Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mediterranean forest mapping using hyper-spectral satellite imagery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mediterranean forests are characterized by spatiotemporal heterogeneity that is associated with Mediterranean climate, floristic biodiversity and topographic variability. Satellite remote sensing can be an effective tool for characterizing and monitoring forest vegetation distribution within these fragmented Mediterranean landscapes. The heterogeneity of Mediterranean vegetation, however, often exceeds the resolution typical of most satellite sensors. Hyper-spectral remote sensing technology demonstrates the capacity for accurate vegetation identification. The objective of this research is to determine to what extent forest types can be discriminated using different image analysis techniques and spectral band combinations of Hyperion satellite imagery. This research mapped forest types using a pixel-based Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), nearest neighbour and membership function classifiers of the object-oriented classification. Hyperion classification was done after reducing Hyperion data using nine selected band combinations. Results indicate that the selection of band combination while reducing the Hyperion dataset improves classification results for both the overall and the individual forest type accuracy, in particular for the selected optimum Hyperion band combination. One shortcoming is that the performance of the best selected band combination was superior in terms of both overall and individual forest type accuracy when applying the membership classifier of the object-oriented method compared to SAM and nearest neighbour classifiers. However, all techniques seemed to suffer from a number of problems, such as spectral similarity among forest types, overall low energy response of the Hyperion sensor, Hyperion medium spatial resolution and spatiotemporal and spectral heterogeneity of the Mediterranean ecosystem at multiple scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alados CL, Pueyo Y, Barrantes O, Escos J, Giner L, Robles AB (2004) Variations in landscape patterns and vegetation cover between 1957 and 1994 in a semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Landsc Ecol 19(5):543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashoori H, Fahimnejad H, Alimohammadi A, Soofbaf SR (2008) Evaluation of the usefulness of texture measures for crop type classification by Hyperion data. Int Arch Photogram Rem Sens Spatial Inform Sci 8(37):999–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajwa SG, Bajcsy P, Groves P, Tian LF (2004) Hyperspectral image data mining for band selection in agricultural applications. Trans ASAE (Am Soc Agric Eng) 47(3):895–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn GA, Steele CM (1999) Towards the remote sensing of matorral vegetation physiology: relationships between spectral reflectance, pigment, and biophysical characteristics of semiarid bushland canopies. Remote Sens Environ 70:278–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher Y, Poutier L, Achard V, Lenot X, Miesch C (2002) Validation and robustness of an atmospheric correction algorithm for hyper-spectral image. In: Algorithms and technologies for multispectral, hyper-spectral and ultraspectral imagery VIII, no. 4725–54. SPIE Aerosense, Orlando, pp 459–470

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd DS, Danson FM (2005) Satellite remote sensing of forest resources: three decades of research development. Prog Phys Geogr 29(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carleer A, Wolff E (2004) Exploitation of very high resolution satellite data for tree species identification. Photogramm Eng Rem S 70(1):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis Publications, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Datt B, McVicar TR, Van Niel TG, Jupp DLB, Pearlman JS (2003) Preprocessing EO-1 hyperion hyper-spectral data to support the application of agricultural indexes. IEEE T Geosci Remote 41(6):1246–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Backer S, Kempeneers P, Debruyn W, Scheunders P (2004) Classification of Dune vegetation from remotely sensed hyper-spectral images image analysis and recognition. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Definiens Imagine (2004) eCognition, object-oriented image analysis, User Guide 4. Definiens Imagine GmbH, München

    Google Scholar 

  • DigitalGlobe Inc (2005) QuickBird imagery products – product guide. DigitalGlobe, Inc. 1601 Dry Creek Drive, Ste 260, Longmont, Colorado 80503

  • Eckert Sm Kneubuhler M (2004) Application of Hyperion data to agricultural land classification and vegetation properties estimation in Switzerland. In: XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–23 July 2004

  • Elatawneh A, Manakos I, Kalaitzidis C, Shneider T (2009) Land cover classification and unmixing of hyperion image in area of Anopoli. In: 29th Annual EARSeL Symposium Proceedings, Crete, Greece, 15–18 June 2009

  • ENVI (2008) User’s guide, version 4.5. ITT Industries Inc, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS (1999) Imagine Field Guide, 5th edition revised and expanded. ERDAS®, Inc, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster JR, Townsend PA (2004) Linking hyperspectral imagery and forest inventories for forest assessment in the central Appalachians. Proceedings of the 14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Wooster, Ohio, 16–19 March 2004

  • Fridgen JJ, Hellmich R, Copenhaver K, Glaser JA (2006) Use of hyperspectral imagery to distinguish corn phenology. MAPPS/ASPRS 2006 Fall Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 6–10 November 2006

  • Gao Y, Mas JF (2008) A comparison of the performance of pixel-based and object based classification over images with various spatial resolutions. J Earth SCI 2(1):27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng XR, Zhao YC (2007) Principle of small target detection for hyper spectral imagery. Sci China Series D: Earth Sci 50(8):1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondard H, Romane F, Santa Regina I, Leonardi S (2006) Forest management and plant species diversity in chestnut stands of three Mediterranean areas. Biodivers Conserv 15(4):1129–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Pu R, Biging GS, Larrieu MR (2003) Estimation of forest leaf area index using vegetation indices derived from Hyperion hyper-spectral data. IEEE T Geosci Remote 41:1355–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough DG, Dyk A, Niemann KO, Pearlman JS, Chen H, Han T, Murdoch M, West C (2003) Processing HYPERION and ALI for forest classification. IEEE T Geosci Remote 41(6):1321–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govender M, Chetty K, Naiken V, Bulcock H (2008) A comparison of satellite hyper-spectral and multispectral remote sensing imagery for improved classification and mapping of vegetation. Water SA 34(2)

  • Hernandez-Stefanoni JL (2005) Relationships between landscape patterns and species richness of trees, shrubs and vines in a tropical forest. Plant Ecol 179(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobin B, Laberesque S, Grenier M, Falardeau G (2008) Object based classification as an alternative approach to the traditional pixel-based classification to identify potential habitat of the grasshopper sparrow. Environ Manage 41(1):20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaarna A, Toivanen P, Keranen P (2006) Compression and classification methods for hyper-spectral images. Pattern Recognit Image Anal 16(3):413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keramitsoglou I, Kontoes C, Sykioti O, Sifakis N, Xofis P (2008) Reliable, accurate and timely forest mapping for wildfire management using ASTER and Hyperion satellite imagery. Forest Ecol Manag 255:3556–3562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer RW, Lillesand T (1999) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahwinkler P, Rossmann J (2010) Tree species classification based on the analysis of hyperspectral remote sensing data. 30th EARSeL symposium: remote sensing for science, education and culture, Paris, France, 31 May to 3 June 2010

  • Kuenzer C, Bluemel A, Gebhardt S, Quoc TV, Dech S (2011) Remote sensing of mangrove ecosystems: a review. Remote Sens 3:878–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence RL, Wood SD, Sheley RL (2006) Mapping invasive plants using hyper-spectral imagery and Breiman Cutler classifications (randomForest). Remote Sens Environ 100(3):356–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legleiter CJ (2003) Spectrally driven classification of high spatial resolution hyper-spectral imagery; a tool for mapping in stream habitat. Environ Manage 32(3):399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew SC, Chang CW, Lim KH (2002) Hyper-spectral land cover classification of EO-1 Hyperion data by principal component analysis and pixel unmixing. IEEE T Geosci Remote 6:3111–3113

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbooba J, Khattak U, Rahman M (2011). Forest tree species classification using multispectral satellite imageries. First International Geomatics Symposium, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 10–13 May 2011

  • Mallinis G, Koutsias N, Tsakiri-Strati M, Karteris M (2008) Object based classification using Quickbird imagery for delineating forest vegetation polygons in a Mediterranean test site. Photogramm Eng Rem S 63(2):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur A, Bruce LM, Robles W, Madsen J (2006). Identification of pertinent regions in spectro-temporal maps for vegetative target detection. ASPRS 2006 Annual Conference Reno, Nevada, 1–5 May 2006

  • Matinfar HR, Sarmadian F, Alavi Panah SK, Heck RJ (2007) Comparisons of OO and pixel-based classification of landuse/land cover types based on Landsat 7. ETM+ spectral bands (case study: arid region of Iran). Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 2(4):448–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanase MA, Gitas IZ (2008) An examination of the effects of spatial resolution and image analysis technique on indirect fuel mapping. Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 1(4):220–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen AA (2001) Spectral mixture analysis; linear and semi parametric full and iterated partial unmixing in multi and hyper-spectral image data. J Math Imaging Vis 15(1–2):17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntouros KD, Gitas IZ, Silleos GN (2009) Mapping agricultural crops with EO-1 Hyperion data. First workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, 2009. WHISPERS ′09, in Grenoble, France, 26–28 August 2009

  • PCI Geomatics Enterprises Inc (2004) User’s Guide version 9.1. OrthoEngine, Geomatica

  • Quackenbush LJ, Ke Y, Kroll CN (2006) Investigating new advances in forest species classification: establishing a baseline. ASPRS 2006 Annual Conference, Reno, Nevada, 1–5 May 2006

  • Ray TW (1994) A FAQ on vegetation in remote sensing. http://www.yale.edu/ceo/Documentation/rsvegfaq.html Accessed 20 Oct 2010

  • Robila S (2005) An investigation of spectral metrics in hyper-spectral image pre-processing for classification. In: Geospatial goes global: from your neighborhood to the whole planet. ASPRS Annual Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, 7–11 March 2005

  • Rud R, Shoshany M, Alchanatis V, Cohern Y (2006) Application of spectral features ratios for improving classification in partially calibrated hyper-spectral imagery; a case study of separating Mediterranean vegetation species. J Real-Time Image Proc 1(2):143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shataee S, Kellenberger T, Darvishsefat AA (2004). Forest types classification using ETM+ data in the north of IRAN: comparison of object-oriented with pixel-based classification technique. XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–23 July 2004

  • Thenkabail PS, Enclona EA, Ashton MS, Van Der Meer B (2004) Accuracy assessments of hyperspectral waveband performance for vegetation analysis applications. Remote Sens Environ 91:354–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras O, Gil-Tena A, Saura S (2008) How does forest landscape structure explain tree species richness in a Mediterranean context. Biodivers Conserv 17(5):1227–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhala P, Tamminen P, Fritze H (2005) Relationship between basal soil respiration rate, tree stand and soil characteristics in boreal forests. Environ Monit Assess 101(1–3):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser LT, Baltsavias E, Ginzler C, Küchler M (2010) Semiautomatic classification of tree species by means of multitemporal airborne digital sensor data. ADS40 ISPRS TC VII Symposium—100 Years ISPRS, vol. XXXVIII, Part 7B, Vienna, Austria, 5–7 July 2010

  • Yuan J, Niu Z (2007) Classification using EO–1 Hyperion hyper spectral and ETM data. In: 4th International Conference of Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD, 24–27 August 2007, Haikou, Hainan, China, (3): 538–542

  • Zeng Y, Schaepman ME, Bingfang WUB, Clevers JGPW, Bregt AK (2007) Using linear spectral unmixing of high spatial resolution and hyper-spectral data for geometric–optical modeling. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Physical Measurements and Spectral Signatures in Remote Sensing (ISPMSRS'07), Davos, Switzerland, 12–14 March 2007

  • Zheng W, Zou C, Zhao L (2005) Generalized locally nearest-neighbor classifiers for object classification. Fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery. Lect Notes Comput Sc 3614(487):95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Troy A, Grove M (2008) Object based land cover classification and change analysis in the Baltimore Metropolitan Area using multi temporal high resolution remote sensed data. Sensors 8:1613–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank several anonymous reviewers for their suggestions which helped improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Management, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, Alsyllio Agrokepiou, P.O. Box 85, Chania, 73100, Crete, Greece

    Selma Etteieb & Chariton Kalaitzidis

  2. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), P.O. Box 950764, Amman, 11195, Jordan

    Mounir Louhaichi

  3. Laboratory of Forest Management and Remote Sensing, Faculty of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 248, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Ioannis Z. Gitas

Authors
  1. Selma Etteieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mounir Louhaichi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chariton Kalaitzidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ioannis Z. Gitas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selma Etteieb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etteieb, S., Louhaichi, M., Kalaitzidis, C. et al. Mediterranean forest mapping using hyper-spectral satellite imagery. Arab J Geosci 6, 5017–5032 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0748-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0748-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation