Abstract
Purpose
We examined, retrospectively, the efficacy of voriconazole in Fusarium eye infections.
Methods
Voriconazole-treated patients with proven or probable keratitis or endophthalmitis from the voriconazole database (9 patients) and six French ophthalmology departments (15 patients) were included. Sociodemographic features, predisposing factors, history of corneal trauma, associated ocular conditions, other diseases and prior therapies were analysed. Investigator-determined success was defined as infection resolution with medical treatment. Failure was no response or persistent infection and required surgery.
Results
Most patients were Caucasian (83 %) and male (71 %). The infection was keratitis (63 %) or endophthalmitis (37 %) and proven in 23 (96 %). Prior therapy included topical and/or systemic amphotericin (46 %), fluconazole (17 %) or others (33 %), often in combination. Causative fungi were Fusarium solani (14, 58 %), Fusarium moniliforme (1), Fusarium oxysporum (1) and Fusarium spp. (8). Voriconazole was administered systemically, topically and/or by intraocular injection, and 16 patients (67 %) received salvage and eight primary therapy. The overall response was 67 % (73 % keratitis and 56 % endophthalmitis) but seven patients required adjunctive surgery. However, response was 63 % for eight primary therapy patients and 69 % for 16 salvage therapy patients. Response by species was Fusarium solani 64 % (9/14) and all others 80 % (8/10). In 13 patients (77 %), voriconazole was used in combination (response 69 vs. 64 % alone) with topical [amphotericin B 10/24 (42 %), caspofungin 5 (21 %), natamycin 1 (4 %)] and systemic agents [caspofungin 3 (13 %), amphotericin 2 (8 %)].
Conclusions
Topical and systemic voriconazole appears to be effective alone or in combination with other agents for treating severe Fusarium keratitis or endophthalmitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xie L, Zhong W, Shi W, Sun S. Spectrum of fungal keratitis in north China. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1943–8.
Chang DC, Grant GB, O’Donnell K, et al. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. JAMA. 2006;296:953–63.
Nucci M, Anaissie E. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:695–704.
Tuft SJ, Tullo AB. Fungal keratitis in the United Kingdom 2003–2005. Eye. 2009;23:1308–13.
Rondeau N, Bourcier T, Chaumeil C, et al. Fungal keratitis at the Centre Hospitalier National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts: retrospective study of 19 cases. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2002;25:890–6.
Senthilkumari S, Lalitha P, Prajna NV, et al. Single and multidose ocular kinetics and stability analysis of extemporaneous formulation of topical voriconazole in humans. Curr Eye Res. 2010;35:953–60.
Shen YC, Wang CY, Tsai HY, Lee HN. Intracameral voriconazole injection in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis resulting from keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:916–21.
Lau D, Leung L, Ferdinands M, et al. Penetration of 1 % voriconazole eye drops into human vitreous humour: a prospective, open-label study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37:197–200.
Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, Holz ER, et al. Determination of vitreous, aqueous, and plasma concentration of orally administered voriconazole in humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:42–7.
Vemulakonda GA, Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, Prince RA, Shah GK, Van Gelder RN. Aqueous and vitreous concentrations following topical administration of 1 % voriconazole in humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:18–22.
Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, Lin TK, Sponsel WE, Graybill JR. Voriconazole in the treatment of fungal eye infections: a review of current literature. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:871–8.
Riddell J 4th, Comer GM, Kauffman CA. Treatment of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis: focus on new antifungal agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:648–53.
Prajna NV, Mascarenhas J, Krishnan T, et al. Comparison of natamycin and voriconazole for the treatment of fungal keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:672–8.
Arora R, Gupta D, Goyal J, Kaur R. Voriconazole versus natamycin as primary treatment in fungal corneal ulcers. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39:434–40.
Tu EY. Alternaria keratitis: clinical presentation and resolution with topical fluconazole or intrastromal voriconazole and topical caspofungin. Cornea. 2009;28:116–9.
Bunya VY, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ, Ayres BD, Cohen EJ. Topical and oral voriconazole in the treatment of fungal keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:151–3.
Klont RR, Eggink CA, Rijs AJ, Wesseling P, Verweij PE. Successful treatment of Fusarium keratitis with cornea transplantation and topical and systemic voriconazole. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:e110–2.
Cakir M, Imamoğlu S, Cekiç O, et al. An outbreak of early-onset endophthalmitis caused by Fusarium species following cataract surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34:988–95.
Durand ML, Kim IK, D’Amico DJ, et al. Successful treatment of Fusarium endophthalmitis with voriconazole and Aspergillus endophthalmitis with voriconazole plus caspofungin. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:552–4.
Reis A, Sundmacher R, Tintelnot K, Agostini H, Jensen HE, Althaus C. Successful treatment of ocular invasive mould infection (fusariosis) with the new antifungal agent voriconazole. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:932–3.
Bang S, Edell E, Eghrari AO, Gottsch JD. Treatment with voriconazole in 3 eyes with resistant Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:66–9.
Schuster FL, Guglielmo BJ, Visvesvara GS. In-vitro activity of miltefosine and voriconazole on clinical isolates of free-living amebas: Balamuthia mandrillaris, Acanthamoeba spp., and Naegleria fowleri. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2006;53:121–6.
Tu EY, Joslin CE, Shoff ME. Successful treatment of chronic stromal Acanthamoeba keratitis with oral voriconazole monotherapy. Cornea. 2010;29:1066–8.
Tan K, Brayshaw N, Tomaszewski K, Troke P, Wood N. Investigation of the potential relationships between plasma voriconazole concentrations and visual adverse events or liver function test abnormalities. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46:235–43.
Kadikoy H, Barkmeier A, Peck B, Carvounis PE. Persistent photopsia following course of oral voriconazole. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2010;26:387–8.
Al-Badriyeh D, Neoh CF, Stewart K, Kong DC. Clinical utility of voriconazole eye drops in ophthalmic fungal keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4:391–405.
Bullock JD. An outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with contact lens use in the northeastern United States. Cornea. 2008;27:973–4.
Gaujoux T, Borsali E, Goldschmidt P, et al. Fungal keratitis in France. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:e215–6.
Rao SK, Lam PT, Li EY, Yuen HK, Lam DS. A case series of contact lens-associated Fusarium keratitis in Hong Kong. Cornea. 2007;26:1205–9.
Perfect JR, Marr KA, Walsh TJ, et al. Voriconazole treatment for less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1122–31.
Lortholary O, Obenga G, Biswas P, et al. International retrospective analysis of 73 cases of invasive fusariosis treated with voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:4446–50.
Stanzani M, Tumietto F, Vianelli N, Baccarani M. Update on the treatment of disseminated fusariosis: focus on voriconazole. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3:1165–73.
Dupuis A, Tournier N, Le Moal G, Venisse N. Preparation and stability of voriconazole eye drop solution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:798–9.
Breit SM, Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, Shah GK, Mills MD, Grand MG. Management of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis with voriconazole and caspofungin. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:135–40.
Oude Lashof AML, Rothova A, Sobel JD, et al. Ocular manifestations of candidemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:262–8.
Kernt M, Kampik A. Intracameral voriconazole: in vitro safety for human ocular cells. Toxicology. 2009;258:84–93.
Kernt M, Neubauer AS, De Kaspar HM, Kampik A. Intravitreal voriconazole: in vitro safety-profile for fungal endophthalmitis. Retina. 2009;29:362–70.
Lau D, Fedinands M, Leung L, et al. Penetration of voriconazole, 1 %, eyedrops into human aqueous humor: a prospective open-label study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:343–6.
Galarreta DJ, Tuft SJ, Ramsay A, Dart JK. Fungal keratitis in London: microbiological and clinical evaluation. Cornea. 2007;26:1082–6.
Espinel-Ingroff A, Johnson E, Hockey H, Troke P. Activities of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B in vitro against 590 moulds from 323 patients in the voriconazole Phase III clinical studies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:616–20.
Azor M, Cano J, Gené J, Guarro J. High genetic diversity and poor in vitro response to antifungals of clinical strains of Fusarium oxysporum. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:1152–5.
Azor M, Gené J, Cano J, Guarro J. Universal in vitro antifungal resistance of genetic clades of the Fusarium solani species complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1500–3.
Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Jones RN; SENTRY Participants Group. Antifungal activities of posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole compared to those of itraconazole and amphotericin B against 239 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. and other filamentous fungi: report from SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2000. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1032–7.
Funding
P.T. received an honorarium from Pfizer in connection with the data finalisation, analysis and writing of this manuscript. G. O. was paid consultant to Pfizer for the collection of the French Mycosis Group data for this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
P. T. was previously an employee of and then a consultant to Pfizer; G.O. none to declare; T.G. none to declare; P.G. none to declare; A.-L.B. none to declare; M. C. none to declare; F. G. has received speaker fees from Schering and MSD; D. P. none to declare; S. R. none to declare; K. S. none to declare; V. B. none to declare; O. L. is a member of the speaker bureaus of Pfizer, MSD, Astellas and Gilead Sciences. Pfizer had no decision-making role in the design, execution, analysis or reporting of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Troke, P., Obenga, G., Gaujoux, T. et al. The efficacy of voriconazole in 24 ocular Fusarium infections. Infection 41, 15–20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-012-0273-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-012-0273-2