Abstract
Seismic behavior of bedrock foundation remains as one of the most fundamental and important problems concerning the stability and safety of nuclear power plants. The dynamic FEM (Finite Element Method) is commonly utilized in analyzing the seismic responses of bedrock; while in recent decades, the DEM (Distinct Element Method) has attracted more and more attentions, which has a better capability of simulating the sliding and separation of discontinuities in dynamic simulations. In this study, the FEM and DEM were adopted to investigate the seismic behavior of the bedrock of a nuclear power plant located in Japan, and the differences between the two methods in dynamic simulations were illuminated. Simulation results using FEM and DEM models without discontinuities agree well with each other, exhibiting an amplification effect of intact bedrock on the seismic wave propagation. Numerical simulation results obtained from the models containing faults give similar responses of bedrock to the input seismic waves; however, the FEM model underestimates the weakening effect of discontinuities on the propagation of seismic waves due to that it cannot represent well the large deformational behavior of discontinuities. When large deformation happens due to large seismic loads, the DEM can be regarded as a better method in seismic response evaluations of bedrock with discontinuities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cai, J. G. and Zhao, J. (2000). “Effects of multiple parallel fractures on apparent attenuation of stress waves in rock masses.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 661–682.
Chen, C., Lou, M., and Tao, S. (2006). “Discussions on two-dimensional finite element analysis of seismic response.” Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 292–301.
China Earthquake Administration (1998). GB 50267-97 Code for seismic design of nuclear power plants, China Planning Press, Beijing, China.
Clouteau, D., Broc, D., Devésa, G., Guyonvarh, V., and Massin, P. (2012). “Calculation methods of Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction (3SI) for embedded buildings: Application to NUPEC tests.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 129–142.
Idriss, I. M., Seed, H. B., and Serff, N. (1974). “Seismic response by variable damping finite elements.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 1–13.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2003). NS-G-1.6 Safety guide of seismic design and qualification for nuclear power plant, Vienna, Austria.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2011). Energy, electricity and nuclear power estimates for the period up to 2050, Vienna, Austria.
Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2004). Universal distinct element code: Theory and background, Minnesota, USA.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers (1989). Dynamic analysis and seismic design, Japan Gihodo Press, Tokyo, Japan.
Jiang, L., Chen, J., and Li, J. (2010). “Seismic response of underground utility tunnels: shaking table testing and FEM analysis.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 555–567.
Jiang, Y., Li, B., and Yamashita, Y. (2009). “Simulation of cracking near a large underground cavern in a discontinuous rock mass using the expanded distinct element method.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 97–106.
Jiang, Y., Xiao, J., Tanabashi, Y., and Mizokami, T. (2004). “Development of an automated servo-controlled direct shear apparatus applying a constant normal stiffness condition.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 275–286.
Jing, L. and Hudson, J. A. (2002). “Numerical methods in rock mechanics.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 409–427.
Kamiyama, M. and Yanagisawa, E. (1986). “A statistical model for estimating response spectra of strong earthquake ground motions with emphasis on local soil condition.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 16–32.
Kinoshita, S. (1984). “Spectral Characteristics of bedrock motion in the Tokyo metropolitan area.” Proceeding of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, No. 344/I-1, pp. 51–56.
Li, B., Jiang, Y., Tanabashi, Y., and Yamashita, Y. (2010). “Behavior of large scale underground cavern located in jointed rock masses evaluated by using Distinct Element Method.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 609–621.
Lü, T., Yang, Q., Geng, X., Yang, L., Yang, L., and Li, H. (2010). “Study of influence of rock hardness on characteristic of seismic response of bedrock-foundation of nuclear power plants.” Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1319–1325.
Nuclear Standards Committee of Japan (2008a). JEAC 4601-2008 Technical regulations for seismic design of nuclear power plant, Japan Electric Association Press, Tokyo, Japan.
Nuclear Standards Committee of Japan (2008b). JEAG 4601-2008 Technical guide for seismic design of nuclear power plant, Japan Electric Association Press, Tokyo, Japan.
Ozdemir, Z., Souli, M., and Fahjan, Y. M. (2010). “Application of nonlinear fluid_structure interaction methods to seismic analysis of anchored and unanchored tanks.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 409–423.
Pyrak-Nolte, L. J., Myer, L. R., and Cook, N. G. W. (1990). “Transmission of seismic waves across single natural fractures.” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 95, No. B6, pp. 8617–8638.
Qi, C. and Qian, Q. (2000). “Overview of seismic research for nuclear power plant.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 76–86.
Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H. B. (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, EERC University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Schoenberg, M. (1980). “Elastic wave behaviour across linear slip interfaces.” Journal of Acoustics Society of America, Vol. 68, No. 5, pp. 1516–1521.
Seed, H. B., Wong, R. T., Idriss, I. M., and Tokimatsu, K. (1986). “Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 11, pp. 1016–1032.
Shou, P., Liu, C., and Zhu, J. (1982). Application of seismic waves in projects, Earthquake Press, Beijing, China.
Structure and Planning Institute of Japan (2005a). User manual of the seismic response analysis program for stratified soil layers: k-SHAKE, Tokyo, Japan.
Structure and Planning Institute of Japan (2005b). User manual of the two-dimensional dynamic interaction analysis program for ground and structure: SuperFLUSH/2D, Tokyo, Japan.
Ushiyama, N., Taniyama, H., and Tsunoda, F. (2009). “Concussional movement of the Rokko fault block in Kansai and its dynamic response analysis for seismic isolation block system.” Earth Science, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 343–354.
You, H., Zhao, F., and Rong, M. (2009). “Nonlinear seismic response of horizontal layered site due to inclined wave.” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 234–240.
Zhang, C., Pekau, O. A., Jin, F., and Wang, G. (1997). “Application of distinct element method in dynamic analysis of high rock slopes and blocky structure.” Soil Dynamics and Seismic Engineering, Vol. 116, pp. 385–394.
Zhao, C., Zhang, C., Wang, G., and Zhang, G. (1988). “Effects of the characteristics of soil layers on field seismic response by using infinite element.” Hydro-science and Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 31–45.
Zhao, X. B., Zhao, J., Cai, J. G., and Hefny, A. M. (2008). “UDEC modeling on wave propagation across fractured rock masses.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 97–104.
Zhao, X. B., Zhao, J., Hefny, A. M., and Cai, J. G. (2006). “Normal transmission of S-wave across parallel fractures with Coulomb slip behavior.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 132, No. 6, pp. 651–650.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, L., Jiang, Y., Li, B. et al. Estimation of dynamic behaviors of bedrock foundation subjected to seismic loads based on FEM and DEM simulations. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 342–350 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1541-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1541-0