Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of dynamic behaviors of bedrock foundation subjected to seismic loads based on FEM and DEM simulations

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic behavior of bedrock foundation remains as one of the most fundamental and important problems concerning the stability and safety of nuclear power plants. The dynamic FEM (Finite Element Method) is commonly utilized in analyzing the seismic responses of bedrock; while in recent decades, the DEM (Distinct Element Method) has attracted more and more attentions, which has a better capability of simulating the sliding and separation of discontinuities in dynamic simulations. In this study, the FEM and DEM were adopted to investigate the seismic behavior of the bedrock of a nuclear power plant located in Japan, and the differences between the two methods in dynamic simulations were illuminated. Simulation results using FEM and DEM models without discontinuities agree well with each other, exhibiting an amplification effect of intact bedrock on the seismic wave propagation. Numerical simulation results obtained from the models containing faults give similar responses of bedrock to the input seismic waves; however, the FEM model underestimates the weakening effect of discontinuities on the propagation of seismic waves due to that it cannot represent well the large deformational behavior of discontinuities. When large deformation happens due to large seismic loads, the DEM can be regarded as a better method in seismic response evaluations of bedrock with discontinuities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cai, J. G. and Zhao, J. (2000). “Effects of multiple parallel fractures on apparent attenuation of stress waves in rock masses.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 661–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Lou, M., and Tao, S. (2006). “Discussions on two-dimensional finite element analysis of seismic response.” Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Earthquake Administration (1998). GB 50267-97 Code for seismic design of nuclear power plants, China Planning Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouteau, D., Broc, D., Devésa, G., Guyonvarh, V., and Massin, P. (2012). “Calculation methods of Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction (3SI) for embedded buildings: Application to NUPEC tests.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss, I. M., Seed, H. B., and Serff, N. (1974). “Seismic response by variable damping finite elements.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (2003). NS-G-1.6 Safety guide of seismic design and qualification for nuclear power plant, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (2011). Energy, electricity and nuclear power estimates for the period up to 2050, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2004). Universal distinct element code: Theory and background, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Society of Civil Engineers (1989). Dynamic analysis and seismic design, Japan Gihodo Press, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Chen, J., and Li, J. (2010). “Seismic response of underground utility tunnels: shaking table testing and FEM analysis.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Li, B., and Yamashita, Y. (2009). “Simulation of cracking near a large underground cavern in a discontinuous rock mass using the expanded distinct element method.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Xiao, J., Tanabashi, Y., and Mizokami, T. (2004). “Development of an automated servo-controlled direct shear apparatus applying a constant normal stiffness condition.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing, L. and Hudson, J. A. (2002). “Numerical methods in rock mechanics.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamiyama, M. and Yanagisawa, E. (1986). “A statistical model for estimating response spectra of strong earthquake ground motions with emphasis on local soil condition.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita, S. (1984). “Spectral Characteristics of bedrock motion in the Tokyo metropolitan area.” Proceeding of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, No. 344/I-1, pp. 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Jiang, Y., Tanabashi, Y., and Yamashita, Y. (2010). “Behavior of large scale underground cavern located in jointed rock masses evaluated by using Distinct Element Method.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 609–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü, T., Yang, Q., Geng, X., Yang, L., Yang, L., and Li, H. (2010). “Study of influence of rock hardness on characteristic of seismic response of bedrock-foundation of nuclear power plants.” Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1319–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Standards Committee of Japan (2008a). JEAC 4601-2008 Technical regulations for seismic design of nuclear power plant, Japan Electric Association Press, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Standards Committee of Japan (2008b). JEAG 4601-2008 Technical guide for seismic design of nuclear power plant, Japan Electric Association Press, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, Z., Souli, M., and Fahjan, Y. M. (2010). “Application of nonlinear fluid_structure interaction methods to seismic analysis of anchored and unanchored tanks.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyrak-Nolte, L. J., Myer, L. R., and Cook, N. G. W. (1990). “Transmission of seismic waves across single natural fractures.” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 95, No. B6, pp. 8617–8638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, C. and Qian, Q. (2000). “Overview of seismic research for nuclear power plant.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H. B. (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, EERC University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberg, M. (1980). “Elastic wave behaviour across linear slip interfaces.” Journal of Acoustics Society of America, Vol. 68, No. 5, pp. 1516–1521.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H. B., Wong, R. T., Idriss, I. M., and Tokimatsu, K. (1986). “Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 11, pp. 1016–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shou, P., Liu, C., and Zhu, J. (1982). Application of seismic waves in projects, Earthquake Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Structure and Planning Institute of Japan (2005a). User manual of the seismic response analysis program for stratified soil layers: k-SHAKE, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Structure and Planning Institute of Japan (2005b). User manual of the two-dimensional dynamic interaction analysis program for ground and structure: SuperFLUSH/2D, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushiyama, N., Taniyama, H., and Tsunoda, F. (2009). “Concussional movement of the Rokko fault block in Kansai and its dynamic response analysis for seismic isolation block system.” Earth Science, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, H., Zhao, F., and Rong, M. (2009). “Nonlinear seismic response of horizontal layered site due to inclined wave.” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Pekau, O. A., Jin, F., and Wang, G. (1997). “Application of distinct element method in dynamic analysis of high rock slopes and blocky structure.” Soil Dynamics and Seismic Engineering, Vol. 116, pp. 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C., Zhang, C., Wang, G., and Zhang, G. (1988). “Effects of the characteristics of soil layers on field seismic response by using infinite element.” Hydro-science and Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. B., Zhao, J., Cai, J. G., and Hefny, A. M. (2008). “UDEC modeling on wave propagation across fractured rock masses.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. B., Zhao, J., Hefny, A. M., and Cai, J. G. (2006). “Normal transmission of S-wave across parallel fractures with Coulomb slip behavior.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 132, No. 6, pp. 651–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, L., Jiang, Y., Li, B. et al. Estimation of dynamic behaviors of bedrock foundation subjected to seismic loads based on FEM and DEM simulations. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 342–350 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1541-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1541-0

Keywords

Navigation