Abstract
Digital mammography has been proposed as an alternative to screen-film mammography. Digital mammography has many technical advantages over film mammography, including image-enhancement capability, faster image acquisition, and better storage and transmission for archiving. However, its full potential can only be achieved through soft-copy reading. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography is still a relatively new technique, and has several issues which must still be resolved. It is necessary to optimize display formats and software as soon as possible to standardize soft-copy reading in digital mammography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uematsu T. Detection of masses calcifications by soft-copy reading: comparison of two postprocessing algorithms for full-field digital mammography. Jpn J Radiol. 2009;27:168–75.
Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M, Barke L, Reddy D, Wolfman J, et al. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:38–41.
Haygood TM, Wang J, Atkinson EN, Lane D, Stephens TW, Patel P, et al. Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:216–20.
Behlen FM. PACS issues. In: Pissano E, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM, editors. Digital mammography. 1st edn ed. Philadelphia: WW Lippincott; 2004. p. 62–6.
Uematsu T, Kasami M, Uchida Y. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:714–20.
Uematsu T, Kasami M. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:623–9.
Yamada T, Suzuki A, Uchiyama N, Ohuchi N, Takahashi S. Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5- megapixel LCD monitor. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2363–9.
Goldstraw EJ, Castellano I, Ashley S, Allen S (2009) The effect of Premium View post-processing software on digital mammographic reporting. Br J Radiol. Epub ahead of print.
Chen B, Wang W, Huang J, Zhao M, Cui G, Xu J, et al (2009) Comparison of tissue equalization, and premium view post-processing methods in full field digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Uematsu, T. Diagnostic digital mammography in Japan: issues to consider. Breast Cancer 17, 180–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0196-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0196-7