Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Evaluation Methodology for Longitudinal Studies of Short-Term Cancer Research Training Programs

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The need to familiarize medical students and graduate health professional students with research training opportunities that cultivate the appeal of research careers is vital to the future of research. Comprehensive evaluation of a cancer research training program can be achieved through longitudinal tracking of program alumni to assess the program’s impact on each participant’s career path and professional achievements. With advances in technology and smarter means of communication, effective ways to track alumni have changed. In order to collect data on the career outcomes and achievements of nearly 500 short-term cancer research training program alumni from 1999–2013, we sought to contact each alumnus to request completion of a survey instrument online, or by means of a telephone interview. The effectiveness of each contact method that we used was quantified according to ease of use and time required. The most reliable source of contact information for tracking alumni from the early years of the program was previous tracking results, and for alumni from the later years, the most important source of contact information was university alumni records that provided email addresses and telephone numbers. Personal contacts with former preceptors were sometimes helpful, as were generic search engines and people search engines. Social networking was of little value for most searches. Using information from two or more sources in combination was most effective in tracking alumni. These results provide insights and tools for other research training programs that wish to track their alumni for long-term program evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jimmy R, Palatty PL, D’Silva P, Baliga MS, Singh A (2013) Are medical students inclined to do research? J Clin Diagn Res 7(12):2892–5. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/6698.3786, PMID: 24551667

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D (2003) Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med 51(3):149–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khadaroo RG, Rotstein OD (2002) Are clinician-scientists an endangered species? Barriers to clinician-scientist training. Clin Invest Med 25(6):260–1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Culliton BJ, D’Auria J (1998) The physician-scientist really is an endangered species. J Investig Med 46(9):417–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mostafa SR, Khashab SK, Fouaad AS, Abdel Baky MA, Waly AM (2006) Engaging undergraduate medical students in health research: students’ perceptions and attitudes, and evaluation of a training workshop on research methodology. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 81(1–2):99–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Oliveira NA, Luz MR, Saraiva RM, Alves LA (2011) Student views of research training programmes in medical schools. Med Educ 45(7):748–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burgoyne LN, O’Flynn S, Boylan GB (2010) Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online 10:15. doi:10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212, PMID: 20844608

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nikkar-Esfahani A, Jamjoom AA, Fitzgerald JE (2012) Extracurricular participation in research and audit by medical students: opportunities, obstacles, motivation and outcomes. Med Teach 34(5):e317–24. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.670324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farooq Sheikh AS, Sheikh SA, Kaleem A, Waqas A. Factors contributing to lack of interest in research among medical students Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013; 4: 237–243. Published online Nov 7, 2013. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S51536 PMCID: PMC3826903.

  10. Committee C, Institute for International Medical Education (2002) Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach 24(2):130–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leonard JC, Ellsbury KE (1996) Gender and interest in academic careers among first- and third-year residents. Acad Med 71(5):502–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. She L, Wu B, Xu L, Wu J, Zhang P, Li E (2008) Determinants of career aspirations of medical students in southern China. BMC Med Educ 8:59

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Naqvi HA (2010) Students’ research: tradition ahead of its time. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 20(10):701–2. doi:10.2010/JCPSP.701702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harsha Kumar H, Jayaram S, Kumar GS, Vinita J, Rohit S, Satish M, Shusruth K, Nitin A (2009) Perception, practices towards research and predictors of research career among UG medical students from coastal south India: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Community Med 34(4):306–9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Langhammer CG, Garg K, Neubauer JA, Rosenthal S, Kinzy TG (2009) Medical student research exposure via a series of modular research programs. J Investig Med 57(1):11–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zier K, Wyatt C, Muller D (2012) An innovative portfolio of research training programs for medical students. Immunol Res 54(1-3):286–291. doi:10.1007/s12026-012-8310-x, Review. PMID: 22418729

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunskaar S, Breivik J, Siebke M, Tømmerås K, Figenschau K, Hansen JB (2009) Evaluation of the medical student research programme in Norwegian medical schools. A survey of students and supervisors. BMC Med Educ 9:43

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. National Institutes of Health. Types of grant funding. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/funding_program.htm#Resource Accessed on October 30, 2014.

  19. Heimburger DC, Waterbor J, Fish L, Brooks CM (2000) Cancer prevention and control training program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. J Cancer Educ 15(2):69–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heimburger DC, Waterbor JW, Fish L, Brooks CM (2000) An interdisciplinary training program in nutrition sciences and cancer. J Cancer Educ 15(3):130–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daniel CL, Brooks CM, Waterbor JW (2011) Approaches for longitudinally tracking graduates of NCI-funded short-term cancer research training programs. J Cancer Educ 26:58–63

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Desmond RA, Padilla LA, Daniel C, Prickett, CT, Venkatesh R, Brooks CM, and Waterbor, JW. Career outcomes of graduates of R25E short-term cancer research training programs. [Submitted]

  23. Drupal Content management system: http://www.drupal.org; Webform module: https://www.drupal.org/project/webform; Webform Encryption Module: https://www.drupal.org/project/webform_encrypt; MCRYPT: http://php.net/manual/en/book.mcrypt.php; MySQL Database: http://www.mysql.com/. Accessed on October 31, 2014.

  24. Wikipedia: Google search. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Search. Accessed on October 28, 2014.

  25. Hipaaspace. http://www.hipaaspace.com/medical_billing/coding/billing_code_lookup_services.aspx. Accessed on October 30, 2014

  26. Wikipedia: Facebook. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook. Accessed on October 28, 2014.

  27. LinkedIn: World’s Largest Professional Network. https://www.linkedin.com/. Accessed on October 30, 2014.

  28. Instructional Assessment Resources: response rates. http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/teaching/gather/method/survey-Response.php. Accessed on October 30, 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank our website manager Mr. Gregory Caudle of the UAB School of Public Health for his invaluable contributions, and Charles T. Prickett, M.P.H., for his assistance managing data from our earlier study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Waterbor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padilla, L.A., Venkatesh, R., Daniel, C.L. et al. An Evaluation Methodology for Longitudinal Studies of Short-Term Cancer Research Training Programs. J Canc Educ 31, 84–92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0758-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0758-z

Keywords

Navigation