Skip to main content

Structuring Group Interaction to Promote Thinking and Learning During Small Group Learning in High School Settings

  • Chapter
The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning ((CULS,volume 8))

Reports about success and flaws of cooperative learning in classrooms lead to the conclusion that external structuring of teams and learning tasks is not sufficient, because students often need additional structural support on a level of internal organization of group processes and on the internal level of individual learning orientations. As regards external structuring, the article describes the wide-spread technique of task-specialization in models of cooperative learning as well as its problems, and shows alternative approaches. Support for internal, interactive processes may be achieved by prescribing social roles or even learning, by training relevant competencies before small groups start learning together, by reflecting and evaluating group activities during and after learning, and finally, by modifying how the learners perceive their own and their team-mates’ competencies. The optimal approach is to combine these structural supports for small group learning and to complement it with phases of teacher-centered as well as individual learning. Two combinatory models are described, which also have been shown to reduce the uncertainties of small group learning for more certainty-oriented learners, who otherwise liked cooperation less and achieved less than their uncertainty oriented class-mates. Final recommendations include a warning against the exclusive role of individually centered assessment procedures apparently in cooperative environments of teaching and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andriessen, J. E. B., Coirier, P., Roos, L., Passerault, J. M., & Bert-Erboul, J. M. (1996). Thematic and structural planning in constrained argumentative text production. In H. Van den Bergh, G. Rijlaarsdam & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 237–251). Amsterdam: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, G., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2004). Sozialpsychologie [Social psychology] (4th revised edn.). München: Pearson Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1974). Psychologie des Unterrichts [Psychology of teaching]. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E., Guldimann, T., & Zutavern, M. (1997). Eigenständiges Lernen verstehen und fördern [Understanding and promoting self-regulated learning]. In K. Reusser & M. Reusser-Weyeneth (Eds.), Verstehen: psychologischer Prozess und didaktische Aufgabe [Understanding: psychological process and didactic task] (pp. 207–225). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1993). Bedingungen für kooperative Kleingruppen [Conditions for cooperating small groups]. In G. L. Huber (Ed.), Neue Perspektiven der Kooperation [New perspectives of cooperation] (S. 45–53). Hohengehren: Schneider Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Whitcomb, J. A., Balderrama, M. V., Cossey, R., & Swanson, P. E. (1994). Complex instruction: Higher-order thinking in heterogeneous classrooms. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 82–96). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (1992). Der Glaube an die gerechte Welt: Differenzierung und Validierung eines Konstrukts [The belief in a Just World: Differentiation and validation of a construct]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 23, 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–36). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H., Dansereau, D. F., O’Donnell, A. M., & Skaggs, L. P. (1989). The effect of textual errors on dyadic and individual learning. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H., Rocklin, T. R., Dansereau, D. F., Skaggs, L. P., O’Donnell, A. M., Lambiotte, J. G., & Young, M. D. (1988). The role of individual differences in the learning of technical material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hentig, H. (2004). Einführung in den Bildungsplan 2004. [Introduction to the curriculum 2004] Found on Sept. 08, 2005, under http://www.bildung-staerkt-menschen.de/service/downloads/Sonstiges/Einfuehrung_BP.pdf.

  • Herold, M., & Landherr, B. (2001). SOL Selbstorganisiertes Lernen: ein systemischer Ansatz für Unterricht [SOL Self-organized learning: a systematic approach for the classroom]. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, M., Landherr, B., & Huber, G. L. (1997). Fraktale Lernorganisation in der gymnasialen Oberstufe: Ergebnisse eines Schulversuchs [Fractal organisation of learning in the gymnasiale Oberstufe: Results of a study in schools]. Presentation at the 6th conference of the Fachgruppe Pädagogische Psychologie/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, D., van den Eden, P., & Terwel, J. (1999). The effects of integrated social and cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematics achievement in secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 9, 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. (1999). Bedingungen effektiven Lernens in Kleingruppen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rolle von Lernskripten [Conditions of effective learning in small groups in particular consideration of learning scripts]. Schwangau: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. A. (2004a). Die Partnerpuzzlemethode [The partner-puzzle method]. In A. A. Huber (Hrsg.), Kooperatives Lernen–Kein Problem. Effektive Methoden der Partner-und Gruppenarbeit [Cooperative learning–no problem. Effective methods of working in pairs and groups] (S.39–48). Leipzig: Ernst Klett Schulbuchverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. A. (2004b). Die Strukturierte Kontroverse [The structured controversy]. In A. A. Huber (Hrsg.), Kooperatives Lernen–kein Problem. Effektive Methoden der Partner-und Gruppenarbeit [Cooperative learning–no problem. Effective methods of working in pairs and groups] (S.80–85). Leipzig: Ernst Klett Schulbuchverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. A., Konrad, K., & Wahl, D. (2001). Lernen durch wechselseitiges Lehren [Learning by mutual teaching]. Pädagogisches Handeln, 5 (2), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. A. (2006). Wechselseitiges Lehren und Lernen als spezielle Form Kooperativen Lernens [Mutual teaching and learning as special version of cooperative learning]. Unpublished Habilitation thesis. Weingarten: Educational University Weingarten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. L. (1987). Kooperatives Lernen: Theoretische und praktische Herausforderung für die Pädagogische Psychologie [Cooperative learning: Theoretical and practical challenge for Educational Psychology]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 340–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. L. (2004). Die Praxis macht den Unterschied. Ergebnisse einer vergleichenden Evaluation [Practice makes a difference. Results of a comparative evaluation]. Presentation in a training course for SOL teachers, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. L., & Gürtler, L. (2004). AQUAD Six: Manual for the analysis of qualitative data. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. L., Scholz, G., Kahlert, M., Schmidt, M., Standke, C., & Stauche, H. (1995). Entscheidungsprozesse von Schülern in Lernsituationen [Decision processes of students in learning situations]. Abschlußbericht für die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft über das Projekt Hu348–8/1 und Scho484–1/1. Universität Tübingen und Universität Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. L., Sorrentino, R. M., Davidson, M. A., Eppler, R., & Roth, J. W. H. (1992). Uncertainty orientation and cooperative learning: Individual differences within and across cultures. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1994b). Learning together. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 51–65). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. (1989/90). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempas, G. (1994). Lehren lernen. Auswirkungen interpersoneller Differenzen auf die Lernprozesse Lehrender [Learning how to teach. Effects of interpersonal differences on learning processes of teachers]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1991). Improving lecture conprehension: Effects of a metacognitive stategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on childrens knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, B. A., Larson, C. O., Dansereau, D. F., & Spurlin, J. E. (1985). Cooperative learning: Impact on acquisition of knowledge and skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M. & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120–141). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Hythecker, V. I., Larson, C. O., Rocklin, T. R., Lambiotte, J. G., & Young, M. D. (1986). The effects of monitoring on cooperative learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Nückles, M., Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Hauser, S. (2004). Lerntagebücher als Medium selbstgesteuerten Lernens: Theoretischer Hintergrund, empirische Befunde, praktische Entwicklungen [Learning diaries as a means of self-regulated learning: Theoretical background, empirical findings, practical developments]. In M. Wosnitza, A. Frey & R. S. Jäger (Eds.), Lernprozess, Lernumgebung und Lerndiagnostik. Wissenschaftliche Beiträge zum Lernen im 21. Jahrhundert [Learning process, learning environment, and diagnostics of learning. Scientific contributions to learning in the 21st century] (pp. 101–116). Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reusser, K. (2001). Unterricht zwischen Wissensvermittlung und Lernen lernen. Alte Sackgassen und neue Wege in der Bearbeitung eines pädagogischen Jahrhundert problems [Teaching between transmission of knowledge and learning to learn. Well-known dead ends and new ways to elaborate on an educational problem of the century]. In C. Finkbeiner & G. W. Schnaitmann (Eds.), Lehren und Lernen im Kontext empirischer Forschung und Fachdidaktik [Teaching and learning in the context of empirical research and special didactics] (pp. 106–140). Donauwörth: Auer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, M. (1996). Between memory and history. A word about intercultural education. The European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 7, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O’Malley, C. E. (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotering-Steinberg, S. & von Kügelgen, T. (1986). Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung zum Gruppenunterricht [Results of a survey on group learning]. Erziehungswissenschaft - Erziehungspraxis, 2, 26–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotering-Steinberg, S. (2000): Untersuchungen zum Sozialen Lernen in Schulen [Studies on social learning in schools]. In C. Dalbert & E. J. Brunner, (Eds.): Handlungsleitende Kognitionen in der Pädagogischen Praxis [Action-guiding cognitions in educational practice] (pp. 119–137). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulgesetz für das Land Baden-Württemberg (Fassung vom 1.4.2004) [School law for the Land Baden-Württemberg]. Found on Sept. 08, 2005, under http://www.leu.bw.schule.de/bild/SchG.pdf.

  • Sharan, Y. & Sharan S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers’ College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd edn.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1995a). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd edn.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995b). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know? Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, R. M., & Hewitt, E. C. (1984). The uncertainty-reducing properties of achievement tasks revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 884–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, R. M., & Short, J.-A. C. (1986). Uncertainty orientation, motivation, and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino, & E. C. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 379–403). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uerdingen, M. (2002). Das Lerntagebuch. Ein Medium zur Begleitung und Unterstützung von Lernprozessen [The learning diary. A medium to accompany and support learning processes]. Grundschule, 3, 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, D. (2004a). Das Lerntempoduett [The learning speed duet]. In A. A. Huber (Hrsg.), Kooperatives Lernen—kein Problem. Effektive Methoden der Partner- und Gruppenarbeit [Cooperative learning—no problem. Effective methods of working in pairs and groups] (S. 58–68). Leipzig: Ernst Klett Schulbuchverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, D. (2004b). Das Partner-und Gruppeninterview [The partner- and group-interview]. In A. A. Huber (Hrsg.), Kooperatives Lernen–kein Problem. Effektive Methoden der Partner- und Gruppenarbeit [Cooperative learning—no problem. Effective methods of working in pairs and groups] (S. 69–75). Leipzig: Ernst Klett Schulbuchverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, D. (2004c). Das Multiinterview als spezielle Variante des Partner-und Gruppen-interviews [The multi-interview as specific variation of the partner- and group-interview]. In A. A. Huber (Hrsg.), Kooperatives Lernen–kein Problem. Effektive Methoden der Partner-und Gruppenarbeit [Cooperative learning—no problem. Effective methods of working in pairs and groups] (S. 76–79). Leipzig: Ernst Klett Schulbuchverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, D. (2005). Lernumgebungen erfolgreich gestalten. Wirksame Wege vom trägen Wissen zum kompetenten Handeln in Erwachsenenbildung, Hochschuldidaktik und Unterricht [Designing learning environments successfully. Effective ways from inert knowledge to competent action in adult education, university didactics, and teaching]. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huber, G.L., Huber, A.A. (2008). Structuring Group Interaction to Promote Thinking and Learning During Small Group Learning in High School Settings. In: Gillies, R.M., Ashman, A.F., Terwel, J. (eds) The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics