Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic digital mammography in Japan: issues to consider

  • Special Feature
  • Digital Mammography in Japan
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital mammography has been proposed as an alternative to screen-film mammography. Digital mammography has many technical advantages over film mammography, including image-enhancement capability, faster image acquisition, and better storage and transmission for archiving. However, its full potential can only be achieved through soft-copy reading. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography is still a relatively new technique, and has several issues which must still be resolved. It is necessary to optimize display formats and software as soon as possible to standardize soft-copy reading in digital mammography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uematsu T. Detection of masses calcifications by soft-copy reading: comparison of two postprocessing algorithms for full-field digital mammography. Jpn J Radiol. 2009;27:168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M, Barke L, Reddy D, Wolfman J, et al. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haygood TM, Wang J, Atkinson EN, Lane D, Stephens TW, Patel P, et al. Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:216–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Behlen FM. PACS issues. In: Pissano E, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM, editors. Digital mammography. 1st edn ed. Philadelphia: WW Lippincott; 2004. p. 62–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Uchida Y. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:714–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uematsu T, Kasami M. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:623–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamada T, Suzuki A, Uchiyama N, Ohuchi N, Takahashi S. Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5- megapixel LCD monitor. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2363–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstraw EJ, Castellano I, Ashley S, Allen S (2009) The effect of Premium View post-processing software on digital mammographic reporting. Br J Radiol. Epub ahead of print.

  9. Chen B, Wang W, Huang J, Zhao M, Cui G, Xu J, et al (2009) Comparison of tissue equalization, and premium view post-processing methods in full field digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayoshi Uematsu.

About this article

Cite this article

Uematsu, T. Diagnostic digital mammography in Japan: issues to consider. Breast Cancer 17, 180–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0196-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0196-7

Keywords

Navigation