Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Natural Selection: What Concept of Selection?

  • Thematic Issue Article: How Evolutionary is Evolutionary Economics?
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article examines two cases of adoption of evolutionary ways of thinking by modern economists: Nelson and Winter’s (Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, 1982), and evolutionary game theory (1990s and after). In both cases, the authors explicitly refer to natural selection in an economic context. I show that natural selection is taken in two different senses, which correspond to two general conceptions of the principle of natural selection, one of which contains reproduction and heredity as key elements, whereas the other does not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A rather harsh debate ensued about whether such an ecological concept of natural selection is useful. Lewontin (1970, 2009), for instance, has expressed serious doubts: without reproduction and heritability, there is only a process of differential elimination, not an indefinite and open process of transformation.

  2. Except in the last few years, evolutionary economics has been neglected by philosophers of biology. See, however, Callebaut (1983), Rosenberg (1994); Gayon (1999, 2009a).

  3. This is why this approach is said to be “eductive.” “Eductive” contrasts with “adaptive.” An eductive approach postulates that rational agents, following a reasoning process, can deduce that an equilibrium should occur. The time necessary for a real agent to come to this conclusion is not taken into account. Adaptive learning operates in real time..

  4. This is an allusion to the philosopher David Lewis (1941–2001). In his book Convention (1969), Lewis makes use of the notion of “common knowledge.” An example of common knowledge would be that everyone knows p, and everyone knows that everyone knows p. Walliser’s expression “Lewisian hand” refers to an equilibrium guided by the existence of a common knowledge. If economic agents adjust their behavior through learning, their behavior may converge to something “rational” in the economist’s sense of the word, as a result of the “common knowledge” that they come to share.

  5. In simple terms, a group of players is in a Nash equilibrium if each one is making the best decision that he or she can, taking into account the decisions of the others.

References

  • Alchian A (1950) Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. J Pol Econ 58:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore K, Samuelson L (1991) Evolutionary stability in repeated games played by finite automata. J Econ Theory 57:278–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blandin P (2007) L’écosystème existe-t-il? Le tout et la partie en écologie. In: Martin T (ed) Le tout et les parties dans les systèmes naturels. Vuibert, Paris, pp 21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F (2007) Évolution d’écosystèmes sans réduction à la fitness des parties. In: Martin T (ed) Le tout et les parties dans les systèmes naturels. Vuibert, Paris, pp 57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F (2008) Causal processes, fitness, and the differential persistence of lineages. Philos Sci 7:560–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut W (1983) Contribution to a general theory of rationality on evolutionary foundations, with an application to the organization of scientific knowledge (in Dutch). PhD Thesis, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Belgium

  • Gayon J (1998) Darwinism’s struggle for survival: heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon J (1999) Sélection naturelle biologique et sélection naturelle économique: examen d’une analogie. Économies et Sociétés 35:107–126

  • Gayon J (2009a) De l’économie à la biologie et retour: la sélection naturelle. In: Martin T (ed) L’unité des sciences aujourd’hui. Vuibert, Paris, pp 13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon J (2009b) Actualité du darwinisme. Bull Soc Fr Philos 103:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J (2000a) Reproduction and the reduction of genetics. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: Historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 240–285

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J (2000b) Development, culture, and the units of inheritance. Phil Sci 67:S348–S368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesourne J, Orléan A, Walliser B (2002) Leçons de microéconomie évolutionniste. Odile Jacob, Paris. (English: Evolutionary microeconomics, Springer, Berlin, 2006)

  • Lewis D (1969) Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (2009) Postface. In: Martin T, Huneman P, Lecointre G, Silberstein M (eds), Les mondes darwiniens: l’évolution de l’évolution. Syllepses, Paris, pp 1076–1080

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1988) Evolutionary progress and the levels of selection. In: Nitecki M (ed) Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1997) From replicators to reproducers: the first major transitions leading to life. J Theor Biol 187:555–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie AJ (2009) Evolutionary game theory. In: Zalta EN (ed) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2010 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-evolutionary/. Accessed 1 July 2012

  • Nelson RR (1994) Evolutionary theorizing about economic change. In: Smelser N, Swedberg R (eds) Economic sociology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 8–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2007) Cultural inheritance and Fisher’s “fundamental theorem” of natural selection. Biol Theory 2:290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1886) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity and panmixia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 187:253–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price GR (1972) Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Ann Hum Genet 35:485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A (1994) Does evolutionary theory give comfort or inspiration to economics? In: Mirowski P (ed) Natural images in economic thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 384–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A, Bouchard F (2004) Fitness, probability and the principles of natural selection. Br J Philos Sci 55:693–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen L (1991) Biotal evolution: a manifesto. Evol Theory 10:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser B (1994) L’intelligence de l’économie. Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser B (1998) A spectrum of equilibration processes in game theory. J Evol Econ 8:67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walliser B (2000) L’économie cognitive. Odile Jacob, Paris. (English: Cognitive economics, Springer, Berlin 2008)

  • Walliser B (2011) Learning versus evolution: from biology to game theory. Biol Theory. doi:10.1007/s13752-012-0071-1

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Abigail Lustig for her fruitful comments and careful linguistic revision of this paper, which would not be what it is without her help. Thanks also to the anonymous reviewer for her fruitful comments and queries.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Gayon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gayon, J. Economic Natural Selection: What Concept of Selection?. Biol Theory 6, 320–325 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0042-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0042-6

Keywords

Navigation