Concept mapping for sustainable development. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak &. M. González (eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Vol. 1 (pp. 34-44). Pamplona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubusson, P., Steele, F., Dinham, S., Brady, C. (2007). Action learning in teacher learning community formation: Informative or transformative? Teacher Development, 11(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2004). Reflection: journals and reflective questions: a strategy for professional learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.N. (1997). Computer and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1996). Learning – The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewitt, S. L. (1996). The current nature of hypertext research in computers and composition studies. Computers and Composition, 13(1), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, B. (1998). WebQuests: A strategy for scaffolding higher level learning. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, San Diego, June 22-24, Retrieved 22 January 2011 from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/necc98.htm.

  • Ellis, G., & Weekes, T. (2008). Making sustainability ‘real’: Using group-enquiry to promote education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(4), 482–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (2006). Building bridges: Reflections on the problem of transfer of learning in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J. (2008). Sustainability in higher education: Implications for disciplines. Theory and Research in Education, 6(2), 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, J., & Sumsion, J. (2000). Transformative pathways: Field-based teacher educators’ perceptions. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 26(3), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (2003). Curriculum: product or praxis?. Athens: Savvalas (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckle, J. (2010). ESD and the current crisis of capitalism. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D.H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice Hall (2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoulas-Makrakis, N., & Makrakis, V. (2008). Interculturality and education for a sustainable future. Heraklion: E-media University of Crete (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawale, S., & Bory-Adams, A. (2010). The decade of education for sustainable development: Towards four pillars of learning. Development, 53(4), 547–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes towards e-learning. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1066–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, H. C. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education program for high school English teachers in Taiwan, ROC. System, 29, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makrakis, V. (2006). Preparing United Arab Emirates teachers for building a sustainable society. University of Crete: E-Media publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrakis, V. (2008). An instructional design module of ICT that empowers teachers to integrate education for sustainable development across the curriculum. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference with International Participation on Information and Communication Technologies in Education (v.1, pp. 391–398). University of Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrakis, V. (2010a). The challenge of WikiQuESD as an environment for constructing knowledge in teaching and learning for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(1), 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrakis, V. (2010b). Strategies to reinforce the role of ICT in teaching and learning for sustainability. In M. Witthaus, K. Candless & R. Lambert (eds.), Tomorrow Today (pp. 169–171). Leicester: Tudor Rose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrakis, V. (2011). ICT-enabled education for sustainable development: Merging theory with praxis. In M. Youssef & S.A. Anwar (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East (pp. 410–419). Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University, Dubai, UAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning. Athens: Metaixmio (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neo, M., & Neo, K. (2001). Innovative teaching: using multimedia in a problem-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 4(4), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, D. A. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, Rev 01-2008, Florida. Institute for Human and Machine. Retrieved 12 March 2011 from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.

  • Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, L. (2008). How ICTs can support education for sustainable development: Current uses and trends. Retrieved 12 March 2011 from http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/ict_education_sd_trends.pdf.

  • Pilling-Cormick, J. (1997). Transformative and self-directed learning in practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest, A.M., & Sturgess, P. (2005). But is it scholarship? Group reflection as a scholarly activity. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 2(1), 1-9. Retrieved 12 March 2011 from http://www.sleid.cqu.edu.au/viewissue.php?id=6.

  • Raymond, A. (1997). The use of concept mapping in qualitative research: A multiple case study in mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(3), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rode, H., & Michelsen, G. (2008). Levels of indicator development for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sockman, B., & Sharma, P. (2008). Struggling toward a transformative model of instruction: It’s not so easy!. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 1070–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S., & Scott, W. (2008). Higher education and ESD in England: A critical commentary on recent initiatives. Environmental Education Research, 14(4), 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable Education: Revisioning, Learning and Change. Totnes: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiler, G. M., & Philleo, T. (2003). Blogging and blogspots: An alternative format for encouraging reflective practice among preservice teachers. Academic Research Library, 123(4), 789–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T., Maclntyre, W., Galea, V., & Steel, C. (2007). Enhancing problem-based learning designs with a single e-learning scaffolding tool: Two case studies using challenge FRAP. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tella, A., & Adu, E. (2009). Information Communication Technology (ICT) and curriculum development: the challenges for education for sustainable development. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2(3), 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (2010). Generative learning theory, paradigm shifts, and constructivism in educational psychology: A tribute to Merl Wittrock. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhear, J., & Pace, P. J. (2008). Integrating knowledge, feelings and action: Using vee heuristics and concept mapping in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Netherlands National Commission (2008). Culture and sustainable development: Executive summary. Netherlands National Commission for UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2005). Guidelines and Recommendations for Reorienting Teacher Education to Address Sustainability, UNESCO Education for Sustainable Development in Action. Technical Paper No 4, Retrieved 12 March 2011 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001433/143370e.pdf.

  • UNESCO (2006). Higher Education for Sustainable Development Education. UN Decade, 2005-2014- Section for Education for Sustainable Development (ED/PEQ/ESD). Paris: UNESCO Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A.E.J. (2009). A mid-DESD review: Key findings and ways forward. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(2), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A., & Blaze Corcoran, P. (2006). Sustainability as an outcome of transformative learning. In J. Holmberg & B. E. Samuelsson (eds.), Drivers and Barriers for Implementing Sustainable Development in Higher Education (pp. 103-110). UNESCO Education for Sustainable Development in Action Technical Paper N°3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2004). Evaluating participatory development: tyranny, power and (re)politicization. Third World Quarterly, 25(3), 557–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S.-H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vassilios Makrakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Makrakis, V. (2012). Reorienting Teacher Education to Address Sustainable Development Through WikiQuESD. In: Jimoyiannis, A. (eds) Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics