Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Motives of Criminal Captive-takers: A Preliminary Investigation

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Captive-taking is a significant problem that faces the law enforcement, military, intelligence, and general population communities. To date no research has been found that focuses specifically on the motives of captive-takers identified by the perpetrators themselves. In addition, a significant problem in the available literature is a lack of standardized research methods applied to these offender investigations. Therefore, rendering comparisons across these studies becomes difficult, and the applicability to other specific offender groups impossible. Method: The sample included seven individuals convicted of captive-taking. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews that were developed using Perpetrator-Motive Research Design. Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research (CQR). Results: Analyses of the transcripts revealed 59 domains that were further broken into 23 micro-motives that relate to the participants’ cognitions, affect, behavior, and environmental influences on their criminal behaviors. Conclusion: Results support several leading theories of crime, including general strain theory, social control theory, and moral disengagement. Implications for psychologists who consult with and assist government agencies, including those involved with law enforcement and crisis negotiation teams are presented. For example, results have important implications for psychologists engaged with crisis (hostage) negotiation units by providing common themes and motives of captive-takers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hard breaks were scheduled at approximately every hour; soft breaks were not planned, but may have occurred if the interviewee needed a restroom break, or the interview team needed to discuss one of the participant’s answers, for example.

References

  • Agnew R (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 30:47–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew R (2009) General strain theory. In: Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ, Hall GP (eds) Handbook on crime and deviance. Springer, New York, pp 169–185

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 3:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol 32:513–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HCO, Frei A (2013) Female sexual homicide offenders: an examination of an under researched offender population. Homicide Stud Interdisciplinary Int J 17:96–118. doi:10.1177/1088767912449625

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and criminal rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen AE, Clarke AY, Kuipers E, Hodgins S, Dean K, Fahy T (2012) A multisite randomized trial of a cognitive skills program for male mentally disordered offenders: violence and antisocial behavior outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 80:114–120. doi:10.1037/a0030291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, J. A., Amores, M., Haist, J., Chamberlain, S., & Bilsky, K. (2011). Initial validation of real-time voice recognition interpretation methodology. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

  • Daniels, J. A., Angleman, A. J., Vecchi, G. M., Bilsky, K. D. P., Leonard, J., Grinnan, E….& Ramirez, B (2015). A pilot study of criminal captive-takers’ modus operandi. Journal of Police & Criminal Psychology, Online publication, April 2, 2015. doi:10.1007/s11896-015-9167-4

  • Daniels, J. A., Bradley, M. C., Cramer, B. P., Winkler, A., Kinebrew, K., & Crockett, D (2007). Factors related to successful resolution of armed hostage/barricade events in schools: A qualitative analysis. Psychol sch 44:601–613.

  • Daniels, J. A., & Page, J. W. (2012). School barricaded captive-taking: A literature review and critique. Aggress violent behav 17:140–147. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.11.002

  • Daniels, J. A., Volungis, A., Pshenishny, E., Gandhi, P., Winkler, A., Bradley, M. C., & Cramer, D. P (2010). A qualitative investigation of averted school rampages. Couns Psychol 38:69–95.

  • Gallavan DB, Newman JL (2013) Predictors of burnout among correctional mental health professionals. Psychol Serv 10:115–122. doi:10.1037/a0031341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher C, Mohandie K, Turner J, Gelles MG (1998) The role of the psychologist in crisis/hostage negotiations. Behav Sci Law 16:455–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelwood RR, Burgess AW (2001) Practical aspects of rape investigation: a multidisciplinary approach, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CE, Williams EN (2012) The sample. In: Hill CE (ed) Consensual qualitative research: a practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill CE, Thompson BJ, Williams EN (1997) A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Couns Psychol 25:517–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs BA, Wright R (1999) Stick-up, street culture, and offender motivation. Criminology 37:149–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs BA, Topalli V, Wright R (2003) Carjacking, streetlife and offender motivation. Br J Criminol 43:673–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley EL, Edwards KM, Dardis CM, Gidycz CA (2015) Motives for physical dating violence among college students: a gendered analysis. Psychol Violence 5:56–65. doi:10.1037/a0036171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany N, Thompson BJ, Hill CE (2012) Cross-analysis. In: Hill CE (ed) Consensual qualitative research: a practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaletta PR, Patry MW, Gross NR, Butterfield PM, McLearen AM, Patterson KL, Norcross JC (2011) Clinical practice in corrections: providing service, obtaining experience. Psychol Serv 8:343–355. doi:10.1037/a0025315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMains MJ, Mullins WC (2006) Crisis negotiations: managing critical incidents and hostage situations in law enforcement and corrections, 3rd edn. LexisNexis Anderson Publishers, Albany, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron MS, Goldstein AP (1979) Hostage. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noesner GW (1999) Negotiation concepts for commanders. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 6–15

  • Noesner G (2010) Stalling for time: my life as an FBI hostage negotiator. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olver ME, Wong SCP (2013) Treatment programs for high risk sexual offenders: programs and offender characteristics, attrition, treatment change and recidivism. Aggress Violent Behav 18:579–591. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2013.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read JM, Powell MB (2011) Investigative interviewing of child sex offender suspects: strategies to assist the application of a narrative framework. J Investig Psychol Offender Profiling 8:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J (2009) Understanding motivation and emotion, 5th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Regini C (2002) Crisis negotiation teams: selection and training. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 1–5

  • Thompson BJ, Vivino BL, Hill CE (2012) Coding the data: domains and core ideas. In: Hill CE (ed) Consensual qualitative research: a practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi GM, Van Hasselt VB, Romano SJ (2005) Crisis (hostage) negotiation: current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution. Aggress Violent Behav 10:533–551. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2004/10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi GM, Van Hasselt VB, Angleman AJ (2013) The perpetrator-motive research design: a strategy for understanding motivations, values, and tactics of criminal offenders. Aggress Violent Behav 18:11–18. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston R, Marshall LL, Coker AL (2007) Women’s motives for violent and nonviolent behaviors in conflicts. J Interpers Violence 22:1043–1065. doi:10.1177/0886260507303191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb C (2001) Cold zero: inside the FBI hostage rescue team. Little, Brown & Company, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Daniels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daniels, J.A., Angleman, A.J., Vecchi, G.M. et al. Motives of Criminal Captive-takers: A Preliminary Investigation. J Police Crim Psych 31, 250–260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9188-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9188-z

Key words

Navigation