Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of forest management on the amount of deadwood in Mediterranean oak ecosystems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annals of Forest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Deadwood is an important habitat for vertebrate and invertebrate species, a key factor in the nutrient cycle and a valuable carbon pool. Difference in the deadwood C stock depends on many variables such as forest type, microclimate and forest management.

Aims

We investigated the relationship between C stock in deadwood and forest management in oak stands of southern Italy.

Methods

Deadwood C stock was quantified in 74 forest stands under intensive, extensive or multifunctional management. The relationship between management and C stock in deadwood was assessed taking into account the decay class and the type of deadwood (snags, stumps and logs).

Results

Intensively managed forests are characterized by significantly lower mean levels of deadwood C than the other forms of management. Multifunctional management resulted in the highest level of C, mainly in logs and snags, while extensive management resulted in high levels of C storage concentrated in snags.

Conclusion

Results of the research highlight that forest management practices greatly influence the quantitative and qualitative presence of deadwood in forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barreca L, Cutini A, Mercurio R (2008) Caratterizzazione della necromassa in boschi di farnetto (Quercus frainetto Ten.) della Calabria. Forest 5:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobiec A (2002) Living stands and dead wood in the Białowieża forest: suggestions for restoration management. For Ecol Manag 165:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg DC, Kershner JL (1999) Coarse woody debris in riparian zones. J For 4:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (2002) Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environ Pollut 116:363–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell MGR (1984) Woody biomass of forest stands. For Ecol Manag 8:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes DA, Allen RB, Sčoty NA, Goulding C, Beets P (2002) Designing systems to monitor carbon stocks in forests and shrublands. For Ecol Manag 164:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini G, Bellotti A, Mancino G, Borghetti M, Ferrara A (2006) Carta Forestale della Basilicata. INEA

  • Di Cosmo L, Gasparini P, Paletto A, Nocetti M (2013) Deadwood basic density values for national-level carbon stock estimates in Italy. For Ecol Manag 295:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvall MD, Grigal DF (1999) Effects of timber harvesting on coarse woody debris in red pine forests across the Great Lakes states, U.S.A. Can J For Res 29:1926–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2006) European forest types. EEA Technical Report 9, Luxembourg, 111 p

  • FAO (2004) Global Forest Resources Assessment Update 2005. Terms and definitions. FRA Programme Working Paper 83/E, Rome, 35 p

  • Fridman J, Walheim M (2000) Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For Ecol Manag 131:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Führer E (2000) Forest functions, ecosystem stability and management. For Ecol Manag 132:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green P, Peterken GF (1997) Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK in relation to the intensity of management. For Ecol Manag 98:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann U, Moroni MT, Makeschin F (2009) Deadwood abundance in Labrador high-boreal black spruce forests. Can J For Res 39:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gegory SW, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromak K, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms JA (1998) The dictionary of forestry. Society of American Foresters, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero C, Krankina O, Monleon VJ, Bravo F (2014) Amount and distribution of coarse woody debris in pine ecosystem of north-western Spain, Russia and the United States. IForest 7:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holub SM, Spears JDH, Lajtha K (2001) A reanalysis of nutrient dynamics in coniferous coarse woody debris. Can J For Res 31:1894–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter ML (1990) Wildlife, forests and forestry. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • INFC (2007) Le stime di superficie 2005. Autori: Tabacchi G, De Natale F, Di Cosmo L, Floris A, Gagliano C, Gasparini P, Genchi L, Scrinzi G, Tosi V, Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio. MiPAF–Corpo Forestale dello Stato - Ispettorato Generale, CRA - ISAFA, Trento. Available at: http://www.infc.it

  • Jönsson MT, Jonsson BG (2007) Assessing coarse woody debris in Swedish woodland key habitats: implications for conservation and management. For Ecol Manag 242:363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KJ, Reid CM, Thomas RC, Goldsmith FB (1998) Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. J Appl Ecol 35:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krankina ON, Harmon ME (1994) The impact of intensive forest management on carbon stores in forest ecosystems. World Res Rev 6:161–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruys N, Fries C, Jonsson BG, Lämås T, Ståhl G (1999) Wood-inhabiting cryptogams on dead Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees in managed Swedish boreal forests. Can J For Res 29:178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kueppers LM, Southon J, Baer P, Harte J (2004) Dead wood biomass and turnover time, measured by radiocarbon, along a subalpine elevation gradient. Oecologia 141:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • La Fauci A, Mercurio R (2008) Caratterizzazione della necromassa in cedui di castagno (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Aspromonte. Forest 5:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi F, Lasserre B, Tognetti R, Marchetti M (2008) Deadwood in relation to stand management and forest type in Central Apennines (Molise, Italy). Ecosyst 11:882–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marage D, Lemperiere G (2005) The management of snags: a comparison in managed and unmanaged ancient forests of the Southern french Alps. Ann For Sci 62:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti M, Lombardi F (2006) Analisi quali-quantitativa del legno morto in soprassuoli non gestiti: il caso di “Bosco Pennataro”, Alto Molise. L’Italia Forestale e Montana 4:275–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason F, Nardi G, Whitmore D (2005) Recherches sur la restauration des habitats du bois mort: l’exemple du LIFE “Bosco della Fontana” (Italie). In: Vallauri D, André J, Dodelin B, Eynard-Machet R, Rambaud D (eds) Bois mort et à cavités, une clé pour des forêts vivantes. Éditions Tec & Doc, Paris, pp 285–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G (1993) The carbon content of trees. Forestry Commission Technical Paper 4, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, 21 p

  • Merganičová K, Merganič J, Svoboda M, Bače R, Šebeň V (2012) Deadwood in forest ecosystems. In: Blanco JA, Lo YH (eds) Forest Ecosystems – More than Just Trees, InTech Book: pp 81–108

  • Montes F, Cañellas I, Montero G (2004) Characterisation of coarse woody debris in two Scots pine forests in Spain. In: Marchetti M (ed) Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe—from ideas to operationality, vol 51, EFI Proceedings., pp 171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Næsset E (1999) Relationship between relative wood density of Picea abies logs and simple classification systems of decayed coarse woody debris. Can J For Res 14:454–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordén B, Ryberg M, Götmark F, Olausson B (2004) Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biol Conserv 117:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunery JS, Keeton WS (2010) Forest carbon storage in the northeastern United States: net effects of harvesting frequency, post-harvesting retention, and wood products. For Ecol Manag 259:1363–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paletto A, Tosi V (2010) Deadwood density variation with decay class in seven tree species of the Italian Alps. Scand J For Res 25:164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paletto A, Ferretti F, Cantiani P, De Meo I (2012a) Multi-functional approach in forest landscape management planning: an application in Southern Italy. For Syst 21:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Paletto A, Ferretti F, De Meo I, Cantiani P, Focacci M (2012b) Ecological and environmental role of deadwood in managed and unmanaged forests. In: Diez JJ (ed) Sustainable Forest Management, InTech book: pp 219–238

  • Pedlar JH, Pearce JL, Venier LA, McKenney DW (2002) Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada. For Ecol Manag 158:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti G, De Natale F, Gasparini P, Paletto A (2009) Il legno morto nei boschi italiani secondo l’Inventario Forestale Nazionale. Forest 6:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen ES (2004) Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Glob Change Biol 10:2052–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu S (2006) The ecological role of deadwood in natural forests. Environ Sci Eng 3:137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravindranath NH, Ostwald M (2008) Carbon inventory methods. Handbook for greenhouse gas inventory. Springer, Carbon Mitigation and Roundwood Production Projects

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rock J, Badeck FW, Harmon ME (2008) Estimating decomposition rate constants for European tree species from literature sources. Eur J For Res 127:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondeux J, Sanchez C (2010) Review of indicators and field methods for monitoring biodiversity within national forest inventories. Core variable: Deadwood Environ Monit Assess 164:617–630

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rouvinen S, Rautiainen A, Kouki J (2005) A relation between historical forest use and current dead woody material in a boreal protected old-growth forest in Finland. Silva Fenn 39:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström F, Petersson H, Kruys N, Ståhl G (2007) Biomass conversion factors (density and carbon concentration) by decay classes for dead wood of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. in boreal forests of Sweden. For Ecol Manag 243:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S, Wilk M (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 49:11–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollins P, Cline SP, Verhoven T, Sachs D, Spycher G (1987) Patterns of log decay in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Can J For Res 17:1585–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokland JN, Tomter SM, Söderberg U (2004) Development of dead wood indicators for biodiversity monitoring: experiences from Scandinavia. In: Marchetti M (ed) Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe—from ideas to operationality, vol 51, EFI Proceedings., pp 207–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Teissier du Cros R, Lopez S (2009) Preliminary study on the assessment of deadwood volume by French national forest inventory. Ann For Sci 66:302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JW (2002) Dead Wood: from Forester’s Bane to Environmental Boon. In: Laudenslayer WF Jr, Shea PJ, Valentine BE, Weatherspoon CP, Lisle TE (eds), Proceedings of the symposium on ecology and management of deadwood in western forests, Reno, NV. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-181, pp 3–9

  • Tobin B, Black K, McGurdy L, Nieuwenhuis M (2007) Estimates of decay rates of components of coarse woody debris in thinned Sitka spruce forests. Forestry 80:455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travaglini D, Barbati A, Chirici G, Lombardi F, Marchetti M, Corona P (2007) ForestBIOTA data on deadwood monitoring in Europe. Plant Biosyst 141:222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallauri D, André J, Blondel J (2003) Le bois mort, une lacune des forêt gérérs. Rev For Fr 2:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk PJ, Lindner M, Zanchi G, Zudin S (2011) Assessing impacts of intensified biomass removal on deadwood in European forests. Ecol Indic 11:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell KL (2002) Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive inventories. Ecol Indic 1:139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zell J, Kändler G, Hanewinkel M (2009) Predicting constant decay rates of coarse woody debris—a meta-analysis approach with a mixed model. Ecol Model 220:904–912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Paletto.

Additional information

Handling Editor:

Andreas Bolte

Contribution of the co-authors

Alessandro Paletto and Isabella De Meo analysed the data and wrote the paper; Paolo Cantiani and Fabrizio Ferretti designed the research and experiment and supervised the work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paletto, A., De Meo, I., Cantiani, P. et al. Effects of forest management on the amount of deadwood in Mediterranean oak ecosystems. Annals of Forest Science 71, 791–800 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0377-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0377-1

Keywords

Navigation