Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acute treatment of migraine headache

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Migraine is a common, chronic neurologic disorder that affects approximately 12% of the adult population in Western countries. Once migraine is diagnosed, illness severity must be assessed. Clinicians and patients should then work together to develop a treatment plan based on patient needs and preferences. The goals of treatment usually include reducing the intensity and duration of acute attacks, minimizing the frequency of attacks, minimizing headache-related disability and maximizing health-related quality of life, and avoiding headache escalation and medication misuse. Management of migraine is divided into pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches. Pharmacologic approaches are subdivided into preventive treatment, taken on a daily basis whether or not headache is present, and acute drugs taken to treat individual attacks as they arise. Acute treatments are further divided into nonspecific agents, which work for all types of pain, and migraine-specific treatments. The US Headache Consortium Guidelines recommend stratified care based on the level of disability to help physicians individualize treatment. Using this approach means that simple analgesics are appropriate as first-line acute treatments for less-disabled patients; if simple analgesics are unsuccessful, treatment is escalated for high-end therapies (eg, triptans). For those with high disability levels, migraine-specific acute therapies, such as the triptans, are recommended as the initial treatment, with preventive drugs in selected patients. A variety of behavioral interventions are helpful. The clinician has an armamentarium of ever-expanding variety of medications. With experience, clinicians can match individual patient needs with the specific characteristics of a drug to optimize therapeutic benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Scher AI, Stewart WF, Lipton RB: Migraine and headache: a meta-analytic approach. In Epidemiology of Pain. Edited by Crombie IK. Seattle: IASP Press; 1999:159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Simon D: Medical consultation for migraine: results from the American Migraine Study. Headache 1998, 38:87–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart WF, Shechter A, Lipton RB: Migraine heterogeneity: disability, pain intensity, and attack frequency and duration. Neurology 1994, 44(suppl):24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard A, Massiou H, Herrmann MA: Frequency and profile of migraine patients seen by general practitioners. Semin Hosp Paris 1999, 75:440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edmeads J, Lainez JM, Brandes JL, et al.: Potential of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire as a public health initiative and in clinical practice. Neurology 2001, 56 (suppl):29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lipton RB, Diamond S, Reed M, et al.: Migraine diagnosis and treatment: results from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001, 41:638–645.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Simon D: Medical consultation for migraine: results from the American Migraine Study. Headache 1998, 38:87–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988, 8(suppl):1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD: Migraine: current understanding and treatment. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:257–270. This is an important review of the current treatments for migraine.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goadsby PJ, Olesen J: Diagnosis and management of migraine. BMJ 1996, 312:1279–1288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Cady R, et al.: 2000 Wolfe Award: sumatriptan for the range of headaches in migraine sufferers: results of the Spectrum study. Headache 2000, 40:783–791.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tfelt-Hansen P, Olesen J: Effervescent metoclopramide and aspirin versus effervescent aspirin or placebo for migraine attacks: a double-blind study. Cephalalgia 1984, 4:107–111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology: appropriate use of ergotamine tartrate and dihydroergotamine in the treatment of migraine and status migrainosus. Neurology 1995, 45:585–587.

  14. Tfelt-Hansen P, Saxena PR, Dahlof C, et al.: Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine: a review and European consensus. Brain 2000, 123:9–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Diamond S: Treatment of migraine with isometheptene, acetaminophen, and dichloralphenazone combination: a double-blind, crossover trial. Headache 1976, 15:282–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bigal ME, Lipton RB, Krymchantowski AV: The medical management of migraine. Am J Therap 2003, in press.

  17. Gillis JC, Benfield P, Goa KL: Transnasal butorphanol: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in acute pain management. Drugs 1995, 50:157–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tfelt-Hansen P, Saxena PR: Ergot alkaloids in the acute treatment of migraine. In The Headaches. Edited by Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Welch KMA. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silberstein SD: The pharmacology of ergotamine and dihydroergotamine. Headache 1997, 37(suppl):15–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tfelt-Hansen P: Ergotamine, dihydroergotamine: current uses and problems. Curr Med Res Opin 2001, 17(suppl):S30-S34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tfelt-Hansen P, Saxena PR, Dahlof C, et al.: Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine: a review and European consensus. Brain 2000, 123:9–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bigal ME, Tepper SJ: Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2003, 7:55–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lipton RB: Ergotamine tartrate and dihydroergotamine mesylate: safety profiles. Headache 1997, 37(suppl):S33-S41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ, Bigal ME, Sheftell FD: The triptan formulations: how to match patients and products. CNS Drugs 2003, 17:431–447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ: Triptans in acute treatment of migraine: a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Lancet 2001, 358:1268–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Roon KI, Lipton RB: Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia 2002, 22:633–658. This paper presents the results of a meta-analysis comparing the triptans.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ: Triptans are all different. Arch Neurol 2001, 58:1479–80. This paper highlights the differences among the triptans.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Welch KM, Saiers J, Salonen R: Triptans and coronary spasm. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000, 68:337–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lipton RB: Disability assessment as a basis for stratified care. Cephalalgia 1998, 18:40–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Stone AM, et al.: Stratified care vs step care strategies for migraine: results of the Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study. JAMA 2000, 284:2599–2605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Silbersten SD: Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2000, 55:754–763.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lofland JH, Johnson NE, Batenhorst AS, et al.: Changes in resource use and outcomes for patients with migraine treated with sumatriptan. Arch Intern Med 1999, 159:857–863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bigal, M.E., Lipton, R.B. Acute treatment of migraine headache. Curr Treat Options Neurol 5, 423–430 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-996-0011-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-996-0011-0

Keywords

Navigation