Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural Organic Matter: Characterization and Removal by AOPs to Assist Drinking Water Facilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications of Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Drinking Water Treatment

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 67))

Abstract

The water sources of drinking water generally contain natural organic matter (NOM) as a result of the interactions between the hydrologic cycle and the environment. The amount, character, and properties of NOM vary considerably according to the origins of the waters and depend on the biogeochemical cycles of their surrounding environments. NOM can negatively influence water quality in drinking water supply systems, and it can significantly influence the performance of drinking water treatment processes. Hence, NOM removal is an important issue in order to optimize drinking water treatment operation and to reduce the risks of water alteration in the distribution systems. Several treatment processes can be applied for NOM removal depending on water quality, the nature of NOM, and the treatments already existing in the supply system. Among the most effective conventional solutions coagulation/flocculation, filtration, and carbon adsorption are available. An interest has recently increased toward nonconventional solutions based on membrane filtration and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). An overview on the AOPs will be presented and discussed. Moreover, the AOP with ozone and UV radiation, with two low pressure UV lamps, at 254 and 185 nm wavelength, was experimented on a surface water in order to study the removal of odorous and pesticide, organic compounds (UV absorbance and THMs precursors) and bromate formation. Different batch tests were performed with ozone concentration up to 10 mg L−1, UV dose up to 14,000 J m−2, and a maximum contact time of 10 min. The main results show that metolachlor can be efficiently removed with ozone alone while for geosmin and MIB a complete removal can be obtained with the advanced oxidation of ozone, with concentration of 1.5–3 mg L−1 and contact time of 2–3 min, with UV radiation (with doses of 5,000–6,000 J m−2). As concerns the influence of the organic precursors, all the experimented processes show a medium removal of about 20–40% for UV absorbance and 15–30% for THMFP (trihalomethane formation potential).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AOPs:

Advanced oxidation processes

DBPFP:

Disinfection by-products formation potential

DBPs:

Disinfection by-products

DOC:

Dissolved organic carbon

FAs:

Fulvic acids

GC:

Gas chromatography

HAAFP:

Haloacetic acid formation potential

HAAs:

Haloacetic acids

HAs:

Humic acids

HMM:

High molar mass

LMM:

Low molecular mass

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

NOM:

Natural organic matter

SUVA:

Specific UV absorbance

THMFP:

Trihalomethane formation potential

THMs:

Trihalomethanes

TOC:

Total organic carbon

TOX:

Total organic halide

UV–Vis:

Ultraviolet and visible

VUV:

Vacuum ultraviolet

References

  1. Rigobello E, Dantas A, Di Bernardo L, Vieira E (2011) Influence of the apparent molecular size of aquatic humic substances on colour removal by coagulation and filtration. Environ Technol 32:1767–1777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fabris R, Chow C, Drikas M, Eikebrokk B (2008) Comparison of NOM character in selected Australian and Norwegian drinking waters. Water Res 42:4188–4196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodrigues A, Brito P, Janknecht MF, Proença R, Nogueira R (2009) Quantification of humic acids in surface water: effects of divalent cations, pH, and filtration. J Environ Monit 11:377–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crittenden JC (2012) MWH’s water treatment: principles and design. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokorite M, Klavins V, Rodinov G (2012) Trends of natural organic matter concentrations in river waters of Latvia. Environ Monit Assess 184:4999–5008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharp E, Jarvis P, Parsons S, Jefferson B (2006) Impact of fractional character on the coagulation of NOM. Colloids Surf A 286:104–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thurman E (1985) Organic geochemistry of natural waters. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Shestakova M, Sillanpää M (2013) Removal of dichloromethane from ground and wastewater: a review. Chemosphere 93:1258–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Snoeyink VL, Jenkins D (1980) Water chemistry. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Danielsson L (1982) On the use of filters for distinguishing between dissolved and particulate fractions in natural waters. Water Res 16:179–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Korshin G, Chow C, Fabris R, Drikas M (2009) Absorbance spectroscopy-based examination of effects of coagulation on the reactivity of fractions of natural organic matter with varying apparent molecular weights. Water Res 43:1541–1548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sillanpää M (2015) Natural organic matter in water. Characterization and treatment methods. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cehovin M, Medic A, Scheideler J, Mielcke J, Ried A, Kompare B, Gotvajn AZ (2017) Hydrodynamic cavitation in combination with the ozone, hydrogen peroxide and the UV-based advanced oxidation processes for the removal of natural organic matter from drinking water. Ultrason Sonochem 37:394–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matilainen A, Sillanpää M (2010) Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 80:351–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hua G, Reckhow D (2007) Characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors based on hydrophobicity and molecular size. Environ Sci Technol 41:3309–3315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanly, Lim M, Chiang K, Amal R, Fabris R, Chow C, Drikas M (2007) A study on the removal of humic acid using advanced oxidation process. Sep Sci Technol 42:1391–1404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacangelo J, DeMarco J, Owen D, Randtke S (1995) Selected processes for removing NOM: an overview. J Am Water Works Assoc 87(1):64–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Glaze W, Kang J, Chapin D (1987) The chemistry of water treatment processes involving ozone, hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet radiation. Ozone Sci Eng 9:335–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray CA, Parsons SA (2004) Removal of NOM from drinking water: Fenton’s and photo-Fenton’s processes. Chemosphere 54(7):1017–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Galapate R, Baes A, Okada M (2001) Transformation of dissolved organic matter during ozonation: effects on trihalomethane formation potential. Water Res 35:2201–2206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Treguer R, Tatin R, Couvert A, Wolbert D, Tazi-Pain A (2010) Ozonation effect on natural organic matter adsorption and biodegradation – application to a membrane bioreactor containing activated carbon for drinking water production. Water Res 44:781–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Molnar J, Agbaba J, Dalmacija B, Tubić A, Krčmar D, Maletić S, Tomašević D (2013) The effects of matrices and ozone dose on changes in the characteristics of natural organic matter. Chem Eng J 222:435–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Irabelli A, Jasim S, Biswas N (2008) Pilot-scale evaluation of ozone vs. peroxone for trihalomethane formation. Ozone Sci Eng 30:356–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mosteo R, Miguel N, Martin-Muniesa S, Ormad M, Ovelleiro J (2009) Evaluation of trihalomethane formation potential in function of oxidation processes used during the drinking water production process. J Hazard Mater 172:661–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kusakabe K, Aso S, Hayashi J, Isomura K, Morooka S (1990) Decomposition of humic acid and reduction of trihalomethane formation potential in water by ozone with UV irradiation. Water Res 24:781–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chin A, Bérube PR (2005) Removal of disinfection by-product precursors with ozone-UV advanced oxidation process. Water Res 39(10):2136–2144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang GS, Liao CH, Chen HW, Yang HC (2006) Characteristics of natural organic matter degradation in water by UV/H2O2 treatment. Environ Technol 27(3):277–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kleiser G, Frimmel F (2000) Removal of precursors for disinfection by-products (DBPs) – differences between ozone- and OH-radical-induced oxidation. Sci Total Environ 256:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu W, Andrews SA, Sharpless C, Stefan M, Linden KG, Bolton JR (2002) Bench-scale investigations into comparative evaluation of DBP formation from different UV/H2O2 technologies. In: Proceedings of the AWWA water quality technology conference, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  30. Toor R, Mohseni M (2007) UV/H2O2 based AOP and its integration with biological activated carbon treatment for DBP reduction in drinking water. Chemosphere 66:2087–2095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarathy SR, Mohseni M (2009) UV/H2O2 treatment of drinking water: impacts on NOM characteristics, vol 11. IUVA News

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huang X, Leal M, Li Q (2008) Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes. Water Res 42(4–5):1142–1150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Uyguner CS, Bekbolet M (2009) Application of photocatalysis for the removal of natural organic matter in simulated surface and ground waters. J Adv Oxid Technol 12(1):2371–1175

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu S, Lim M, Fabris R, Chow C, Drikas M, Amal R (2008) TiO2 Photocatalysis of natural organic matter in surface water: impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation potential. Environ Sci Technol 42:6218–6223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pichat P (2013) In: Pichat P (ed) Photocatalysis and water purification: from fundamentals to recent applications. Wiley, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Brame J, Long M, Li Q, Alvarez P (2015) Inhibitory effect of natural organic matter or other background constituents on photocatalytic advanced oxidation processes: mechanistic model development and validation. Water Res 84:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Parsons S, Byrne A (2004) Water treatment applications. In: Parsons S (ed) Advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment. IWA Publishing, London, pp 329–34638

    Google Scholar 

  38. Collivignarelli C, Sorlini S (2004) AOPs with ozone and UV radiation in drinking water: contaminants removal and effects on disinfection byproducts formation. Water Sci Technol 48(4):51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (1998) Front cover, 20th edn. APHA – American Public Health Association

    Google Scholar 

  40. Camel V, Bermond A (1998) The use of ozone and associated oxidation processes in drinking water treatment. Water Res 32(11):3208–3222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Siddiqui MS, Amy GL, McCollum LJ (1996) Bromate destruction by UV irradiation and electric arc discharge. Ozone Sci Eng 18:271–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

    S. Sorlini

Authors
  1. S. Sorlini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sorlini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sciences, Public University of Navarra , Pamplona, Spain

    Antonio Gil

  2. Department of Chemistry, University of Nariño, Pasto, NARIÑO, Colombia

    Luis Alejandro Galeano

  3. Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Salamanca , Salamanca, Spain

    Miguel Ángel Vicente

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sorlini, S. (2017). Natural Organic Matter: Characterization and Removal by AOPs to Assist Drinking Water Facilities. In: Gil, A., Galeano, L., Vicente, M. (eds) Applications of Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Drinking Water Treatment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_159

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation