Abstract
Objective
The optimal primary intervention for treatment of clinically localized high-grade prostate cancer remains to be identified. The present investigation compares disease control in patients treated with primary radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiotherapy (RT).
Methods
Eligible patients were identified by Gleason 8–10 prostate adenocarcinoma at biopsy between 2003 and 2010, treated with either primary RP or RT. Patients with PSA ≥30 or clinically evident seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement at diagnosis or follow-up ≤24 months were excluded. Contemporary definitions of disease recurrence were employed.
Results
Between 2003 and 2010, 116 patients with Gleason 8–10 prostate cancer were identified, of whom 87 were eligible for the present analysis (41 RP, 46 RT + HT). Excepting age (RP younger), demographic factors were similar between groups. Three RP patients received immediate post-operative RT. All but one RT patient received hormone therapy (hereafter, RT + HT; median 27.5 months; 85 % >12 months, 30 % >30 months). At a median follow-up of 54 months (similar between groups), 39 patients had experienced disease recurrence (30 RP, 9 RT + HT). Estimated 5-year disease control was superior for RT + HT (21 vs. 74 %; p < 0.001), without difference in cancer-specific survival (89 vs. 95 %; p = 0.844).
Conclusion
RT + HT-based treatment of high-grade prostate cancers demonstrates superior disease control compared with RP, without impact on disease-specific survival at 5 years. Further investigation is warranted in order to identify subset patient populations who may experience differential benefit from each approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walsh PC, DeWeese T, Eisenberger MA (2007) Localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2696–2705
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines): prostate cancer. Version 1.2015. http://nccn.org. Accessed 03-May-2015
Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB et al (2007) Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology 69:1095–1101
Oefelein MG, Grayhack JT, McVary KT (1995) Survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy of men with clinically localized high grade carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 76:2535–2542
Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J et al (2009) Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 181:956–962
Bolla M, van Poppel H, Collette L et al (2005) Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 366:572–578
Horwitz EM, Bae K, Hanks GE et al (2008) Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2497–2504
Bolla M, Van Tienhoven G, Warde P et al (2010) External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study. Lancet Oncol 11:1066–1073
Roach M, Hanks G, Thames H et al (2006) Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormone therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO phoenix consensus conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:965–974
Do TM, Parker RG, Smith RB et al (2001) High-grade carcinoma of the prostate: a comparison of current local therapies. Urology 57:1121–1127
Arcangeli G, Strigari L, Arcangeli S et al (2009) Retrospective comparison of external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy in high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:975–982
Lau WK, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML et al (2002) Radical prostatectomy for pathologic Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables. J Urol 167:117–122
Bernard JR, Buskirk SJ, Heckman MG et al (2010) Salvage radiotherapy for rising prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: dose-response analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:735–740
Wiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U et al (2009) Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol 27:2924–2930
Swanson GP, Hussey MA, Tangen CM et al (2007) Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794. J Clin Oncol 25:2225–2229
Trock BJ, Han M, Freedland SJ et al (2008) Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 299:2760–2769
Stephenson AJ, Shariat SF, Zelefsky MJ et al (2004) Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 291:1325–1332
Valicenti RK, Gomella LG, Ismail M et al (1999) The efficacy of early adjuvant radiation therapy for pT3N0 prostate cancer: a matched pair analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:53–58
Hagan M, Zlotecki R, Medina C et al (2004) Comparison of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy policies for postprostatectomy radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:329–340
Leibovich BC, Engen DE, Patterson DE et al (2000) Benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with a positive surgical margin. J Urol 163:1178–1182
Corrazini C, Bolgnesi A, Ceresoli GL et al (2004) Role of postoperative radiotherapy after pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: a single institute experience of 415 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:674–683
Tewari A, Divine G, Chang P et al (2007) Long-term survival in men with high grade prostate cancer: a comparison between conservative treatment, radiation therapy, and radical prostatectomy—a propensity scoring approach. J Urol 177:911–915
Foley KA, Keith SW, Trabulsi EJ et al (2012) Physician beliefs and practices for adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e233–e238
Quek RGW, Ward KC, Master VA et al (2015) Association between urologist characteristics and radiation oncologist consultation for patients with locoregional prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13:303–309
Acknowledgments
Dr. Patricia Watkins provided statistical analysis and support for the present investigation.
Ethical statement
Institutional review board exemption from a full board review was obtained prior to research commencement. This article does not involve experimental intervention with human or animal subjects.
Statement of informed consent
Owing to the retrospective nature of this chart review study and reporting of non-protected health information, the institutional review boards approved this study with exemption for retrospective acquisition of informed consent.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding source(s)
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watkins, J.M., Watkins, P.L., Dufan, T.A. et al. High-grade prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason Score ≥8): survival and disease control following radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy plus long-course hormone therapy. J Radiat Oncol 4, 277–282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0199-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0199-2