Skip to main content
Log in

The University of Manitoba Psychiatry Toolkit: Development and Evaluation

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The authors developed and measured the subsequent utilization of a web-based point-of-care information tool and meta-search filter, the University of Manitoba Psychiatry Toolkit, as well as conduct an evaluation of its impact on physicians’ information seeking.

Methods

Evaluation entailed analysis of toolkit web page utilization data from user visits to the web-based toolkit, as well as an online survey distributed to psychiatrists and resident trainees to assess information gathering behaviors and attitudes regarding various sources of medical information.

Results

Electronic resources and colleagues were the preferred sources for gathering health information, while inadequate time and search skills were ranked as important barriers. Age and physician cadre influenced toolkit use. Majority of respondents used the Psychiatry Toolkit to answer a clinical question, and urgency of the clinical problem influenced their decision to use it.

Conclusions

The Psychiatry Toolkit assists psychiatrists and residents in finding answers to clinical questions arising at point-of-care, helping enhance the ongoing educational needs of physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Duran-Nelson A, Gladding S, Beattie J, et al. Should we Google it? Resource use by internal medicine residents for point-of-care clinical decision making. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):788–94. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdb7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Addison J, Whitcombe J, Glover SW. How doctors make use of online, point-of-care clinical decision support systems: a case study of UpToDate©. Health Inf Libr J. 2012;30:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein BA, Tannery NH, Wessel CB, et al. Development of a clinical information tool for the electronic medical record: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98(3):223–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan PS. The impact of the acquisition of electronic medical texts on the usage of equivalent print books in an academic medical library. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2010;5:5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hopkins ME, Summers-Ables JE, Clifton SC, et al. Website creation and resource management: developing collaborative strategies for asynchronous interaction with library users. Health Info Libr J. 2010;28:130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Research and Markets (2011). Psychiatrist Information Seeking Report 2011. http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/1870468/.

  7. Cook DA, Sorensen KJ, Wilkinson JM, et al. Barriers and decisions when answering clinical questions at the point of care: a grounded theory study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(21):1962–9. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop L, Duggan N, Flynn H. Teaching family medicine residents how to answer clinical questions using QUIPs. Can Med Educ J. 2013;4(2):e4–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Masters K. For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:4–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms K. Corver for her administrative support. We acknowledge the initial input from Dr. J. Littleford who suggested the development of the Psychiatry Toolkit. Parts of this paper were presented at the 63rd Annual Scientific Conference of the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA 2013), Ottawa, ON, September 28, 2013. The lead author (AA) acknowledges the receipt of a Health Sciences Centre Medical Staff Council Research Award for 2013–2015 in support of this research. All authors acknowledge the ongoing support of the Department of Psychiatry and The Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report regarding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Fleisher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adeponle, A., Skakum, K., Cooke, C. et al. The University of Manitoba Psychiatry Toolkit: Development and Evaluation. Acad Psychiatry 40, 608–611 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0419-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0419-5

Keywords

Navigation