Abstract
This chapter refines and formalizes the normative concepts of duty and obligation consistent with the ideas of institutional economics. To do so, deontic logic and normative system philosophy is utilized in order to formalize a methodology that enhances normative description, empirical investigation, and decision making. This formalization assumes the normative sets of social, technological, and ecological criteria as expressed in the social fabric matrix, and is grounded in the concepts of prohibition, obligation, and permission as emphasized by Karl Polanyi and John R. Commons. The deontic system necessary for a society to integrate authority and processing institutions to create and fulfill normative criteria through rules, regulations, and requirements is developed in a temporal setting. This explanation does not suggest that real-world normative systems are harmonious or continuous, or that they maintain commonality of normative criteria, avoid excess or inadequate redundancy, and are without gaps and conflict. In fact, it is quite to the contrary. The explanation is structured so studies can be completed to find the gaps, discontinuity, disharmony, and conflicts. Given the fragility of the modern world, analytical tools that assist in this task are of paramount concern.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alchourron CE, Bulygin E (1971) Normative systems. Springer, New York
Bush PD (1983) An exploration of the structural characteristics of Veblen–Ayres–Foster defined institutional domain. J Econ Issues 17:35–65
Bush PD (1987) The theory of institutional change. J Econ Issues 21:1075–1116.
Bush PD (1991) Reflections on the twenty-fifth anniversary of AFEE: philosophical and methodological issues in institutional economics. J Econ Issues 25:321–346.
Commons JR (1924) The legal foundations of capitalism. University of Wisconsin, Madison
Forrester JW (1996) Being good and being logical: philosophical groundwork for a new deontic logic. M.E. Sharpe, New York
Gill R (1996) An integrated social fabric matrix/system dynamics approach to policy analysis. Syst Dyn Rev 12:167–249
Hayden FG (1982) Social fabric matrix: from perspective to analytical tool. J Econ Issues 16:637–661
Hayden FG (1985) A trans-disciplinary integration matrix for economics and policy analysis. Social Sci Inf 24:869–903
Neale WC (1987) Institutions. J Econ Issues 21:1177–1206
Neale WC and Pearson HW (1962) Institutions and economics. Unpublished paper 1–12
Polanyi K (1957) The economy as instituted process. In: Polanyi K et al (eds) Trade and market in early empire. Free Press, Glencoe, IL, pp 243–270
Schlagel RH (1995) Unpublished letter to F. Gregory Hayden 1–2
Von Wright GH (1983) Practical reason. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Symbol Reference
Appendix: Symbol Reference
- SFM:
-
social fabric matrix
- Ph:
-
prohibited or forbidden
- O:
-
 obligation or obligatory
- P:
-
permission or permitted
- NB :
-
social belief norms or criteria
- NT :
-
technological norms or criteria
- NE :
-
ecological norms or criteria
- nB1, nB2, and nB3 :
-
subnorms or subcriteria of NB
- nT1 and nT2 :
-
subnorms or subcriteria of NT
- nE1 and nE2 :
-
subnorms or subcriteria of NE
- IA1 :
-
authority institution for making rules
- IA2 :
-
authority institution for making regulations
- Ip :
-
processing institution for delivering requirements
- r:
-
rules
- re:
-
regulations
- rq:
-
requirements
- E:
-
event happening or occasion
- F:
-
situational property of a high volume of water in the river
- G:
-
situational property of high soil temperature
- H:
-
situational property of spreading waste
- S:
-
situation
- U:
-
action to spread waste to solve a problem
- W:
-
subaction of U
- X:
-
subaction of U
- Y:
-
subaction of U
- Z:
-
subaction of U
- h:
-
human entities
- t:
-
technological entities
- e:
-
ecological entities
- n :
-
number
- ∼:
-
negation
- &:
-
conjunction
- V:
-
disjunction
- É:
-
directs or necessarily implies
- ↔:
-
equivalence
- /:
-
given
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hayden, F.G. (2009). Normative Analysis of Instituted Processes. In: Natarajan, T., Elsner, W., Fullwiler, S. (eds) Institutional Analysis and Praxis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88741-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88741-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-88740-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-88741-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)