Abstract
In this paper the two international comparative studies IEA TIMSS and OECD PISA have been discussed by comparing their similarities and differences. A number of examples have been presented to demonstrate how findings in various areas are relevant to help improve science education. Focus are on students’ conceptual understanding, gender and school differences, relations to home background factors, and on what characteristics of instruction that seem to be related to high achievement. Furthermore, the assessment frameworks for the two studies are argued to be of influential importance in its own terms, but that any influence on national aims and curricula should be carefully considered only in a national context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Angell, C., Kjærnsli, M. & Lie, S. (2000). Exploring Student Responses on Free-Response Science Items in TIMSS. In: Shorrocks-Taylor, D. & Jenkins, E.W. (Eds.): Learning from Others. International Comparisons in Education. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 159–187.
Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzales, E. J., Smith, T. A. & Kelly, D. L. (1996). Science Achievement in the Middle School Years. IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Boston: TIMSS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Grønmo, L.S., Kjærnsli, M. & Lie, S. (2004): Looking for Cultural and Geographical Factors in Patterns of Responses to TIMSS Items. Paper to the 1st IEA International research Conference, Lefkosia, Cyprus, May, 2004
Kjærnsli, M., Lie, S., Stokke, K.H. & Turmo, A. (1999): Hva i all verden kan elevene i naturfag? Oppgaver med resultater og kommentarer. (What in the world can the students in science? Items with results and comments. In Norwegian). ILS. University of Oslo.
Kjærnsli, M., Angell, C. & Lie, S. (2002). Exploring Population 2 students’ ideas about science. In: Robitaille, D.F. & Beaton, A.E. (eds.): Secondary Analysis of the TIMSS Data. Dordrecht/ Boston/ London. Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 127–144.
Kjærnsli, M. & Molander, B. O. (2003): Scientific literacy: Content Knowledge and Process Skills. In Lie, S., Linnakylä & Roe, A. (eds.): Northern Lights on PISA. Unity and Diversity in the Nordic countries. Oslo: ILS, University of Oslo.
Jenkins, E.W. (2000): Making Use of International Comparisons of Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics. In: Shorrocks-Taylor, D. & Jenkins, E.W. (Eds.): Learning from Others. International Comparisons in Education. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 137–157.
Lie, S., Taylor, A., & Harmon, M. (1996). Scoring techniques and criteria. In M. O. Martin & D. Kelly (Eds.), Third International Mathematics and Science Study technical report. Volume 1: Design and development. Boston.: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gregory, K. D., Hoyle, C. & Shen, S. (2000): Effective Schools in Science and Mathematics. IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Boston: TIMSS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Smith, T.A., Garden, R.A., Gregory, K.D., Gonzales, E.J., Chrostowski, S.J. & O’Connor, K.M. (2001). TIMSS Assessment and Specifications 2003. Boston: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Orpwood, G. (2000). Diversity of Purpose in International Assessments: Issues arising from the TIMSS Tests of Mathematics and Science. In: Shorrocks-Taylor, D. & Jenkins, E.W. (Eds.):Learning from Others. International Comparisons in Education. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 49–62.
OECD (2000). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills. The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. Paris: OECD Publications
OECD (2001) Knowledge and Skills for Life. First results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD Publications.
Pelgrum, W.J. & Plomp, T. (2002): Indicators of ICT in Mathematics: Status and Covariation with Achievement measures. In: Robitaille, D.F. & Beaton, A.E. (eds.): Secondary Analysis of the TIMSS Data. Dordrecht/Boston/London. Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 317–330.
Schmidt, W.H., Raizen, S., Britton, E., Bianchi, L.J., & Wolfe, R.G. (1997). Many visions, many aims, Volume 2. A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school science. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Turmo, A. & Lie, S. (2004) Hva kjennetegner norske skoler som skårer høyt i PISA2000? (What characterize Norwegian schools with high scores in PISA 2000? In Norwegian). Acta Didactica nr 1/2004. Oslo: ILS, University of Oslo.
Välijärvi, J. & Malin, A. (2003): The two-level effect of socio-economic background. In Lie, S., Linnakylä, P. & Roe, A. (eds.): Northern Lights on PISA. Unity and Diversity in the Nordic Countries in PISA 2000, p. 123–132. Oslo: ILS, University of Oslo.
Zabulionis, A. (2001). Similarity of mathematics and science achievement of various nations. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 9(33).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lie, S. (2005). How Can Large International Comparative Studies Contribute to the Quality of Science Education?. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3672-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3673-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)