Skip to main content

Indian Agriculture in a Liberalized Landscape: The Interlocking of Science, Trade Liberalization, and State Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Institutional Analysis and Praxis
  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

Mainstream macroeconomic policy in India has sought to alleviate rural poverty and food insecurity by expanding agricultural production, providing agricultural credit through a national agricultural banking system, programs of employment generation to alleviate income poverty, and some state-level midday meal schemes at schools. The green revolution was introduced in the late sixties, making India food self-sufficient at the national level. Even as the country accumulated buffer stocks of food, problems of hunger and starvation nevertheless persisted at the individual, household, village, and regional levels. Beginning in the late nineteen eighties, India gradually began to adopt market friendly policies. The economic crisis in 1991 set India on a path of fast track liberalization and structural adjustment resulting in comprehensive initiatives by the Government to promote the industrialization of agriculture. The government has opened up contract farming, food processing, horticulture, value added agricultural products, export crops, and biotechnology, and has allowed private corporations to invest in agriculture. This rapid industrialization is a transformative process. The social fabric matrix approach demonstrates this process where trade liberalization, scientific research, agricultural policy, and the ideology of neo-liberalism are interlocking agents shaping the contemporary industrialization of agriculture in India today. Thus, in the context of a liberalizing India, the concept of transformation replaces the term development and helps to focus our attention on a detailed understanding of the interactive institutional process of change in agriculture. The question continues to be whether or not the contemporary expansion of the agrarian sector through industrialization has served in preventing the ever-present problem of endemic hunger that nearly 320 million Indians still face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Joseph 2006.

  2. 2.

    See Bajpai and Sachs (1997) in which they present a moving average of average growth for four always closed and eight always open economies between 1965 and 1985 as evidence to argue that open economies grew much faster than closed economies.

  3. 3.

    For further reading on longitudinal and village level studies on the impact of the green revolution see Farmer (1977, 1979), Harriss (1982), Harriss-White (2004) Hazell and Ramaswamy (1991).

  4. 4.

    See Dreze (2003), Sen (2003), Sen and Patnaik in Joseph (2006).

  5. 5.

    India suffered a severe macroeconomic and balance of payment crisis in the early 1990s. The consolidated gross fiscal deficit of the central and state governments in fiscal year 1990–1991 was as a high as 9.4% of GDP. With a GDP growth of 1.3%, an inflation rate over 10%, and by the summer of 1991 with foreign exchange reserves plummeting to below 2 weeks’ worth of imports, India was on the verge of bankruptcy (Bhagwati 1993).

  6. 6.

    See Sen (2002), Kothari and Minogue (2002), Patnaik and Chandrasekhar (1998).

  7. 7.

    I am grateful to Dr. Sunder Ramaswamy, President Monterey Institute of International Studies and Fredrick C. Dirks Professor of Economics Middlebury College for his input to the section on economic reforms in India.

  8. 8.

    Pulses are defined by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) as annual leguminous crops solely harvested for the dry grain, yielding from 1 to 12 grains or seeds. Pulses are used for food and animal feed. Pulses are important food crop due to their high protein and essential amino acid content and for playing a key role in crop rotation due to their nitrogen fixing ability. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_(legume))

  9. 9.

    Based on such arguments, many have advocated deregulating and liberalizing agriculture. However, it must be noted that even amongst those who advocate deregulating and liberalizing agriculture, many academics and policy makers in India have questioned the ad hoc nature of many of the reform decisions in agriculture particularly that of decontrolling input prices and relaxing import controls (Gulati 2002).

  10. 10.

    I am grateful to Clifford Poirot for his thorough and insightful comments on this issue that appeared in paper I presented at the AFIT meetings in 2006.

  11. 11.

    Note that agricultural scientific research agencies are by no means uniquely post liberalization phenomena. They have been an active part of agricultural research in India, particularly since the green revolution. The current climate of liberalization and the government’s active role in making agriculture an industrialized sector has certainly made agricultural research and crop breeding a key part of the ongoing changes India.

  12. 12.

    Harriss-White (2004) refers to Shaffer (1984) to explain the overlapping of politics in the policy process. Also see Hayden (1989, 1992, 1993, 2006) to understand the treatment of interlocking relationships in the policy process.

  13. 13.

    See Ray (1998) for a theoretical explanation of the concepts of functional and personal distribution of income. For a critique and discussion of the effects of commercialized agriculture in India see Bhalla in Chadha and Sharma (1997).

  14. 14.

    See Kothari and Minogue (2002).

  15. 15.

    15 The author conducts field studies in dry land areas of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh in southern India. Specifically, she conducted field research in a dry land district of Tamil Nadu in 1999–2000 and continues to collaborate with her long time field collaborator Dr. Arivudai Nambi who resides in Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

  16. 16.

    See Table 1 in Chap. 9 in this volume by Parto and Regmi (2009).

References

  • Bajpai N, Sachs JD (1997) India’s economic reforms: some lessons from East Asia. J Int Trade Econ Dev 6(2):135–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati J (1993) India in transition. Clarendon, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla GS (1997) Structural adjustment and the agricultural sector in India. In: Chadha GK, Sharma AN, Indian Society of Labor Economics (eds) Growth, employment and poverty. Sangham Books Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1995) Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? Environ Urban 7(1):173–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Longhurst R, Arnold P (1982) Seasonal dimensions to rural poverty. Pinter Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA (2009) http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html#Econ

  • Dreze J (2003) Hunger amidst plenty. http://www.indiatogether.org/2003/dec/pov-foodsec.htm

  • Dreze J, Sen A (1981) Poverty and famine: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze J, Sen A (1989) Hunger and public action. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze J, Sen A (2001) India: economic development and social opportunity. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer BH (ed) (1977) Green revolution?: technology and change in rice growing areas of Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer BH (1979) The ‘green revolution’ in South Asian ricefields: environment and production. J Dev Stud 15(4):304–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster AD, Rosenzweig MR (2008) Economic development and the decline of agricultural employment. In: Paul Schultz T, John S (eds) Handbook of development economics, vol 4. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3051–3083

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly S (2003) http://www.indiaonestop.com/Greenrevolution.htm

  • Gulati A (1998) Indian agriculture in an open economy. In: Ahluwalia IJ, Little IMD (eds) India’s economic reforms and development. New Delhi, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A (2002) Economic reforms and the rural sector in India. Econ Dev South Asia 2:38–56 Elgar Reference Collection

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss J (1982) Capitalism and peasant farming: agrarian structure and ideology in northern Tamil Nadu. Oxford University Press, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss-White B (2004) Policy and the agricultural development agenda. In: Barbara H-W, Jankarajan S (eds) Rural India facing the 21st century. Anthem Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden GF (1989) General systems analysis. Survey of Methodologies for Valuing Externalities and Public Goods

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden GF (1993) Institutionalist policy making. In: Tool MR (ed) Institutional economics: theory, method, policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden GF (2006) Policymaking for a good society: the social fabric matrix approach to policy analysis and program evaluation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell PBR, Ramaswamy C (1991) The green revolution reconsidered: the impact of high-yielding rice varieties in South India. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD Published for IFPRI

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRISAT (2009) http://www.icrisat.org/index.htm; http://www.cgiar.org/who/members/funding.html; http://www.cgiar.org/

  • Joseph A (2006) “Covering the Republic of Hunger” in India Together. http://www.indiatogether.org/2006/jan/ajo-hunger.htm. Accessed Feb 1 2008

  • Kothari U, Minogue M (2002) Critical perspectives on development: an introduction. In: Uma K, Martin M (eds) Development theory and practice: critical perspectives. Palgrave, Basingtoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Little IMD (2002) The strategy of Indian development. The Economic Development of South Asia, vol 1. Elgar Reference Collection

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Food Processing Industries (2000) New Delhi. http://mofpi.nic.in/aboutus/goals.htm; http://mofpi.nic.in/policies/index.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2007

  • Nobel Prize (2006) http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2006/press.html

  • Parto S, Regmi A (2009) Microcredit and reconstruction in Afghanistan: an institutionalist critique of imported development. In: Natarajan E, Fullwiler S (eds) Institutional analysis and praxis: the social fabric matrix approach. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik P, Chandrasekhar CP (1998) India: dirigisme, structural adjustment, and the radical alternative. In: Dean B, Epstein GA, Robert P (eds) Globalization and progressive economic policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray D (1998) Development economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (2002) How is India doing. The Economic Development of South Asia, vol 1. Elgar Reference Collection

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (2003) Hunger in India. Address made at a public hearing on hunger and the right to food, Delhi University, 10 Jan 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A (2003) India. In: WTO agreement on agriculture: the implementation experience – developing country case studies. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/Y4632E/y4632e0f.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2008

  • Singh RB (2001) Special address on “Science for sustainable food security, nutritional adequacy, and poverty alleviation in the Asia-Pacific region.” MSSRF-FAO Expert Consultation. 25–28 June 2001, Chennai, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Small Industries Services Institute (2005) Agro processing industries: problems and potential. SISI, Chennai

    Google Scholar 

  • Spice (2003) Contract farming venture in India: a few successful cases. In: The National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), vol 1, No. 4. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan TN (2000) Poverty and undernutrition in South Asia. Food Policy 25:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan MS (2001) Enhancing farm productivity in perpetuity: twenty steps to sustainable food security. A special address in the proceedings of MSSRF-FAO expert consultation on science for sustainable food security, nutritional adequacy, and poverty alleviation in the Asia-Pacific region, Chennai, India, 25–28 June 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan MS (2003) Science and our agricultural future. An inter-disciplinary dialogue on biotechnology for food, health, nutrition and water security, M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, 9–12 Jan 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • TIDCO (2004a) Contract/corporate sector farming policy: Tamil Nadu for the development of fruits and vegetables. http://www.tidco.com/tn_policies/contract_farming.asp. Accessed on 1 Mar 2005

  • TIDCO (2004b) National Agricultural Policy. http://www.tidco.com/india_policies/other_sect_GOI_policies/National_agricultural_policy1. Accessed 1 Mar 2005

  • World Bank (2005) http://devdata.worldbank.org/wdi2005/index2.htm

  • World Bank (2008) http://web.worldbank.org

  • World Bank (2008) http://devdata.worldbank.org/AAG/ind_aag.pdf

  • Yunus M (Fall 1998) Poverty alleviation: is economics any help? Lessons from the Grameen Bank experience. J Int Aff 52:339–352

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Natarajan, T. (2009). Indian Agriculture in a Liberalized Landscape: The Interlocking of Science, Trade Liberalization, and State Policy. In: Natarajan, T., Elsner, W., Fullwiler, S. (eds) Institutional Analysis and Praxis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88741-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics