Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Active rotor control for helicopters: motivation and survey on higher harmonic control

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Aeronautical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the early helicopter developments, these aircraft have made a tremendous progress in performance, handling qualities, comfort and efficiency. However, modern helicopters still suffer from many problems that hinder a further increase in their efficiency, acceptance and hence their market share. The high level of vibrations and the noise generated by the rotor are the most important reasons for this. While vibrations are a concern of pilot and passenger comfort, they also give rise to an increase in maintenance efforts and costs. The high noise level limits the acceptance of helicopters in the public, e.g. landing of helicopters on or close to hospitals during EMS missions. High noise levels also lead to an early aural detection during military missions. Further drawbacks of helicopters are the high fuel consumption in high speed forward flight due to the excessive power required, the limited speed of flight, the low range for the same reason, low lead-lag damping, etc. To alleviate these drawbacks of helicopters, active rotor control technologies have been investigated for a long time. Many different approaches have been investigated and most of them are not being followed any more. First investigations started with so-called Higher Harmonic Control (HHC) which has been replaced by Individual Blade Control (IBC). The paper gives a survey of the typical problems and explains the vibration and noise issues in more detail. Since active means have to compete with passive ones, such methods are also briefly addressed. Next, the paper gives a review on important HHC achievements. Due to space constraints, the paper mainly focuses on wind tunnel and flight test results. A second paper reviews IBC and gives an outlook on the idea of the swashplateless helicopter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.easa.europa.eu/ws_prod/c/c_tc_noise.php.

  2. In August 1972, the US Army cancelled Lockheed’s compound helicopter programme AH-56A Cheyenne.

  3. June 2010.

References

  1. Reichert, G.: Helicopter vibration control—a survey. Vertica 5(1), 1–20 (1981)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Loewy, R.G.: Helicopter vibrations: a technological perspective. J AHS 29(4), 4–30 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braun, D.: Development of antiresonance force isolators for helicopter vibration reduction. J AHS 27(4), 37 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Konstanzer, P., Enenkl, B., Aubourg, P.-A., Cranga, P.: Recent advances in Eurocopter’s passive and active vibration control. In: 64th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Montreal, Canada, April 29–May 1, 2008

  5. Strehlow, H.: Vibrationsverhalten der Hubschrauber, CCG-Kurs LR 2.01 (1987)

  6. Goldmann, D.E.: A review of subjective responses to vibratory motion of the human body in the frequency range 1 to 70 cycles per second. Naval Medical Research Institute Report Project NM004 001, Report No. 1, 1948

  7. N.N.: Directive 2002/44/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 25 June 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration), Brussels, Belgium, 25 June 2002

  8. Veca, A.C.: Vibration effects on helicopter reliability and maintainebility, UAAMRDL TR 73-11 (1973)

  9. Leverton, J.W., Pike, A.C.: Helicopter noise—what is important from a community prospective. In: 63rd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Soceity, Virginia Beach, VA, 2007

  10. ICAO: Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation—Environmental Protection, Volume I—Aircraft Noise (2008)

  11. Prieur, J., Splettstoesser, W.R.: ERATO: an ONERA-DLR cooperative programme on aeroacoustic rotor optimisation. In: 25th European Rotorcraft Forum, Rome, Italy, September 14–16, 1999

  12. Leishman, J.G.: Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kessler, C.: Active rotor control for helicopters: individual blade control and swashplateless rotor designs. In: 36th European Rotorcraft Forum, Paris, France, September 7–9, 2010

  14. Richter, P., Eisbrecher, H.-D.: Design and first flight tests of individual blade control actuators. In: 16th European Rotorcraft Forum, Glasgow, Scotland, September 18–20, 1990

  15. Steward, W.: Second harmonic control on the helicopter rotor. In: Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, Nr. 2997, 1952

  16. Payne, P.R.: Higher harmonic rotor control: the possibilities of third and higher harmonic feathering for delaying the stall limit in helicopters. Aircr Eng 30(8), 222–226 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arcidiacono, P.J.: Theoretical performance of helicopters having second and higher harmonic feathering control. J AHS 6(8), 8–19 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wernicke, R.K., Drees, J.M.: Second harmonic control. In: 19th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Soceity, Washington D.C., May 1–3, 1963

  19. Sissingh, G.J., Donham, R.E.: Hingeless rotor theory and experiment on vibration reduction by periodic variation of conventional controls. In: American Helicopter Soceity/NASA Specialist Meeting on Rotorcraft Dynamics, Moffett Field, CA, February 13–15, 1974

  20. Wood, E.R, Powers, R.W.: Practical design considerations for a flightworthy higher harmonic control system. In: 36th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Soceity, Washington, D.C., May 13–15, 1980

  21. Wood, E.R, Powers, R.W., Hammond, C.E.: On methods for application of higher harmonic control. In: 4th European Rotorcraft Forum, Stresa, Italy, September 13–15, 1978

  22. Hammond, C.E.: Wind tunnel results showing rotor vibratory loads reduction using higher harmonic blade pitch. J AHS 28(1), 10–15 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Molusis, J.A., Hammond, C.E., Cline, J.H.: A unified approach to the optimal design of adaptive and gain scheduled controllers to achieve minimum helicopter rotor vibration. In: 37th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Soceity, New Orleans, LA, May 17–20, 1981

  24. Wood, E.R., Powers, R.W., Cline, J.H., Hammond, C.E.: On developing and flight testing a higher harmonic control system. J AHS 30(1), 3–20 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yen, J.G.: Higher harmonic control for helicopters with two-bladed and four-bladed rotors. J Aircr 18(12), 1064–1069 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw, J., Albion, N.: Active control of the helicopter rotor for vibration reduction. J AHS 26(3), 32–39 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shaw, J., Albion, N., Hanker Jr, E.J., Teal, R.S.: Higher harmonic control: wind tunnel demonstration of fully effective vibration hub force suppression. J AHS 34(1), 14–25 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Leary, J., Miao, W.: Design of higher harmonic control for the ABC. J AHS 27(1), 52–57 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  29. du Val, R.W., Gregory Jr, C.Z., Gupta, N.K.: Design and evaluation of a state-feedback vibration controller. J AHS 29(3), 30–37 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lehmann, G.: The effect of higher harmonic control (HHC) on a four-bladed hingeless model rotor. Vertica 9(3), 273–284 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kube, R.: New aspects of higher harmonic control on a four-bladed hingeless model rotor. J AHS 37(3), 61–68 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Splettstoesser, W.R., Lehmann, G., van der Wall, B.G.: Initial results of a model rotor higher harmonic control (HHC) Wind Tunnel Experiment on BVI Impulsive Noise Reduction. In: 15th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 12–15, 1989

  33. Achache, M., Polychroniadis, M.: Development of an experimental systems for active control of vibrations on helicopters—development methodology for an Airborne System. Vertica 11(1/2), 123–138 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Polychroniadis, M.: Generalized higher harmonic control ten years of Aerospatial experience, Vertica, vol. 11, No. 1/2, pp. III.7.2.1–III.7.2.9 (1987)

  35. Miao, W., Kottapalli, S.B.R., Freye, H.M.: Flight Demonstration of higher harmonic control (HHC) on S-76. In: 42nd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Soceity, Washington, DC, June 2–4, 1986

  36. Nygen, K.P., Schrage, D.P.: Fixed-gain versus adaptive higher harmonic control simulation. J AHS 34(3), 51–58 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nguyen, K., Chopra, I.: Application of higher harmonic control to rotors operating at high speed and thrust. J AHS 35(3), 78–89 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brooks, T.F., Booth Jr, E.R.: The effects of higher harmonic control on blade-vortex interaction noise and vibration. J AHS 38(3), 45–55 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Splettstoesser, W.R., Schultz, K.-J., Kube, R., Brooks, T.F., Booth Jr, E.R., Niesl, G., Streby, O.: A higher harmonic control test in the DNW to reduce impulsive BVI noise. J AHS 39(4), 3–13 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Murashige, A., Kobiki, N., Tsuchihashi, A., Nakamura, H., Inagaki, K., Yamakawa, E.: ATIC aeroacoustic model rotor test at DNW. In: 24th European Rotorcraft Forum, Marseille, France, September 15–17, 1998

  41. Murashige, A., Kobiki, N., Tsuchihashi, A., Inagaki, K., Tsujiuchi, T., Hasegawa, Y., Nakamura, H., Yamamoto, Y., Yamakawa, E.: Second ATIC aeroacoustic model rotor test at DNW. In: 26th European Rotorcraft Forum, The Hague, Netherlands, September 26–29, 2000

  42. Splettstoesser, W.R., Kube, Seelhorst, U., Wagner, W., Boutier, A., Micheli, F., Mercker, E., Pengel, K.: Higher harmonic control aeroacoustic test (HART)—test documentation and representative results. DLR Report IB 129–95/28, 1995

  43. Splettstoesser, W.R., Kube, Seelhorst, U., Wagner, W., Boutier, A., Micheli, F., Mercker, E., Pengel, K.: Key results from a higher harmonic control aeroacoustic rotor test (HART) in the German-Dutch wind tunnel. In: 21st European Rotorcraft Forum, Saint Petersburg, Russia, August 30–September 1, 1989

  44. van der Wall, B.G., Burley, C.L., Yu, Y.H., Richard, H., Pengel, K., Beaumier, P.: The HART II test-measurement of helicopter rotor wakes. Aerosp Sci Technol 8(4), 273–284 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ch. Kessler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kessler, C. Active rotor control for helicopters: motivation and survey on higher harmonic control. CEAS Aeronaut J 1, 3–22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-011-0005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-011-0005-9

Keywords

Navigation