Skip to main content

A comparison study of qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques for the assessment of safety in industry

  • Conference paper
Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management ’96

Abstract

The primary function of safety systems is avoiding personal injuries or death and environmental pollution. Major problem is that, at this moment, there is no standardised method for the assessment for safety in the process industry. Many companies and institutes use qualitative techniques for safety analysis while other companies and institutes use quantitative techniques. The authors of this paper will compare different quantitative and qualitative techniques and will show that different analysis techniques show widely different results. It will also be shown that the qualitative techniques are highly dependent on human judgement while the quantitative techniques suffer from highly uncertain underlying data. Therefore in the second part of the paper a new quantitative technique will be presented that can be used for the assessment of safety, availability and triprate in the process industry. This technique can take into account effects of uncertain data and identify parameters that influence safety and/or availability dominantly. Finally the paper presents an example of the new technique applied to a practical system used in Dutch petrochemical industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rouvroye, J.L., et al, Uncertainty in safety, New techniques for the assessment and optimisation of safety in process industry. SERA-Vol. 4, Safety Engineering and Risk Analsysis, ASME 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brombacher A.C., Rouvroye J.L., Safety Analysis NAM HIPPS systems using Statistical Sensitivity techniques, Eindhoven University internal report, October 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. Electrical (E) / Electronic (E) / Programmable Electronic Systems (PES) for Use in Safety Applications — Safety Integrity Evaluation Techniques, ISA Technical Report Draft 4, June 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spence R., Singh Soin R., Tolerance Design of Electronic Circuits, Addison Wesley, Wokingham UK), 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brombacher A.C., Reliability by Design, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1992

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rouvroye, J.L., Goble, W.M., Brombacher, A.C., Spiker, R.T.E. (1996). A comparison study of qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques for the assessment of safety in industry. In: Cacciabue, P.C., Papazoglou, I.A. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management ’96. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3409-1_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3409-1_90

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3411-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3409-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics