Skip to main content
Log in

Carbohydrate Provision in the Era of Tight Glucose Control

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glycemic control in the critically ill patient has remained a controversial issue over the last decade. Several large trials, with widely varying results, have generated significant interest in defining the optimal target for blood-glucose control necessary for improving care while minimizing morbidity. Nutritional support has evolved into an additional area of critical care where appropriate practices have been associated with improved patient outcomes. Carbohydrate provision can impact blood-glucose levels, and the relationship between nutrition and glucose levels has become more complex in the era of improved glycemic control. This review discusses the controversy surrounding intensive-insulin therapy in the intensive care unit and explores the relationship with nutritional support, both in the enteral and parenteral form. Achieving realistic goals in both carbohydrate provision and glycemic control may improve patient outcome, and are not mutually exclusive practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:449–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pavy FW. Fundamental Points Connected with the Pathology of Diabetes Mellitus. Br Med J. 1900;2(2083):1558–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Turina M, Fry DE, Polk Jr HC. Acute hyperglycemia and the innate immune system: clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(7):1624–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pickup JC, Chusney GD, Thomas SM, Burt D. Plasma interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor alpha and blood cytokine production in type 2 diabetes. Life Sci. 2000;67(3):291–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Esper RJ, Vilariño JO, Machado RA, Paragano A. Endothelial dysfunction in normal and abnormal glucose metabolism. Adv Cardiol. 2008;45:17–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mowery NT, May AK, Collier BC, et al. Glucose metabolism, not obesity, predicts mortality in critically ill surgical patients. Am Surg. 2010;76(12):1377–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson LH, Kim HT, Ma Y, et al. Acute, muscle-type specific insulin resistance following injury. Mol Med. 2008;14(11–12):715–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed N, Dávalos A, Eriksson N, et al. SITS Investigators: Association of admission blood glucose and outcome in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis: results from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR). Arch Neurol. 2010;67(9):1123–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brix-Christensen V, Andersen SK, Andersen R, et al. Acute hyperinsulinemia restrains endotoxin-induced systemic inflammatory response: an experimental study in a porcine model. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(4):861–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Albacker T, Carvalho G, Schricker T, Lachapelle K. High-dose insulin therapy attenuates systemic inflammatory response in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(1):20–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arabi YM, Dabbagh OC, Tamin HM, et al. Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:190–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:125–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De La Rosa GDC, Donado JH, Restrepo AH, et al. Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalized in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):R120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Preiser JC, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S, et al. A prospective randomized multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1738–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krinsley JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients. Mayo Clin Pro. 2004;79:992–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lecomte P, Foubert L, Nobels F, et al. Dynamictight glycemic control during and after cardiac surgery is effective, feasible and safe. AneshAnalg. 2008;107:51–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lecomte P, Van Vlem B, Coddens J, et al. Tight perioperative glucose control is associated with a reduction in renal impairment and renal failure in non-diabetic cardiac surgical patients. Crit Care. 2008;12:R154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Furnary AP, Cheek DB, Holmes SC, et al. Achieving right glycemic control in the operating room: lessons learned from 12 years in the trenches of a paradigm shift in anesthetic care. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc. 2006;18:339–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al.: Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:1283–97. This large prospective RTC (6000 patients) conducted in a heterogenous ICU population demonstrated significantly higher rates of hypoglycemia and 90-day mortality utilizing IIT protocols to maintain glucose levels <108 mg/dL.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vriesendorp TM, DeVries JH, van Santen S, et al. Evaluation of short- term consequences of hypoglycemia in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2714–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, et al. Hypoglycemia and outcome in critical illness. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(3):217–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dotson S, Freeman R, Failing HJ, Adler GK. Hypoglycemia increases serum interleuldn-6 levels in healthy men and women. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1222–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Keller-Wood ME, Shinsako J, Dallman MF. Inhibition of the adreno-corticotropin and corticosteroid responses to hypoglycemia after prior stress. Endocrinology. 1983;113:491–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dieguez G, Fernandez N, Garcia JL, et al. Role of nitric oxide in the effects of hypoglycemia on the cerebral circulation in awake goats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;330:185–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Egi M, Bellomo R. Reducing Glycemic variability in intensive care unit patients: a new therapeutic target? J Diab Sci Tech. 2009;3(6):1302–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. • Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Jacka MJ, et al.: The impact of early hypoglycemia and blood glucose variability on outcome in critical illness. Crit Care. 2009, 13(3): 1–10. Retrospective review of 66,000 patients demonstrated the incidence of blood glucose variability and hypoglycemia in the ICU (13%) and their value as independent predictors of mortality.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van den Berghe G, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven blood glucose target? J ClinEndocrinolMetab. 2009;94(9):3163–70.

    Google Scholar 

  29. •• Marik PE, Preiser JC: Toward understanding tight glycemic control in the ICU: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest. 2010 Mar, 137(3):544–51. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Meta-analytic techniques applied to seven PRCTs including 11,425 patients demonstrated significantly higher hypoglycemic episodes when utilizing IIT protocols and no change in mortality. More interestingly, a relationship between treatment effect and the use of PN was demonstrated, suggesting a possible explanation for the differences observed in the major trials.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Waeschle RM, Moerer O, Hilgers R, et al. The impact of the severity of sepsis on the risk of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability. Crit Care. 2008;12:R129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krinsley JS. The severity of sepsis: yet another factor influencing glycemic control. Crit Care. 2008;12:194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eslami S, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E, et al. A systematic review on quality indicators for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: need for an unambiguous indicator reference subset. Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R139. Epub 2008 Nov 11. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanji S, Buffie J, Hutton B, et al. Reliability of point-of-care testing for glucose measurement in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(12):2778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Villet S, Chiolero R, Bollman M, et al. Negative impact of hypocaloric feeding and energy balance on clinical outcomes in ICU patients. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:502–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P: (2003) Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD004423. no further risk of aspiration from allowing fluids.

  36. Noblett SE, Watson DS, Huong H, et al. Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(7):563–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):961–9. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Soop M, Carlson GL, Hopkinson J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. Br J Surg. 2004;91(9):1138–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuill KA, Richardson RA, Davidson HI, et al. The administration of an oral carbohydrate-containing fluid prior to major elective upper-gastrointestinal surgery preserves skeletal muscle mass postoperatively-a randomised clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(1):32–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Svanfeldt M, Thorell A, Hausel J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment on postoperative whole-body protein and glucose kinetics. Br J Surg. 2007;94(11):1342–50. whole body protein maintained.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mesejo A, Acosta JA, Ortega C, et al. Comparison of a high-protein disease-specific enteral formula with a high-protein enteral formula in hyperglycemic critically ill patients. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):295–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. •• McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, et al.: A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors; American College of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine: Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009 May-Jun, 33(3):277–316. An excellent resource presenting guidelines supported by the SCCM and ASPEN regarding nutritional support in the critically ill patient.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. • Matsushima K, Cook A, Tyner T, et al.: Parenteral nutrition: a clear and present danger unabated by tight glucose control. Am J Surg. 2010 Sep, 200(3):386–90. Prospective cohort study demonstrating increased infectious complications (BSI, CRBSI) in patients receiving PN despite adequate glucose control.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dan A, Jacques TC, O’Leary MJ. Enteral nutrition versus glucose-based or lipid-based parenteral nutrition and tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients. Crit Care Resusc. 2006;8(4):283–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin LY, Lin HC, Lee PC, et al. Hyperglycemia correlates with outcomes in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Am J Med Sci. 2007;333(5):261–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hoekstra M, Schoorl MA, van der Horst IC, et al. Computer-assisted glucose regulation during rapid step-wise increases of parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a proof of concept study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(5):549–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith R. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, K.R., Lawson, C.M., Smith, V.L. et al. Carbohydrate Provision in the Era of Tight Glucose Control. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13, 388–394 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-011-0204-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-011-0204-x

Keywords

Navigation