Skip to main content
Log in

The Demographic Characteristics of Histological Types of Gastric Cancer with Gender, Age, and Tumor Location

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this paper is to study demographic characteristics of different histological types with patient's gender, age, and tumor location in gastric cancer.

Methods

Three hundred and fifty-one patients who had gastric cancer and undergone a D2 or greater gastrectomy were analyzed retrospectively. The association between gender and age, tumor location and histological types, including tubular adenocarcinoma (TUB), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (POR), signet-ring cell carcinoma (SIG), mucinous adenocarcinoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma (UND), were analyzed by chi-square test or Fisher exact test.

Results

The proportion of TUB in males was higher than that in females (52.4% vs 30.1%, p value of 0.000), and the proportion of SIG in females was higher than that in males (26.2% vs 12.9%, p = 0.002). The prevalence of TUB in patients aged >60 years (54.9%) was significantly higher than that in patients aged 40–60 years (42.2%) and <40 years (24.1%). The prevalence of SIG in the group aged <40 years was significantly higher than that in the other two age groups (44.8% vs 15.6%, 12.7%, p = 0.000). Among the three age groups, the proportion of UND was highest in patients aged 40–60 years (7.8% vs 0%, 1.4%, p = 0.012). The proportion of TUB was highest in the upper part of the stomach as compared to the middle and lower parts of the stomach (56.1% vs 30.8%, 48.2%, p = 0.016). POR was commonly found in the middle part of the stomach as compared to the upper and lower parts (44.6% vs 26.1%, 14.6%, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

TUB was commonly found in the upper part of the stomach in old, male patients, and SIG was the most common histological type in young, female patients. UND was common in middle-aged patients, and POR was mainly found in the middle part of the stomach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Munson JL, O'Mahony R. Radical gastrectomy for cancer of the stomach. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85:1021–32, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henson DE, Dittus C, Younes M, et al. Differential trends in the intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in the United States, 1973–2000: increase in the signet ring cell type. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:765–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of gastric cancer in elderly and middle-aged patients. Am J Surg. 2006;191:216–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Otsuji E, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, et al. Characterization of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. J Surg Oncol. 1998;67:216–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim DY, Joo JK, Ryu SY, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: a comparison with young patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:22–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawamura H, Kondo Y, Osawa S, et al. A clinicopathologic study of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Gastric Cancer. 2001;4:83–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yao JC, Tseng JF, Worah S, et al. Clinicopathologic behavior of gastric adenocarcinoma in Hispanic patients: analysis of a single institution's experience over 15 years. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3094–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaneko S, Yoshimura T. Time trend analysis of gastric cancer incidence in Japan by histological types, 1975–1989. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:400–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adachi Y, Yasuda K, Inomata M, et al. Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type. Cancer. 2000;89:1418–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maruyama M, Takeshita K, Endo M, et al. Clinicopathological study of gastric carcinoma in high- and low-mortality countries: comparison between Japan and the United States. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haruta H, Hosoya Y, Sakuma K, et al. Clinicopathological study of lymph-node metastasis in 1,389 patients with early gastric cancer: assessment of indications for endoscopic resection. J Dig Dis. 2008;9:213–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junxiu Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, J., Zhao, Q. The Demographic Characteristics of Histological Types of Gastric Cancer with Gender, Age, and Tumor Location. J Gastrointest Canc 40, 98–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-009-9107-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-009-9107-6

Keywords

Navigation