Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumers’ responses to cause related marketing: moderating influence of cause involvement and skepticism on attitude and purchase intention

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cause related marketing (CrM) has been increasingly becoming a mainstream of corporate marketing plans. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of CrM on attitudes and purchase intention and also the moderating role of cause involvement and skepticism (as covariates) on attitude-intention rationale. The study utilizes experimental design, using a convenience sample of 424 participants in Gujarat. Two structured questionnaire each for experimental group and control group were developed. The stimulus provided is in the form of brand name, product portfolio and CrM ad itself in the questionnaire for experimental group. Using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), study demonstrates that CrM improves the attitude towards brand, attitude towards an ad and purchase intention. Additionally, effect of CrM on attitude-purchase intention link is more explained if consumers are more involved with cause. Skepticism is not relevant to attitudes and purchase intention. This study helps companies to rethink on selecting. It also provides the insights to marketers about how cause involvement influences attitudes and intention and thus adds some valuable theory to the CrM literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, S. (2004). Cause related marketing: Who cares wins. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, T., & Burne, T. (1999). The impact of affect on memory of advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselmsson, J., & Johansson, U. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the positioning of grocery brands: an exploratory study of retailer and manufacturer brands at point of purchase. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(10), 835–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antil, J. H. (1984). Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1999). Attitude organization and the attitude-behavior relationship: a reply to Dillon and Kumar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 913–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D. & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deservce another? Academy of Markering Science, 28(2), 248–262.

  • Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belch, G.E., & Belch, M.A. (1998). Advertising and promotion – an integrated marketing communications perspective, International edition, Irwin McGraw Hill, USA.

  • Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Kozinets, R. V. (1999). Consumer persuasion through cause-related marketing. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., Ruiz-Mafé, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2011). Cause related marketing influence on consumer response: the moderating effect of cause brand fit. Journal of Marketing Communications, iFirst. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2010.521358.

  • Bridges, E., Briesch, R. A., & Yim, C. K. (2006). Effects of prior brand usage and promotion on consumer promotional response. Journal of Retailing, 82(4), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D. V. D., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Pauwels, P. (2006). The effect of strategic and tactical cause-related marketing on consumers’ brand loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, A., Jogi, A., & Garry, T. (2003). Tickled pink: the personal meaning of cause related marketing for customers. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(5/6), 583–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brønn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, I., & Dolli, N. (2001). Cause related marketing in New Zealand. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 6(2), 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C., & Cheng, Z. (2015). Tugging on heartstrings: shopping orientation, mindset, and consumer responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 337–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-T., & Liu, H.-W. (2012). Goodwill hunting? Influences of product-cause fit, product type, and donation level in cause-related marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(6), 634–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheron, E., Kohlbacher, F., & Kusuma, K. (2012). The effects of brand-cause fit and campaign duration on consumer perception of cause-related marketing in Japan. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, Inc. (2006). Cone millennial cause study 2006. Available at: http://www.coneinc.com/content1090. Accessed on 15 Feb 2011.

  • Crommentuijn, M. (2010). Cause-related marketing: Identifying consumer attitude and consumer purchase intention drivers in a general and cross-cultural context. Master Thesis Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, Venlo.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, D.W., & Lavack, A.M. (1995). Cause-related marketing: impact of size of corporate donation and size of cause related promotion on consumer perceptions and participation. American Marketing Association, Winter Proceedings, 476–481.

  • Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer perception of corporate donations: effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M. E. (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: the role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P., Mohr, L., & Webb, D. (1996). Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: Do attributions make a difference? Working paper, Department of Marketing, Georgia State University.

  • Ferle, C., Kuber, G., & Edwards, S. M. (2013). Factors impacting responses to cause-related marketing in India and the United. Journal of Business Research, 66, 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, J. A. G., Niedrich, R. W., & Grau, S. L. (2010). Cause related marketing: the effect of purchase Quantity and Firm Donation on Consumer inferences and Participation Intention. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries, A. J., Gedenk, K. & Völckner, F. (2009). Success drivers of cause related marketing. In Proceedings of the European MArketing Academy Conference EMAC 2009. Nantes: Frankreich.

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galan-Ladero, M., Galera-Casquet, C., & Wymer, W. (2013). Attitudes towards cause-related marketing: determinants of satisfaction and loyalty. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(3), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): the influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). The company-cause customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajjat, M. M. (2003). Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: the moderating role of cause involvement and donation size. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad, H., et al. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of consumers’ attitudinal dispositions toward cause-related marketing in Egypt. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 5(3), 414–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., Du, L., & Li, J. (2008). Cause’s attributes influencing consumer’s purchasing intention: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P. (1987). Management (2nd ed.). Taipei: Tung-Hua Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyllegard, K. H., Yan, R. N., Ogle, J. P., & Attmann, J. (2011). The influence of gender, social cause, charitable support, and message appeal on Gen Y’s responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1–2), 100–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. J., Kim, J., & Han, W. H. (2005). The effects of cause-related marketing on company and brand attitudes. Seoul Journal of Business, 11(2), 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, P., & Sujan, M. (1999). Retrospection versus anticipation: the role of the ad under retrospective and anticipatory self referencing. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B. A. (1996). Cause-related marketing: does the cause make a difference in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions toward the product? Working paper, Florida State University, Department of Marketing.

  • Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2005). Cause-brand alliances: does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lii, Y. S. & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: when the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 69–81.

  • Liu, G. (2013). Impacts of instrumental versus relational centered logic on cause-related marketing decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. In L. F. Alwitt & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research, and application (pp. 45–63). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, D. & Joan, M. L. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361–367.

  • Malhotra, N. K. (2007). Marketing research. An applied orientation (5th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, A., & Purvis, S. C. (1995). When attitude towards advertising in general influence advertising success. In Madden, C.S. (ed). Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising conference Annual conference of the American Academy of Advertising.

  • Meyer, H. (1999). When the cause is just- cover story. Journal of Business Strategy, 20, 27–31.

  • Mohr, L. A., Eroglu, D., & Ellen, S. P. (1998). The development and testing of a measure of skepticism toward environment claims in marketers’ communications. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 30–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, B., & Kwon, W. (2013). A model of antecedents of consumers’ post brand attitude upon exposure to a cause–brand alliance. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility initiatives: examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermiller, C., Spangenberg, E., & Maclachlan, D. (2005). Ad skepticism: the consequences of disbelief. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P & G (2015). Official website. <Accessed from http://www.pg.com/en_IN/ ><Accessed on September 2, 2015; 10.05 pm>

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issues involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (October), 1915–1926.

  • Petty, R. E., John, T. C., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picton, D., & Broderick, A. (2001). Integrated marketing communications. Essex: Pearson Edition Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putrevu, S. & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and non compartive advertising: attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23, 77–90.

  • Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91(3), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.K., Stutts, M.A., & Patterson, L.T. (1990–1991). Tactical considerations for the effectiveness of cause related marketing. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 7(2), 58–65.

  • Ross, J. K., Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: current problems and future directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 216–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2004). Consumer behaviour. Upper Saddle River: Pearson. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Kristensen, L., & Villasenor, E. (2009). Overcoming skepticism towards cause related claims: the case of Norway. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., & Alcorn, D. S. (1991). Cause marketing: a new direction in the marketing of corporate responsibility. Journal of Services Marketing, 5(4), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, N. & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53–66.

  • Szykman, R. L., Bloom, N. P., & Levy, S. A. (1997). A proposed model of the use of package claims and labels. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 16, 228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, C. S., & Rifon, N. J. (2006). Consumer perceptions of compatibility in CRM messages. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(3), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan, R., & Aggarwal P. (2005). Using commitments to drive consistency: enhancing the effectiveness of cause-related marketing communications. Lead article in Journal of Marketing Communications, 11 (December), 231–246.

  • Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., Reast, J., & van Popering, N. (2012). To do well by doing good: improving corporate image through cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause related marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: from skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17(2), 226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westberg, K., & Pope, N. (2005). An examination of cause-related marketing in the context of brand attitude, Purchase Intention, Perceived Fit and Personal Values. conference proceeding AZMAC 2005 Conference: Corporate Responsibility.

  • Yang, D. J., & Li, H. J. (2007). A study of consumers’ attitudes toward the methods employed by an enterprise for charitable acts: cause-related marketing vs sponsorship. Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Science, 2(4), 14–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavas, U., Woodbridge, A., & Ashill, N. (2007). Attitude of Tweeners to cause-related marketing. Scientific Journal of Administrative Development, 5, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousafzai, S., Foxall, G., & Pallister, J. (2010). Explaining internet banking behaviour: theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behaviour or technology acceptance model? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(5), 1172–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. V. M. Patel Institute of Management, Ganpat University, Gujarat, India

    Jayesh D. Patel & Yupal S. Shukla

  2. V. M. Patel College of Management Studies, Ganpat University, Gujarat, India

    Dharmesh D. Gadhavi

Authors
  1. Jayesh D. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dharmesh D. Gadhavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yupal S. Shukla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayesh D. Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, J.D., Gadhavi, D.D. & Shukla, Y.S. Consumers’ responses to cause related marketing: moderating influence of cause involvement and skepticism on attitude and purchase intention. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 14, 1–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-016-0151-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-016-0151-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation