Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Revisiting energy efficiency fundamentals

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy efficiency is a central target for energy policy and a keystone to mitigate climate change and to achieve a sustainable development. Although great efforts have been carried out during the last four decades to investigate the issue, focusing into measuring energy efficiency, understanding its trends and impacts on energy consumption and to design effective energy efficiency policies, many energy efficiency-related concepts, some methodological problems for the construction of energy efficiency indicators (EEI) and even some of the energy efficiency potential gains are often ignored or misunderstood, causing no little confusion and controversy not only for laymen but even for specialists. This paper aims to revisit, analyse and discuss some efficiency fundamental topics that could improve understanding and critical judgement of efficiency stakeholders and that could help in avoiding unfounded judgements and misleading statements. Firstly, we address the problem of measuring energy efficiency both in qualitative and quantitative terms. Secondly, main methodological problems standing in the way of the construction of EEI are discussed, and a sequence of actions is proposed to tackle them in an ordered fashion. Finally, two key topics are discussed in detail: the links between energy efficiency and energy savings, and the border between energy efficiency improvement and renewable sources promotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The amount of heat that could be transferred in a heat exchanger of infinite area.

  2. Passenger-distance is determined by multiplying the number of passengers by the distance a vehicle travels, typically measured as passenger-kilometre (pkm).

  3. It is worth mentioning the nuances introduced by some Romance languages such as Spanish, French and Italian, using the words ‘rendimiento’, ‘rendement’ and ‘rendimento’, respectively, to refer to non-dimensional thermodynamic efficiency indicators in particular.

  4. Some sources improperly refer to this type of indicators simply as energy intensities.

  5. Note that in this classification, building sector is split into residential (household) and commercial (non-residential). Note also that the IEA usually splits transportation into travel and freight and includes commercial buildings within the services sector.

  6. ASHRAE 55 (ASHRAE Standard 55 2010) defines thermal comfort as the state of mind which expresses satisfaction with the surrounding environment.

  7. See section 2.2 Pérez-Lombard et al. (2012) for details.

References

  • ADEME (2009) Energy Efficiency Trends and Policies in the EU 27. Results of the ODYSSEE-MURE project. October 2009 ADEME Editions, Paris.

  • Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (2002). Performance measurement in facilities management and its relationships with management theory and motivation. Facilities, 20(10), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE Standard 55 (2010). Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. Atlanta, GA.

  • Asia Pacific Energy Research Center. (2000). Energy efficiency indicators: a study of energy efficiency indicators for industry in APEC economies. Tokyo: APRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (2001). Energy efficiency indicators—a study of energy efficiency indicators in APEC economies. Tokyo.

  • Bertoldi, P. et al. (2009). Feed in tariff for energy saving: thinking of the design. ECEEE 2009 Summer Study.

  • Bertoldi, P. et al. (2010). Rewarding energy savings rather than energy efficiency. 2010 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.

  • Boonekamp, P. G. M. (2006). Evaluation of methods used to determine realized energy savings. Energy Policy, 34, 3977–3992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonekamp, P. G. M. (2011). How much will the energy service directive contribute to the 20 % EU energy savings goal? Energy Efficiency, 4, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonekamp, P.G.M., Thomas, S. (2009). Harmonised calculation of energy savings for the EU Directive on energy end-use efficiency and energy services: development and assessment of a combined bottom-up and top-down approach. EMEEES project Work package 6.1.

  • Bosseboeuf, D., Lapillonne, B., Eichhammer, W. (2005). Measuring energy efficiency progress in the EU: the energy efficiency index ODEX. ECEEE 2005 Summer Study—What works & Who delivers?

  • Brännlund, R., et al. (2007). Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Economics, 29, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Energy Commission (2008). Building energy efficiency standards for residential and non-residential buildings. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6.

  • Cleland, A. C., et al. (1981). Application of linear regression to analysis of data from factory energy surveys. Journal of Food Technology, 16, 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, J. (1985). Effectiveness and efficiency in higher education. Higher Education, 14(3), 235–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. M., & Allwood, J. M. (2010). The efficient use of energy: tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service. Energy Policy, 38(1), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings.

  • Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC.

  • Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.

  • Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast).

  • Efficiency Valuation Organisation (2010). International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP). Concepts and options for determining energy and water savings, volume 1.

  • EN 13779 (2007), Ventilation for non-residential buildings—performance requirements for ventilation and room-conditioning systems.

  • EN 15251 (2007), Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics.

  • Energy Information Administration (1995). Measuring energy efficiency in the United States' economy: a beginning. U.S. Department of Energy.

  • Energy Information Administration (2009). International energy outlook 2009. U.S. Department of Energy

  • European Commission (2005). Doing more with less: green paper on energy efficiency. EU Directorate-General for Energy and Transport. European Communities.

  • Greening, L. A., et al. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy, 28, 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, H. (2000). Is energy efficiency environmentally friendly? Energy and Environment, 11(3), 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, H. (2006). Energy efficiency—a critical review. Energy, 31, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S., & Englund, G. (2009). Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect: evidence from USA and six European countries 1960–2002. Ecological Economics, 68, 879–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2009). Implementing energy efficiency policies. Are IEA member countries on track? OECD/EIA, Paris.

  • International Energy Agency. (1997a). The link between energy and human activity. Paris: OECD/IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency. (1997b). Indicators of energy use and efficiency. Understanding the link between energy and human activity. Paris: OECD/IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency. (2004). Oil crisis & climate challenges—30 years of energy use in IEA countries. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency. (2008). Worldwide trends in energy use and efficiency. Key insights from IEA indicator analysis. Paris: OECD/IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 13600 (1997), Technical energy systems—basic concepts.

  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2011). National Energy Efficiency Evaluation, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) standard: scoping study of issues and implementation requirements.

  • Lebot, B., Bertoldi, P., Harrington, P. (2004) Consumption versus efficiency: have we designed the right policies and programmes? In Proceedings of the ACEEE 2004 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Washington: American Council for Energy Efficient Economy

  • Moezzi, M. (1998). The predicament of efficiency. In Proceedings of the ACEEE 1998 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Washington: American Council for Energy Efficient Economy.

  • Nanduri, M., et al. (2002). Aggregating physical intensity indicators: results of applying the composite indicator approach to the Canadian industrial sector. Energy Policy, 30, 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. G. (1993). Approaches to energy quality in energy analysis. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 5(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. G. (1996). What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy, 24(5), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Lombard, L., et al. (2009). A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes. Energy and Buildings, 41, 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Lombard, L., et al. (2011). The map of energy flow in HVAC systems. Applied Energy, 88, 5020–5031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Lombard, L., et al. (2012). Constructing HVAC energy efficiency indicators. Energy and Buildings, 47, 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phylipsen, G.J.M. (2010). Energy efficiency indicators. Best practice and potential use in developing country policy making. Commissioned by the World Bank.

  • Phylipsen, G. J. M., Blok, K., & Worrell, E. (2002). Benchmarking the energy efficiency of Dutch industry: an assessment of the expected effect on energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 30, 663–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phylipsen, G.J.M., et al. (1998). Handbook on international comparisons of energy efficiency in the manufacturing industry. Department of Science, Technology and Society. Utrecht University.

  • Rue du Can, S., et al. (2010). Energy efficiency indicators methodology booklet. Berkeley: LBNL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L., Unander, F., Murtishaw, S., & Ting, M. (2001). Indicators of energy use and carbon emissions: explaining the energy economy link. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 26, 49–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L., et al. (1992). Energy efficiency and human activity: past trends, future prospects. Cambridge University Press. C. Hope and J. Skea, editors.

  • Schnapp, R. (2012). Energy statistics for energy efficiency indicators. Joint Rosstat—IEA Energy Statistics Workshop Moscow, February 2012.

  • Sorrel, S. (2009). Jevons' paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 37, 1456–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unander, F. (2005). Energy indicators and sustainable development: the International Energy Agency approach. Natural Resources Forum, 29, 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Energy Council. (2008). Energy efficiency policies around the world: review and evaluation. London: World Energy Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grupo de Termotecnia, Escuela Superior de Ingenieros, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n, 41092, Seville, Spain

    Luis Pérez-Lombard & David Velázquez

  2. Building Research Establishment (BRE), Garston, Watford, WD25 9XX, UK

    José Ortiz

Authors
  1. Luis Pérez-Lombard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Velázquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Pérez-Lombard.

Appendix

Appendix

  Definitions of key energy efficiency terms
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J. & Velázquez, D. Revisiting energy efficiency fundamentals. Energy Efficiency 6, 239–254 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9180-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9180-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation