Skip to main content

Conclusions on Climate Governance in the Arctic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Governance in the Arctic

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 50))

  • 1608 Accesses

Abstract

This concluding chapter seeks to systematize the mitigative and adaptive responses to climate change considered by the different authors of this volume by posing four questions: who is charged with adaptation and mitigation, which adaptive and mitigative measures are being targeted, what are the means for adaptation and mitigation, and, finally, are the suggested actions able to support expressed aims for adaptation and mitigation? The discussion of these questions reveals the importance of the current institutional contexts in the framing of adaptation and mitigation issues. It also emphasises the importance of context and the variety of adaptive measures that are being considered, both within national and local contexts but also within the patchwork of different international regimes that touch the Arctic. The chapter concludes by canvassing recent governance developments and especially the initiative of the five coastal states (the Ilulissat Declaration) and that of the European Union. These developments have the potential to challenge existing governance structures based on the eight member states of the Arctic Council and its system of permanent representatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, Viikari notes that local communities, indigenous as well as non-indigenous, should be involved in conservation of world heritage in the Arctic where links between cultural and natural heritage are strong (see Chapter 8 by Viikari, this volume).

  2. 2.

    Yet, VanderZwaag (this volume) also takes up the suggested benefits of the treaty approach: “encouraging greater political and bureaucratic commitments; establishing firmer institutional and financial foundations; transcending the vagaries of changing governmental viewpoints and shifting personnel; giving ‘legal teeth’ to environmental principles and standards; raising the public profile of regional challenges and cooperation needs; and providing for dispute resolution mechanisms”.

  3. 3.

    The only exception is the Nordic Council, which went further and adopted the following recommendation directed at the Nordic Council of Ministers: “The Nordic Council recommends to the Nordic Council of Ministers that in cooperation with the Arctic Council the aim is to create a legal system pertaining to the Arctic.” See Pohjoiset merialueet käsittävästä oikeustieteellisestä tutkimuksesta ja Arktista koskevasta oikeusjärjestelmästä (In English: Legal Research pertaining to the Northern marine Regions and Arctic Legal Regime) (26 April 2006 decision) A 1392/medborgar. On file with the authors.

  4. 4.

    Passed by the Senate on 4 October 2007. The House of Representatives voted in favour of SJ Res. No. 17 in May 2008 and the President signed it on 4 June 2008.

References

  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsil, M. (2005). Cities and climate change: Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. London and New York: Routledge Studies in Physical Geography and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006, August). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union. (2007). Commission’s Communication. Com (2007) 575 final. Retrieved August 20, 2008, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0575:FIN:EN:PDF

  • High Representative for European Foreign and Security Policy & the European Commission. (2008, March 14). Climate Change and International Security. Paper for the European Council. S113/08. Retrieved August 2008, from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/ docs/pressData/en/reports/99387.pdf

  • Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2004). Negotiating the Arctic. The construction of an international region. New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, T., & Heinämäki, L. (2006, April). The participation of indigenous peoples in international norm-making in the Arctic. Polar Record, 42(221), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural odysseys: Navigating the new international politics of diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montreal 2005. Arctic Council Statement on Climate Change in the Arctic Region delivered at the UNFCCC Montreal 9 December 2005. Retrieved August 2008, from http://arctic.council.org/filearchive/AC%20statement%20CoP11%20Montreal_final.pdf

  • O’Brien, K., & Leichenko, R. (2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10(3), 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report of the seventh conference of the Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region, Kiruna, Sweden, 2–4 August 2006. (2006, August 4). Recommendation No. 28. Retrieved August, 2008, from http://www.arcticparl.org/resource/images/Arktiska_rapport_070125.pdf

  • Report on recommendations from the Arendal Seminar on Multilateral Environmental Agreements and their Relevance to the Arctic, Arendal Norway, 21–22 September 2006. (2006, September 22). Retrieved August 20, 2008, from http://polar.grida.no/_documents/mea_ recommendations.pdf

  • Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R., & Wandel, J. (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change, 45(1), 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Carina H. Keskitalo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keskitalo, E.C.H., Koivurova, T., Bankes, N. (2009). Conclusions on Climate Governance in the Arctic. In: Koivurova, T., Keskitalo, E., Bankes, N. (eds) Climate Governance in the Arctic. Environment & Policy, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9542-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics