Skip to main content

Revenue Models for E-Learning at Universities

  • Conference paper
Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005

Abstract

This paper addresses the recent discussions on business models for e-learning. Throughout this paper, we contribute to this discussion by presenting first evidence for the sustainability of e-learning systems at universities. We discuss the cases of Learn@WU, EducaNext, and HCD-Online using a triangulation case study design and present both empirical cost structures and potential revenue models. The paper shows that there is a significant potential for revenue, but one revenue model is hardly enough to cover the cost. The size of the target audience as well as the (marketing) qualifications of the personnel have been identified as critical success factors for the sustainability of an e-learning system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberer, G., Alberer, P., Enzi, T., Ernst, G., Mayrhofer, K., Neumann, G., Rieder, R., und Simon, B.: The Learn@WU Learning Environment. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 2003-Band I, 2003: pp. 593–612.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentlage, U., Glotz, P., Hamm, I. (eds.): E-Learning — Märkte, Geschäftsmodelle, Perspektiven. Verlag Bertelsmann-Stiftung, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bentlage, U., Hummel, J.: Märkte in den USA und in Deutschland im Vergleich. In: Bentlage, U., Glotz, P., Hamm, I. (eds.): E-Learning — Märkte, Geschäftsmodelle, Perspektiven. Verlag Bertelsmann-Stiftung, 2002: pp. 121–153.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cleuvers, B. A.: Bestandsanalyse der eLearning-Angebote der Hochschulen. In: Dohmen, D. and Michel, L. P. (eds.): Marktpotenziale und Geschäftsmodelle für eLearning-Angebote deutscher Hochschulen. Bertelsmann Verlag, 2003: pp. 29–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dohmen, D.: Ergebnisse. In: Dohmen, D. and Michel, L. P. (eds.): Marktpotenziale und Geschäftsmodelle für eLearning-Angebote deutscher Hochschulen. Bertelsmann Verlag, 2003: pp. 145–206.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dohmen, D. and Michel, L. P. (eds.): Marktpotenziale und Geschäftsmodelle für eLearning-Angebote deutscher Hochschulen. Bertelsmann Verlag, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dohmen, D. und Simons, S.: Geschäftsmodelle. In: Dohmen, D. and Michel, L. P. (eds.), Marktpotenziale und Geschäftsmodelle für eLearning-Angebote deutscher Hochschulen. Bertelsmann Verlag, 2003: pp. 145–206.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duval, E.; Forte, E.; Cardinaels, K.; Verhoeven, B.; Van Durm, R.; Hendrikx, K.; Wentland Forte, M.; Ebel, N.; Macowicz, M.; Warkentyne, K.; Haenni, F.: The A riadne Knowledge Pool System. In: Communications of the ACM. 44 (2001) 5, pp. 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman, R. E: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guth, S.; Neumann, G.; Simon, B.: UNIVERSAL — Design Spaces for Learning Media. In: Sprague, Ralph H. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maui, USA 2001: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gunnarsdottir, S.; Kieslinger, B.; Küchler, T.; Simon, B.: From e-Learning to Learning Management: Results of an International Survey. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Knowledge Management. Graz, Austria, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanley, G. L.: MERLOT: Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching. In: Proceedings of Ed-Media 2003. Honolulu, USA 2003: AACE, pp. 1281–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoppe, G. und Breitner, M. H.: Business Models for E-Learning. In: Rombach, D., Eicker, S., Pohl, K., Adelsberger, H., Wulf, V., Krcmar, H., und Pawlowski, J. (eds.): Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2004 — Band 1, 2004. pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. dotLRN — An open source product to support learning and research communities. Accessed on 30 June 2004; http://dotlrn.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meier, P.; Simon, B.: Reengineering Undergraduate Teaching by Introducing Internet-based Learning Information Systems. In: Hansen, H. R.; Bichler, M.; Mahrer, H. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems. Vienna, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Norton D. and Kaplan, R.: The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pauli, W.: Betriebliche Weiterbildung. Statistik Austria. Wien, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rappa, M.: The Utility Business Model and the Future of Computing Services. In: IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2004, pp. 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. OpenACS — The Toolkit for Online Communities. Accessed on 30 June 2004; http://openacs.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Österreichische Web Analyse (ed.): Wir über uns, 2004. Accessed on 24 June 2004; http://www.oewa.at/cgi-bin/frameset.pl?1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y.: An e-Business Model Ontology for Modeling e-Business. 15th Electronic Commerce Conference e-Reality: Constructing the e-Economy, Bled, Slovenia, June 17–19, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quemada, J.; Simon, B.: A Use-Case Based Model for Learning Resources in Educational Mediators. In: Educational Technology & Society (ISSN 1436-4522). 6 (2003) 4, pp. 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider, W.: Bildung aus dem Netz — Chancen und Probleme. In: Fortmüller, R. (ed.): Komplexe Methoden, neue Medien in der Didaktik der Ökonomie. Manz Verlag Schulbuch, Wien, 2002: pp. 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simon, B.; König, C.: EducaNext Service Evaluation. Vienna, Austria 2004: Accessed on 24 June 2004; http://www.educanext.org/educanext-eb-service-evaluation-2004-06-22.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simon, B.; Dolog, P.; Miklós, Z.; Olmedilla, D.; Sintek, M.: Conceptualizing Smart Spaces for Learning. In: Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2004 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simon, B., E. Duval, and D. Massart. 2004. Simple Query Interface Specification: Accessed on 24 June 2004; http://nm.wu-wien.ac.at/e-learning/inter/sqi/sqi.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seufert, S.: E-Learning Business Models, Strategies, Success Factors and Best Practice Examples. In: R. De Fillippi, R. W. (ed.): Rethinking Management Education. Information Age Press, Greenwich, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Simon, B.; König, C.: EducaNext Service Evaluation. Vienna, Austria 2004: http://www.educanext.org/educanext-eb-service-evaluation-2004-06-22.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stake, R. E.: The art of case study research. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, USA. Sage Publications, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  30. Timmers, P.: Electronic Markets: Strategies and Models for Business-to-Business Trading. Wiley, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Timmers, P.: Business Models for Electronic Markets. In: Journal of Electronic Markets, 8(2): pp. 3–8, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tripple.net (ed.): Ad-locator Statistikdatenbank 05/2004. Accessed on 24 June 2004; http://www.tripple.net/ad-locator/stats.asp

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wirtz, B. und Kleineicken, A.: Geschäftsmodelltypologien im Internet. WiSt. 11:628–634. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yin, R. K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, USA. Sage Publications, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mendling, J., Neumann, G., Pinterits, A., Simon, B. (2005). Revenue Models for E-Learning at Universities. In: Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J., Eckert, S., Isselhorst, T. (eds) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1624-8_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics