Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Paclitaxel and Eribulin in Mouse Sciatic Nerve: A Microtubule-Based Rationale for the Differential Induction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurotoxicity Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microtubule targeting agents (MTAs) often lead to treatment limiting and life threatening side effects, including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The frequency of severe CIPN varies among different MTAs. Since the microtubule binding interactions and mechanisms of action also vary among MTAs, we hypothesized that these distinct mechanisms may underlie the variability in frequency of severe CIPN. Using a two-week, maximum tolerated dose model, we morphologically and biochemically analyzed sciatic nerves from mice treated with either paclitaxel or eribulin. These drugs differ in their manner of microtubule binding and mechanisms of action and reports indicate paclitaxel also induces a higher frequency of severe CIPN than does eribulin. Morphologically, paclitaxel increased the frequency of observed signs of axon degeneration more significantly than did eribulin. Alternatively, eribulin but not paclitaxel induced occasional myelin “halo” structures. Biochemically, paclitaxel, and eribulin both induced α-tubulin expression (~1.9- and ~2.5-fold, respectively) and tubulin acetylation, a marker for microtubule stability, (~5- and ~11.7-fold, respectively). Eribulin but not paclitaxel-induced EB1 expression ~2.2-fold while paclitaxel but not eribulin mildly suppressed EB3 expression. Both EB proteins are associated with microtubule growth. Eribulin’s combination of relatively mild deleterious morphological effects coupled with more potent biochemical changes promoting microtubule stability and growth in mice correlate with lower frequencies of severe CIPN in humans. We suggest that these eribulin-induced effects create a relatively stable microtubule network that compensates, in part, for the toxic anti-cancer effects of the drug, leading to fewer reported incidences of CIPN than for paclitaxel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Nichole LaPointe, Jennifer Smith, Mary Raven, Mohamed Farah and Kenneth Rose for valuable discussions. We also acknowledge the use of instruments in the NRI-MCDB Microscopy Facility at UCSB (supported in part by the Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health of the NIH under Award # S10OD010610). This work was supported by grants from EISAI (to SCF, MAJ, BSS, and LW) and the NIH/NCI (R01CA161056) to,BSS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart C. Feinstein.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benbow, S.J., Cook, B.M., Reifert, J. et al. Effects of Paclitaxel and Eribulin in Mouse Sciatic Nerve: A Microtubule-Based Rationale for the Differential Induction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Neurotox Res 29, 299–313 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-015-9580-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-015-9580-6

Keywords

Navigation