Skip to main content

The Social Fabric Matrix, the Principles of Institutional Adjustment, and Individual Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Institutional Analysis and Praxis

Abstract

The social fabric matrix (SFM) together with the principles of institutional adjustment (PIA) may be used within the theoretical framework of the Veblenian dichotomy. This combination advances the conceptual and empirical reach of both. The Veblenian dichotomy is used to analyze the relationship of instrumental and ceremonial behaviors to institutions. It ties together the PIA and the SFM. The SFM identifies and incorporates several components for examining a problem and attempting to develop policies. The analysis of change is an important aspect of Institutional economics. Change involves adjustment of ceremonial behaviors to instrumental ones. Change in both group and individual behavior is controlled by the PIA. Habit adjustment is the individual counterpart to institutional adjustment. Perception of circumstances and consequences control behavior, and perceptions are controlled by habits. The potential directions and ability of an institution/habit to change can be informed by use of the SFM. The subject matter of this chapter is the connection of these and their application to institutional and individual adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Waller (1982). I came of age on C.E. Ayres’ version of the Veblenian dichotomy, but gradually came to Foster’s view. The main force in changing my thinking was the Principles of Institutional Adjustment. Bill Williams had much to do with it. Those who knew Bill or his work will recognize his influence on this present chapter.

  2. 2.

    Pragmatic is used in the classical sense as found in the work of C.S. Peirce and John Dewey. See Webb (2007).

  3. 3.

    Foster’s term was technological determinism (Foster, 1981). In this chapter it has been renamed as instrumental primacy. The latter is more in line with terminology used to define the Veblenian dichotomy and in light of contemporary usage of technological determinism, it is less likely to be misunderstood.

  4. 4.

    For a more complete explication of deliberation as used in pragmatic philosophy see Dewey (1922).

  5. 5.

    Here, the argument is not significantly different from that made by Dewey (1922). It is only in its application to the theory of human behavior as the control of perception that the argument is expanded.

  6. 6.

    Here, the term experience is meant as Dewey expresses it, perhaps best in Art as Experience, Chap. 3: “Having an Experience.”

References

  • Bush PD (1987) The theory of institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues 21(3):1075–1116

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1922) Human nature and conduct: an introduction to social psychology. Modern Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1929) Experience and nature. Dover, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foster JF (1981) Syllabus for problems of modern society: the theory of institutional adjustment. Journal of Economic Issues 15(4):929–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden FG (2006) Policy making for a good society: the social fabric matrix approach to policy analysis and program evaluation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover JF (1987) History of the Baltimore & Ohio railroad. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller WT (1982) The evolution of the Veblenian dichotomy: Veblen, Hamilton, Ayres, and Foster. Journal of Economic Issues 16(3):757–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb JL (2007) Pragmatisms (plural), part 1: classical pragmatism and some implications for empirical inquiry. Journal of Economic Issues XLI(4):1063–1086

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sturgeon, J.I. (2009). The Social Fabric Matrix, the Principles of Institutional Adjustment, and Individual Action. In: Natarajan, T., Elsner, W., Fullwiler, S. (eds) Institutional Analysis and Praxis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88741-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics