Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate interpretations and the reproducibility of interpretations when looking at colposcopic photographs in a forensic setting, as well as discussing some of the dilemmas and pitfalls of forensic colposcopic photography. A total of 316 colposcopic photographs from 51 women taken on three occasions following consensual sexual intercourse, and 78 colposcopic photographs from 39 rape victims, were evaluated by four different observers. Photographs were taken in the same setting, by the same group of investigators, before and after application of toluidine blue dye. The overall Kappa-value for the four observers’ judgment of lesion vs. no lesion was 0.41 which can be interpreted as moderate agreement. Intra-observer agreement was calculated for two of the observers looking at photographs with a 10 months’ time-gap, and the Kappa-values were 0.41 and 0.52. Positive and negative predictive values of the photographs were 82 and 81 % respectively. This study demonstrates relatively poor reliability of colposcopic photography. Some would argue that this makes colposcopic photography a low-quality method of evaluation and that forensic science should aim for higher standards because of its use in court. Others would argue that as long as the limitations of a scientific method are acknowledged then it is still eligible for use. The moderate agreement and accuracy stresses the need for quality control in the gynecological part of a rape examination. Colposcopic photography also provides a good option for supervision and teaching in an ethically difficult setting. It strengthens the legal rights for both victim and perpetrator.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Teixeira WRG. Hymenal colposcopic examination in sexual offenses. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1981;2(3):209–15.
Astrup BS, Ravn P, Lauritsen J, Thomsen JL. Nature, frequency and duration of genital lesions after consensual sexual intercourse-implications for legal proceedings. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;219(1–3):50–6.
Astrup BS, Thomsen JL, Lauritsen J, Ravn P. Detection of spermatozoa following consensual sexual intercourse. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;221(1–3):137–41.
Knight B, Saukko PJ. Knight’s forensic pathology. 3rd ed. London: Arnold; 2004.
Reichenheim ME. Confidence intervals for the kappa statistic. Stata J. 2004;4(4):421–8.
Sinal SH, Lawless MR, Rainey DY, Everett VD, Runyan DK, Frothingham T, et al. Clinician agreement on physical findings in child sexual abuse cases. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(5):497–501.
Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M, Grp NAR. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1279–84.
Jeronimo J, Massad LS, Castle PE, Wacholder S, Schiffman M, Grp NAR. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):833–40.
Ferris DG, Litaker M, Group A. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9(1):29–35.
Muram D, Arheart KL, Jennings SG. Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopic photographs in child sexual abuse evaluations. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1999;12(2):58–61.
Brayden RM, Altemeier WA, Yeager T, Muram D. Interpretations of colposcopic photographs—evidence for competence in assessing sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 1991;15(1–2):69–76.
Adams JA, Girardin B, Faugno D. Adolescent sexual assault: documentation of acute injuries using photo-colposcopy. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2001;14(4):175–80.
Lauber AA, Souma ML. Use of toluidine blue for documentation of traumatic intercourse. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60(5):644–8.
Jewkes R, Christofides N, Vetten L, Jina R, Sigsworth R, Loots L. Medico-legal findings, legal case progression, and outcomes in South African rape cases: retrospective review. PLoS Med. 2009;6(10):e1000164.
Rambow B, Adkinson C, Frost TH, Peterson GF. Female sexual assault—medical and legal implications. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(6):727–31.
Wiley J, Sugar N, Fine D, Eckert LO. Legal outcomes of sexual assault. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(6):1638–41.
Saint-Martin P, Bouyssy M, O’Byrne P. Analysis of 756 cases of sexual assault in Tours (France): medico-legal findings and judicial outcomes. Med Sci Law. 2007;47(4):315–24.
McGregor MJ, Du Mont J, Myhr TL. Sexual assault forensic medical examination: is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(6):639–47.
McLean I, Roberts SA, White C, Paul S. Female genital injuries resulting from consensual and non-consensual vaginal intercourse. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204(1–3):27–33.
Ingemann-Hansen O, Brink O, Sabroe S, Sorensen V, Charles AV. Legal aspects of sexual violence-Does forensic evidence make a difference? Forensic Sci Int. 2008;180(2–3):98–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Astrup, B.S., Lauritsen, J., Thomsen, J.L. et al. Colposcopic photography of genital injury following sexual intercourse in adults. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 9, 24–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-012-9394-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-012-9394-2