Abstract
The present study was conducted to determine the fate of manuscripts rejected by Indian Pediatrics (IP), and to identify the factors facilitating publication of a rejected manuscript elsewhere. Database (PubMed, IndMed) and Google searches were performed to trace the manuscripts published elsewhere any time after rejection by Indian Pediatrics in the year 2002. Eighteen per cent of the rejected submissions (62 out of 347) were eventually (till July 2009) published elsewhere. These manuscripts subsequently appeared in 33 different journals; Indian Journal of Pediatrics published the maximum numbers (n=22). Seventy four per cent of the rejected papers were published in journals with a impact factor lesser than Indian Pediatrics. Rejection before initiating peer-review, and rejection on the grounds of over-interpretation of results or poor statistical analysis diminished the chances of subsequent publication, whereas manuscripts rejected on grounds of poor originality or poor language had greater chances of being published elsewhere. Rejection of a manuscript by IP does not preclude publication, but rejected manuscripts are published more often in non-pediatric journals or journals with a lower impact factor, although the occasional exception exists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rubin HR, Redelmeier DA, Wu AW, Steinberg EP. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:255–258.
Maddox J. Conflicts of interest declared. Nature 1992;360:205.
Scharschmidt BF, DeAmicis A, Bacchetti P, Held MJ. Chance, concurrence and clustering: analysis of reviewers’ recommendations on 1000 submissions to the Journal of Clinical Investigation. J Clin Invest 1994;94:1877–1880.
Yadollahie M, Roshanipoor M, Habibzadeh F. The agreement in reports of peer reviews in the Iranian Journal of Medical Science. Saudi Med J 2004;25:S44.
Bornmann L, Daniel HD. The extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Journal of Informetrics 2009;3:348–352.
Gupta P, Kaur G, Sharma B, Shah D, Choudhury P. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria of rejection. Indian Pediatr 2006;43:479–489.
Journal Citation Reports: Science edition 2008; Available from: http://jcrweb.com. Accessed: 25 February, 2010.
Opthof T, Furstner F, van Geer M, Coronel R. Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts. Cadiovasc Res 2000;45:255–258.
Silberzweig JE, Khorsandi AS. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:1620–1623.
Liesegang TJ, Shaikh M, Crook JE. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:551–560.
Green R, Del Mar C. The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician. Aust Fam Physician 2006;35:655–656.
Chew FS. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:627–632.
Mundy DJ. Time needed for publication of journal articles. Ann Intern Med 1984;101:61–62.
Polk HC Jr. An editor’s perspective of the future for peer-reviewed traditional surgical journals. Am J Surg 1991;161:309–311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dewan, P., Gupta, P. & Shah, D. Fate of articles rejected by Indian Pediatrics . Indian Pediatr 47, 1031–1035 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-010-0178-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-010-0178-z