Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Influence of a Defendant’s Chronological Age, Developmental Age, and Race on Mock Juror Decision Making

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine whether a defendant’s developmental age, chronological age, and race influenced mock jurors’ decision making. Mock jurors (N = 444) read a trial transcript involving an assault where the defendant allegedly shoved the victim to the ground at a grocery store. The defendant’s developmental age (14 or 24 years old), chronological age (14 or 24 years old), and race (White, Black, or Aboriginal-Canadian) were varied. Mock jurors rendered a verdict and rated their perceptions of the defendant. Developmental age was found to influence verdict decisions such that a developmentally 24-year-old was given more guilty verdicts than a developmentally 14-year-old. Race was also influential such that the Black defendant received fewer guilty verdicts than the White defendant; no significant interactions were present. The presence of a developmental delay influenced mock jurors’ guilt ratings such that the defendant who was developmentally delayed received lower guilt ratings compared to a typically developing defendant. These results suggest that defendants with a developmental delay may be perceived more favorably, regardless of their race, and thus given more lenient treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The White defendant was used as the reference group.

References

  • Bagby R, Parker J, Rector N, Kalemba V (1994) Racial prejudice in the Canadian legal system. Law Hum Behav 18:339–350. doi:10.1007/BF01499592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein BH (1999) The ecological validity of jury simulations: is the jury still out? Law Hum Behav 23:75–91. doi:10.1023/A:1022326807441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms BL, Nysse-Carris KL, Harris T, Tyda K (2003) Jurors’ perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law Hum Behav 27:205–227. doi:10.1023/A:1022551314668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms B, Davis S, Epstein M (2004) Effects of victim and defendant race on jurors’ decisions in child sexual abuse cases. J Appl Soc Psychol 34:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley A, Mayzer R, Schefter M, Olufs E, Miller J, Laver M (2012) Juvenile competency and responsibility: public perceptions. J Appl Soc Psychol 42:2411–2432. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00947.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruer K, Pozzulo J (2014) Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision making. Leg Criminol Psychol 19:332–348. doi:10.1111/lcrop.12001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corenblum B, Stephan WG (2001) White fears and native apprehensions: an integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Can J Behav Sci 33:251–268. doi:10.1037/h0087147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker A, Hodgins S (1997) The criminality of noninstitutionalized mentally retarded persons: evidence from a birth cohort followed to age 30. Crim Justice Behav 24:432–454. doi:10.1177/0093854897024004003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine DJ, Caughlin DE (2014) Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychol Public Policy Law 20:109–134. doi:10.1037/law0000006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (1986) The aversive form of racism. In: Dovidio J, Gaertner S (eds) Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Academic Press, Toronto, pp 61–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghetti S, Redlich AD (2001) Reactions to youth crime: perceptions of accountability and competency. Behav Sci Law 19:33–52. doi:10.1002/bls.426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greathouse S, Sothmann C, Levett L, Kovera M (2011) The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases. Law Hum Behav 35:427–439. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9247-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock G, Zanna MP, Esses VM (1994) The (limited) role of trait-laden stereotypes in predicting attitudes toward native peoples. Br J Soc Psychol 33:83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haegerich T, Salerno J, Bottoms B (2013) Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation? Psychol Public Policy Law 19:81–97. doi:10.1037/a0027808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CS, Kaplan MF (2003) The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 25(1):1–13. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2501_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin AE (2000) Adolescent development, mental disorders, and decision making of delinquent youths. In: Grisso T, Schwartz RG (eds) Youth on trial: a developmental perspective on juvenile justice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 33–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr H, Callender H (2013) Effectively responding to the rising challenge of mental health and addictions in corrections: how to effectively and efficiently treat these issues to reduce recidivism. Paper presented at the Canadian Congress on Criminal Justice Conference, Vancouver, BC

  • Leistico AR, Salekin RT (2003) Testing the reliability and validity of the risk, sophistication-maturity, and treatment amenability instrument (RST-i): an assessment tool for juvenile offenders. Int J Forensic Ment Health 2:101–117. doi:10.1080/14999013.2003.10471182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeder EM, Burdett J (2013) The combined effect of defendant race and alleged gang affiliation on mock juror decision-making. Psychiatry Psychol Law 20:188–201. doi:10.1080/13218719.2011.633330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeder EM, Yamamoto S, Saliba P (2015) The influence of defendant race and victim physical attractiveness on juror decision-making in a sexual assault trial. Psychol Crime Law 21:62–79. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2014.915325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzella R, Feingold A (1994) The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Soc Psychol 24:1315–1338. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TL, Haw RM, Pfeifer JE, Meissner CA (2005) Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: a meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law Hum Behav 29(6):621–637. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Najdowski CJ, Bottoms BL (2011) Understanding jurors’ judgments in cases involving juvenile defendants: effects of confession evidence and intellectual disability. Psychol Public Policy Law 18:297–337. doi:10.1037/a0025786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najdowski CJ, Bottoms BL, Vargas MC (2009) Jurors’ perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behav Sci Law 27:401–430. doi:10.1002/bsl.873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe DJ (2002) Persuasion: theory & research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Correctional Investigator (2013) Annual report from the Government of Canada. Retrieved on August 9, 2014 from http://www.oci-bec.gc.ca/rpt/pdf/annrpt/annrpt20112012-eng.pdf

  • Pfeifer JE, Ogloff JR (2003) Mock juror’s ratings of guilt in Canada: modern racism and ethnic heritage. Soc Behav Personal 31(3):301–312. doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.3.301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. v. Williams (1998) 1 S.C.R. 1128

  • Riva G, Teruzzi T, Anolli L (2003) The use of the internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyberpsychol Behav 6:73–80. doi:10.1089/109493103321167983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P, Davies M (2007) Perceptions of victims and perpetrators in a depicted child sexual abuse case: gender and age factors. J Interpers Violence 22:566–584. doi:10.1177/0886260506298827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salekin R, Yff R, Neumann C, Leistico A, Zalot A (2002) Juvenile transfer to adult courts: a look at the prototypes for dangerousness, sophistication-maturity, and amenability to treatment through a legal lens. Psychol Public Policy Law 8:373–410. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.8.4.373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller RA, Kazoleas V, Kawakami K (2009) The impact of prejudice screening procedures on racial bias in the courtroom. Law Hum Behav 33(4):320–328. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9153-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semple J, Woody WD (2011) Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters. Psychol Rep 109:301–308. doi:10.2466/07.17.PR0.109.4.301-308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers SR, Ellsworth PC (2000) Race in the courtroom: perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 26(3):1367–1379. doi:10.1177/0146167200263005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers SR, Ellsworth PC (2009) “Race salience” in juror decision-making. Misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions. Behav Sci Law 27:599–609. doi:10.1002/bsl.877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney LT, Haney C (1992) The influence of race on sentencing: a meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behav Sci Law 10:179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker CM, Woody WD (2011) Juror decision making for juveniles tried as adults: the effects of defendant age, crime type, and crime outcome. Psychol Crime Law 17:659–675. doi:10.1080/1068316090349471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warling D, Peterson-Badali M (2003) The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant’s age on trial outcomes. Behav Sci Law 21:63–82. doi:10.1002/bsl.517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Pica.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pica, E., Pettalia, J. & Pozzulo, J. The Influence of a Defendant’s Chronological Age, Developmental Age, and Race on Mock Juror Decision Making. J Police Crim Psych 32, 66–76 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9201-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9201-1

Keywords

Navigation