Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality assessment of systematic reviews of health care interventions using AMSTAR

  • Research Brief
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Appraisal of the methodological quality of systematic reviews would reflect on their utility for the clinicians and policymakers. This study was done to assess the quality of systematic reviews published in five leading Indian medical journals using AMSTAR. 22 systematic reviews of healthcare interventions were identified. The scores ranged 0 to 10 (mean 3.77 and median 2.5), 9 reviews scored > 4/11. Most frequent ‘yes’ and ‘no’ scores were: publication status as an inclusion criterion (12 / 22), respectively and duplicate study selection and data extraction (17 /22). Several suboptimal aspects of methodological quality were identified in the reviews evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Systematic Review definition in HTA 101: Glossary; National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology (NICHSR). Available at URL www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hta101/ta101014.html. Accessed on 3 February, 2010.

  2. Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Schmid CH. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. BMJ 1995;310:1085–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, Campbell K, Ben Perot L, Berman B. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr. 2002:2;3.

  4. Jadad A, Moher M, Browman G, Booker L, Sigouin C, Fuentes M. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ. 2000;320: 537–540.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, et al. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One. 2007:2: e1350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Available on: www.rxforchange.ca. Accessed on 3 February, 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UKCC (Bahrain Branch) and Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Box 25438, Awali, Bahrain

    Vanitha A. Jagannath, Joseph L. Mathew, G. V. Asokan & Zbys Fedorowicz

  2. Department of Paediatrics, KIMS Bahrain Medical Center, Um al Hassam Ave, Adliya, PO Box, 175829, Manama, Bahrain

    Vanitha A. Jagannath

Authors
  1. Vanitha A. Jagannath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph L. Mathew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. V. Asokan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zbys Fedorowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanitha A. Jagannath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jagannath, V.A., Mathew, J.L., Asokan, G.V. et al. Quality assessment of systematic reviews of health care interventions using AMSTAR. Indian Pediatr 48, 383–385 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0080-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0080-3

Key words

Search

Navigation