Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving Grounded Spatial Language Strategies

  • Technical Contribution
  • Published:
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Each natural language phrase is evidence for a particular strategy of construing reality. One domain where this has been extensively studied is spatial language, which reveals an enormous amount of variation of conceptualization strategies both within a particular language and cross-culturally. This paper proposes a computational formalism for representing conceptualization strategies and shows how the formalism can be used to study and explain the evolution and emergence of spatial conceptualization strategies and their impact on shared grounded communication systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Obviously, there is more to the system than we have space to explain here. In particular, German requires the handling of complex syntactic phenomena such as morphology and complex word classes, and semantic ambiguity that fall beyond this paper (see [16, 18] for a detailed discussion).

  2. α is given by the experimenter and in all experiments described here α=0.5.

References

  1. Bleys J (2010) Language strategies for the domain of colour. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

  2. Bleys J, Loetzsch M, Spranger M, Steels L (2009) The grounded color naming game. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (Ro-man 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cangelosi A (2010) Grounding language in action and perception: from cognitive agents to humanoid robots. Phys Life Rev 7(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Beule J, Bergen B (2006) On the emergence of compositionality. In: Cangelosi A, Smith ADM, Smith K (eds) The evolution of language (Evolang 6). World Scientific, Singapore, pp 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fujita M, Kuroki Y, Ishida T, Doi T (2003) Autonomous behavior control architecture of entertainment humanoid robot SDR-4X. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 960–967

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson-Laird PN (1977) Procedural semantics. Cognition 5(3):189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirby S (2002) The evolution of language. Artif Life 8:185–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levinson SC (1996) Language and space. Annu Rev Anthropol 25(1):353–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levinson SC (2003) Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Language, culture and cognition, vol 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Levinson SC, Wilkins D (2006) Grammars of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Mainwaring S, Tversky B, Ohgishi M, Schiano D (2003) Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spat Cogn Comput 3(1):3–42

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marocco D, Cangelosi A, Nolfi S (2003) The emergence of communication in evolutionary robots. Philos Trans R Soc, Math Phys Eng Sci 361(1811):2397

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith K, Brighton H, Kirby S (2003) Complex systems in language evolution: the cultural emergence of compositional structure. Adv Complex Syst 6(4):537–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith K, Kirby S, Brighton H (2003) Iterated learning: a framework for the emergence of language. Artif Life 9(4):371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spranger M (2008) World models for grounded language games. German diploma thesis. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

  16. Spranger M (2011) The evolution of grounded spatial language. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

  17. Spranger M (2012) The co-evolution of basic spatial terms and categories. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in cultural language evolution. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 111–141

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spranger M, Loetzsch M (2011) Syntactic indeterminacy and semantic ambiguity: a case study for German spatial phrases. In: Steels L (ed) Design patterns in fluid construction grammar. Constructional approaches to language, vol 11. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 265–298

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spranger M, Steels L (2012) Emergent functional grammar for space. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in cultural language evolution. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 207–232

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spranger M, Loetzsch M, Pauw S (2010) Open-ended grounded semantics. In: Coelho H, Studer R, Woolridge M (eds) Proceedings of the 19th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI 2010). Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 929–934

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spranger M, Loetzsch M, Steels L (2012) A perceptual system for language game experiments. In: Steels L, Hild M (eds) Language grounding in robots. Springer, Berlin, pp 89–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Spranger M, Pauw S, Loetzsch M, Steels L (2012) Open-ended procedural semantics. In: Steels L, Hild M (eds) Language grounding in robots. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Steels L (1995) A self-organizing spatial vocabulary. Artif Life 2(3):319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Steels L (2000) The emergence of grammar in communicating autonomous robotic agents. In: Horn W (ed) ECAI 2000: proceedings of the 14th European conference on artificial intelligence. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 764–769

    Google Scholar 

  25. Steels L (2002) Grounding symbols through evolutionary language games. In: Simulating the evolution of language. Springer, New York, pp 211–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Steels L (2007) The recruitment theory of language origins. In: Lyon C, Nehaniv C, Cangelosi A (eds) The emergence of communication and language. Springer, Berlin, pp 129–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Steels L, Hild M (eds) (2012) Language grounding in robots. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steels L, Spranger M (2012) Emergent mirror systems for body language. In: Steels L (ed) Experiments in cultural language evolution. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 87–109

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tenbrink T (2007) Space, time, and the use of language: an investigation of relationships. Cognitive linguistics research, vol 36. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tenbrink T (2011) Reference frames of space and time in language. J Pragmat 43(3):704–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vogt P (2006) Overextensions and the emergence of compositionality. In: Cangelosi A, Smith ADM, Smith K (eds) The evolution of language (Evolang 6). World Scientific, Singapore, pp 364–371

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vogt P, Divina F (2007) Social symbol grounding and language evolution. Interact Stud 8(1):31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am greatly indebted to Masahiro Fujita and Hideki Shimomura for supporting this research. I thank Simon Pauw, Martin Loetzsch, Wouter van den Broeck, Joris Bleys and Luc Steels who have made contributions to aspects of IRL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Spranger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spranger, M. Evolving Grounded Spatial Language Strategies. Künstl Intell 27, 97–106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-013-0245-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-013-0245-4

Keywords

Navigation