Abstract
This paper describes the sources of variability encountered in the use of an expert panel to review cancer-related knowledge items, necessary for medical students. Variability was observed in the interpretation of written material relating to the definition and rationale for the task to be completed by individual panel members, including the definition of a junior doctor, and levels of understanding and specificity. Panel sessions undertaken in phase II provided facilitated discussion and the ability to clearly define the aims and tasks required of participants, resulting in data of a higher quality. Consensus was achieved in a single session that would have likely taken several iterations of individual data collection to achieve. Eliminating phase I has the potential to remove the majority of variability encountered in this study. Subsequently, the resultant decrease in time demanded of participants would likely result in higher recruitment and participation rates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barton MB, Tattersall MH, Butow PN et al (2003) Cancer knowledge and skills of interns in Australia and New Zealand in 2001: comparison with 1990, and between course types. Med J Aust 178(6):285–289
Smith WT, Tattersall MH, Irwig L et al (1991) Undergraduate education about cancer. Eur J Cancer 27(11):1448–1453
Starmer DL, Barton MB (2009) Advances in cancer management: at what cost to medical student education? J Cancer Educ 24(3):233–237
Oncology Education Committee (2007) Ideal oncology curriculum for medical schools. retrieved from: http://www.cancer.org.au/policy/Publications/IdealOncology.htm. Accessed 4 March 2007
Starmer DL, Chapman E, Millward MJ (2010) Applying global frameworks to assessment in medical education: an example of a nationally produced curriculum for cancer education. J Cancer Educ 25(2):285–289
Starmer DL, Chapman E, Millward MJ (2013) Using expert panels to determine the level of cancer knowledge required of junior doctors in Australia. part 1: methodology and results. doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0440-2
Starmer DL, Chapman E, O'Donoghue TA, et al. (2008) Cancer-related attributes assessment protocol: consultation document. The University of Western Australia
Barton MB, Bell P, Sabesan S et al (2006) What should doctors know about cancer? Undergraduate medical education from a societal perspective. Lancet Oncol 7:596–601
Gaffan J, Dacre J, Jones A (2006) Educating undergraduate medical students about oncology: a literature review. J Clin Oncol 24:1932–1939
Meijler WJ, van Heest F, Otter R et al (2005) Educational needs of general practitioners in palliative care: outcome of a focus group study. J Cancer Educ 20(1):28–33
Starmer DL. (2006) Undergraduate cancer education: a cross-sectional survey of Australian and New Zealand medical graduates [Master's thesis]. The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Professors Kirsten Auret and Michael Barton for their feedback on a draft version of the consultation document and to the clinicians who participated in this study.
Conflict of interest
Darren Starmer currently chairs the Cancer Council Australia’s Oncology Education Committee, which authored the Ideal Oncology Curriculum for Medical Students, which was used in this research
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Starmer, D.L., Chapman, E. & Millward, M.J. Using Expert Panels to Determine the Level of Cancer Knowledge Required of Junior Doctors in Australia. Part 2: Sources of Variability. J Canc Educ 28, 66–69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0449-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0449-6