Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bioprosthetic valves — An initial experience

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the study was to assess the functional status, performance and complications of bioprosthetic valves implanted in forty five consecutive patients at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi between January 2000 and September 2001.

Method. The preoperative, operative and postoperative data were collected from case records and at follow up.

Results. Hospital Mortality was 6.6% (3 out of 45) and incidence of all complications was 4.9%. There was one valve related death (2.4%). There was no structural failure or anticoagulant related haemorrhage. The incidence of thromboembolism and infective endocarditis were 2.4%. Postoperative gradients were low.

Conclusion. The early clinical performance and in vivo hemodynamics of Carpentier Edwards (Porcine) bioprosthesis in our experience is satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holper K, Wottke M, Lewe T et al. Bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the elderly: benefits and risks. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 443–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Logeais Y, Langanay T, Corbinean H, Roussin R, Rioux C, Leguerrier A. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: Bioposthesis or mechanical valve? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S77–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antunes MI. Valve replacement in elderly. J thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98: 485–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sidhu P, O’Kane H, Ali N, Gladstone DJ, Sarsam MAI, MacGowan SW et al. Mechanical or Bioprosthetic valves in the elderly: A 20 year comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: S57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Milano A, Guglielmi C, De Carlo M, Gregorio OD, Borzoni G, Bortolotti U et al. Valve-related complications in elderly patients with biological and mechanical aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S82–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA et al. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 1301–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorothy JT, Jamieson WRE, Dumesnil JG, Busse EFG, Peniston CM et al Medtronic Mosaic Porcine bioprosthesis—Satisfactory early clinical performance. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S122–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fradet GJ, Bleese N, Burgess J, Cartier PC. Mosaic valve international clinical trial: early performance results. Ann Thorac. Surg 2001; 71: S 273–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomson DJ, Jamieson WRE, Dumesnil JG, Burgess JJ, Peniston CM et al. Medtronic Mosaic procine bioprosthesis: Midterm investigational trial results. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 269–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, S., Kumar, A.S. & Kumar, A.S. Bioprosthetic valves — An initial experience. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 18, 115–117 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-002-0018-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-002-0018-4

Key words

Navigation