Abstract
Effects of pre-sowing electric field treatment were studied in Phaseolus mungo on water absorbing capacity of seeds, percentage of germination, α-amylase activity and gibberellic acid content of germinating seeds, and chlorophyll content and superoxide dismutase activity of leaves. Considerable enhancement was observed in all the parameters studied with increase in electric field dose. Cellular receptors of plants respond to voltage of certain magnitude and causes physiological and biochemical changes. Use of electric field in pre-sowing seed treatment for crop improvement is a novel idea for positive modulation of plant potential and consequent enhancement of productivity as very little information is available in this regard. The present investigation deals with the effect of electric field on seed germination, growth and biochemical changes of P. mungo aiming at possible augmentation of its productivity in future.
References
Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24(1), 1–15.
Beauchamp, C., & Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 44, 276–287.
Bhattacharya, R., & Barman, P. (2013). 132 kV High voltage power transmission line and stress on Brassica juncea. IJECT, 4, 140–142.
Chakravarty, M., & Sadhu, T. K. (2003). Electric field, a tool for presowing seed treatment to germination and seedling vigour of some vegetable seeds. Indian Agriculture, 47(3& 4), 273–280.
Efthimiadou, A., Katsenios, N., Karkanis, A., Papastilianou, P., Triantafyllidis, V., Travalos, I., & Bialis, D.J. (2014). Effects of pre-sowing pulsed electromagnetic treatment of tomato seeds on growth, yield and lycopene content. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 369745. doi:.10.1155/2014/369745
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, A. (1963). Statistical tables for biological, medical and agricultural research. Edinburgh, London: Oliver and Boyd.
Ghosh, S., & Sadhu, T. K. (2007). Influence of electric field and ion composition of the media on root growth pattern of rice seedling. Indian Agriculture, 51(3&4), 181–184.
Glenn, J. L., Kuo, C. C., Durley, R. C., & Pharis, R. P. (1972). Purification of plant hormone extracts by gel permeation chromatography. Phytochemistry, 11(1), 345–351.
Hamid, A., Amal, M. E., & Mohamed, H. I. (2014). The effect of the exogenous gibberelic acid on two salt stressed barley cultivars. European Scientific Journal, 10(6), 228–245.
Madamanchi, N. R., Donahue, J. V., Cramer, C. L., Alscher, R. G., & Pederson, K. (1994). Differencial response of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase in two pea cultivars during a short term exposer to sulphur dioxide. Plant Molecular Biology, 26, 95–103.
Mahajan, T. S., & Pandey, O. P. (2014). Effect of electric field (at different temperatures) on germination of chickpea seed. African Journal of Biotechnology, 13(1), 61–67.
Nelson, S. O. (2010). Fundamentals of dielectric properties measurements and agricultural applications. Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 44, 98–113.
Obata-Sasamoto, H., & Suzuki, H. (1979). Activity of enzymes relating to starch synthesis and endogenous level of growth regulators of potato stolon tips during tuberization. Physiologia Plantarum, 45, 320–324.
Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2010). Plant Physiology (5th ed.). Sinauer Associates Inc., Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A.
van Ginkel, J. H., & Sinnaeve, J. (1980). Determination of total nitrogen in plant material with Nessler’s reagent by continuous flow analysis. The Analyst, 105, 1199–1203.
Yang, L. & Shen, H. L. (2011). Effect of electrostatic field on seed germination and seedling growth of Sorbus pohuashanensis. Journal of Forestry Research, 22(1), 27–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biswas, D., Sadhu, T.K. & Bhattacharyya, R. Effect of pre-sowing electric field treatment of the seeds on some physiological parameters of Phaseolus mungo L.. Ind J Plant Physiol. 21, 366–369 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-016-0232-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-016-0232-5