Skip to main content
Log in

Eusociality: From the First Foragers to the First States

Introduction to the Special Issue

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People have always been social. Ethnographic evidence suggests that transfers of food and labor are common among contemporary hunter-gatherers, and they probably were common in Paleolithic groups. Archaeological evidence suggests that cooperative breeding went up as we settled down: as territory defenders became more successful breeders, their helpers’ fertility would have been delayed or depressed. And written evidence from the Neolithic suggests that the first civilizations were often eusocial; emperors fathered hundreds of children, who were provided for and protected by workers in sterile castes. Papers in this issue of Human Nature look at helpers and workers across the eusociality continuum—from hardworking grandmothers and grandfathers, to celibate sisters and brothers, to castrated civil servants—from the first foragers to the first states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, H. P. (2000). The grandmother hypothesis and primate life histories. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 113, 435–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, C., et al. (2013). Barium distributions in teeth reveal early-life dietary transitions in primates. Nature, 498, 216–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barham, L., & Mitchell, P. (2008). The first Africans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. (2002). The upper Paleolithic revolution. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 363–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, S. (1966). Nests and social behavior of halictine bees of India. Indian Journal of Entomology, 28, 375–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence. Human Behavior and Evolution, 33, 309–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. (2013). Darwin’s question: How can sterility evolve? In K. Summers & B. J. Crespi (Eds.), Human social evolution: The foundational works of Richard Alexander (pp. 365–374). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. (2014). Eusociality in history. Human Nature, 25(1), in press. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9186-8.

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M., et al. (2009). Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science, 326, 682–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. (1987). Helping and communal breeding in birds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1936). Man makes himself. London: Watts & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, B. (2005). Social sophistry: logos and mythos in the forms of cooperation. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 42, 569–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, B. (2014). The insectan apes. Human Nature, 25(1), in press. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9185-9.

  • Emlen, S. T. (1982). The evolution of helping, I, II: an ecological constraints model. American Naturalist, 119, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T. (1995). An evolutionary theory of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 8092–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, K., & Ratneiks, F. (2005). A new eusocial vertebrate? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 363–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Longevity among hunter-gatherers: a cross-cultural examination. Population and Development Review, 33, 321–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, B. (1988). The first historians: The Hebrew Bible and history. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K. (2014). Primate sociality to human cooperation: why us and not them? Human Nature, 25(1), in press. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9184-x.

  • Hawkes, K., et al. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 1336–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., et al. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (2009). Superorganism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, T., Xu, J.-J., Mace, R. (2014). Intergenerational and sibling conflict under patrilocality: a model of reproductive skew applied to kinship. Human Nature, 25(1), in press. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9188-6.

  • Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J. B., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., Gurven, M., Winking, J., Hooper, P. L., & Stieglitz, J. (2010). Learning, menopause, and the human adaptive complex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1204, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. (1988). Hunter-gatherer economic complexity and “population pressure”: a cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 7, 373–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, I. (2006). Constraints on the development of enduring inequalities in Late Holocene Australia. Current Anthropology, 47, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. (2013). The foraging spectrum (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. S., Coxworth, J. E., & Hawkes, K. (2012). Increased longevity evolves from grandmothering. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 4880–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. L. (2011). The evolution of human parental care and recruitment of juvenile help. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 533–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. L. (2014). Why what juveniles do matters in the evolution of cooperative breeding. Human Nature, 25(1), in press. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9189-5.

  • Langergraber, K. E., et al. (2012). Generation times in wild chimpanzees and gorillas suggest earlier divergence times in great ape and human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 15716–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1979). The !Kung San. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. C. (2012). Growth and investment in hominin life history evolution: patterns, processes, and outcomes. International Journal of Primatology, 33, 1309–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 453–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, C., Boyle, K., Bar-Yosef, O., & Stringer, C. (2007). Rethinking the human revolution. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1996). How writing came about. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, P. W., Lacey, E., Reeve, K., & Keller, L. (1995). The eusociality continuum. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skutch, A. F. (1935). Helpers at the nest. Auk, 52, 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M. (2013). Teeth and human life history evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, in press.

  • Strassmann, B., & Garrard, W. (2011). Alternatives to the grandmother hypothesis. Human Nature, 22, 201–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. E., et al. (2007). Aging and fertility patterns in wild chimpanzees provide insights into the evolution of menopause. Current Biology, 17, 2150–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar, S. D., Puleston, C. O., & Gurven, M. D. (2007). Why men matter: mating patterns drive evolution of human lifespan. PLoS One, 2(8), e785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turke, P. W. (1988). Helpers at the nest: Childcare networks on Ifaluk. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 173–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp, S. (1983). A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Animal Behaviour, 31, 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Karen Kramer for intelligent comments, and to all contributors for important papers on an important subject. I am forever indebted to Jane Lancaster for making this special issue possible, and to Sarah Blaffer Hrdy for encouragement throughout.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Betzig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betzig, L. Eusociality: From the First Foragers to the First States. Hum Nat 25, 1–5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9187-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9187-7

Keywords

Navigation