Abstract
This paper sets up a scenario about Rebecca, a jobseeker, who is a fictitious composite, a "typical" candidate who wants a position at a college/university. A job description is provided. She interviews for the advertised position, and while doing so, she also interviews the university, school/department, and working environment to see if there is a match with her goals. She goes about her own interviewing using observational, interactive, and analytic approaches, which are described. Rebecca had to clarify her goals in terms of interdisciplinarity, collegiality, and the kind of community that she ideally wants. She found shortfalls between what was advertised and the actual program and also the setting in which she ideally would like to work. This is problematic for her, but she is pragmatic and knows she needs a job. The scenario ends with Rebecca exploring her options. This paper will be of interest to anyone seeking an environmental job in academia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of University Women (2011) The simple truth about the gender pay gap. http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/SimpleTruthAboutPayGap.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2011
Arsanjani MH (1981) Internal regulation of internal resources: a study of law and policy. University of Virginia, Charlottesville
Brunner RD (1997) Raising standards: a prototypical strategy for undergraduate education. Pol Sci 30:167–189
Brunner RD (2006) A paradigm for practice. Pol Sci 39:135–167
Boyer EL (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton
Chronicle of Higher Education (2011) AAUP Faculty Salary Survey. http://chronicle.com/stats/aaup/. Accessed 16 Dec 2011.
Clark SG, Wallace R (2010) Learning interdisciplinary problem-solving skills and leadership skills: a comparison of four designs. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Report, New Haven, 14:171–298
Clark SG et al (2011a) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 1): integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world? Environ Manag 47:701–715
Clark SG et al (2011b) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 2): strategies for improvement. Environ Manag 47:716–726
Clark SG et al (2011c) Professional development of interdisciplinary scholars. Jour Envi Stud Sci. doi:10.1007/s13412-011-0018-z
Clark SG, Mattson DJ (2011) Human dignity and diversity training: clarifying standards and practices. Mother Pelican 7(6), Online
Corning P (2011) The fair society: the science of human nature and the pursuit of social justice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Curtis JW (2011) Persistent inequity: gender and academic employment. Prepared for “New Voices in Pay Equity” An Event for Equal Pay Day, April 11, 2011 American Association of University Professors. http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/NewVoicesPayEquity_JohnCurtis.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2011.
Daft RL (1983) Organizational theory and design. West Publishing Company, St. Paul
Dewey J (1910) How we think. DC Health & Co, Lexington, MA
Glassick CE, Humber MT, Maeroff GI (1997) Scholarship accessed: evaluation of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton
Harrison R, Stokes H (1992) Diagnosing organizational culture. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, New York
Jantsch E (1970) Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a system approach to education and innovation. Policy Sci 1:403–428
Kegan R (1994) In over our heads: the mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
King PM, Kitchener KS (1994) Developing reflective judgment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Kockelmans JJ (ed) (1979) Interdisciplinarity and higher education. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
Kronman AT (2007) Education’s end. Yale University Press, New Haven
Lasswell HD (1971) A pre-view of policy sciences. Elsevier, New York
Lattuca LR (2001) Creating interdisciplinarity: interdisciplinarity research and teaching among college and university faculty. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville
Mackler S (2010) From the positivist to the hermeneutic university: restoring the place of meaning and liberal education in higher education. Policy Futures in Educ 8(2):178–191
Mattson DJ, Clark SG (2011) The human dignity in concept and practice. Pol Sci 44:303–320
Miller RC (1981) Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences: a 1981 overview. Issues Integr Stud 1982:1–37
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2007) Re-thinking science: knowledge and he public in the age of uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge
Nussbaum MC (1997) Cultivating humanity: a classic defense of reform in liberal education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Pfirman S (ed) (2011) Interdisciplinary hiring and career development: guidance for individuals and institutions. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, DC, Report to the Council of Environmental Deans and Directors (CEDD)
Petrie HG (1976) Do you see what I see? The epistemology of interdisciplinary inquiry. Educ Res 5:9–15
Pielke RA Jr (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York
Reisman M (1995) A jurisprudence from the perspective of the “political superior. Kentucky Law Review 23:605–627
Sandel MJ (2009) Justice: what’s the right thing to do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York
Schon DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
Schon DA (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Segal D (2011) What they don’t teach law students: lawyering. New York Times CLXI (55,595): 1
Steelman TA, DuMond ME (2009) Serving the common interest in U.S. forest policy: a case study of the Healthy Forest Restoration Act. Enviro Manag 43:396–410
Szostak R (2007) Modernism, postmodernism, and interdisciplinarity. Issues Integ Stud 25:32–83
Tetlock PE et al (1992) Assessing group dynanics: a test of the groupthink model. Jour Personality and Soc Pysch 63:403–425
Tierney WG (1988) Organizational culture in higher education: defining the essentials. Jour Higher Education 59(1):2–22
University of Southern California (2011) University Committee on Appointments, Promotions and Tenure, Stanford Center for Learning and Teaching, http://ctl.standford.edu. Accessed 28 Feb 2012
Williams J (2012) Deconstructing academe. Chronicle of Higher Education, February 12, 2012.
Yalom ID (1980) Existential psychotherapy. Basic Books, New York
Acknowledgments
We want to thank the AESS professional society, its leaders and members, and the many students, friends, and colleagues we have had over the years. We thank many colleges, universities, and institutions for providing the opportunity to develop and apply our scholarship skills. Finally, we thank our many coworkers. Denise Casey, Angela Orthmeyer, Laura Bozzi, Rebecca Steinberg, Elizabeth Nichols, April James, Melissa McHale, Sara Smiley Smith, and Naomi Krogman offered critical advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, S.G., Steelman, T.A. Interviewing for an interdisciplinary job: principled goals, pragmatic outcomes, and finding the right fit in academia. J Environ Stud Sci 3, 21–29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0075-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0075-y