Abstract
This study examined how the moral value of ‘respecting elders’ was constructed in the interaction between parents and young children between 3 and 5 years of age. The everyday conversations between parent- child dyad were subjected to discourse analysis. The analysis suggested that in the parent–child everyday interaction what on the surface appears to be the selfless moral value of ‘respecting elders’ carried an alternate implied meaning. It seemed that the value of ‘respecting elders’ is contingent on some favours or other gains, rather than being just by virtue of ‘age’. The conclusion drawn from discourse analysis was later also validated by means of semi-structured interview of the parents. In this paper the focus is primarily on the discursive part of the study, nevertheless the data of the interview helps in establishing how parents actually conceptualized the value of ‘respecting elders’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anandalakshmi, S. (1994). The girl child and the family: An action research study. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.
Du Bois, J. W. (1991). Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics, 1, 71–106.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chadha, N., & Misra, G. (2006). Prosocial reasoning and behaviour among Indian children: a naturalistic study. Psychology and Developing Societies, 18(2), 167–199.
Dixon, S. V., Graber, J. A., & Gunn, J. B. (2008). The roles of respect for parental authority and parenting practices in parent–child conflict among African American, Latino, and European American families. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 1–10.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2015). Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.
Greenfield, P. M., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1994). Cross-cultural roots of minority development. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Haidt, J., &Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus Fall, 55–66.
Harwood, R. L., Miller, J. G., & Lucca Irizarry, N. (1995). Culture and attachment. Perceptions of the child in context. New York: Guilford Press.
Harwood, R. L., Leyendecker, B., Carlson, V., Asencio, M., & Miller, A. (2002). Parenting among Latino families in the U.S. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 4. Social conditions and applied parenting. Vol 2 (pp. 21–46). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Hoff-Ginsberg, E., & Tardif, T. (1995). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 2, pp. 161–188). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript Notation. In J. Heritage (Ed.), Structures of social interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Mehta, K. (1997). Respect redefined :focus group insights from Singapore. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 44, 205–219.
Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 73–94). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Saxena, V., & Babu, N. (2013). Expanding the domain of morality by going beyond moral reasoning: emerging trends in moral research. Psychological Studies. doi:10.1007/s12646-013-0201-2.
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The big three of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the big three explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.
Sinha, D. (2002). Culture and psychology: perspective of cross-cultural psychology. Psychology and Developing Societies, 14(1), 11–25.
Sung, K. (2001). Elder respect exploration of ideals and forms in East Asia. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 13–26.
Tuli, M., & Chaudhary, N. (2010). Elective interdependence: understanding individual agency and interpersonal relationships in Indian families. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 477–496.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saxena, V., Babu, N. Respecting Elders as A Moral Virtue: Terminal or Instrumental?. Psychol Stud 60, 146–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0305-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0305-y