Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Economic Evaluation of a Small-Scale Timber Harvesting Operation in Western Maryland, USA

  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As forests of the eastern United States become fragmented into smaller ownership parcels, there is a growing need for timber harvesting contactors who can economically harvest timber and perform silvicultural operations on small tracts. Traditional large-scale harvesting operators are ill-suited for work on small parcels, due to their high fixed costs. By contrast, small-scale operators, characterized by few workers and low capital investment, offer an opportunity to serve this landowner segment. This paper presents financial and productivity results from a small-scale timber harvesting pilot study conducted on small forested parcels in western Maryland, USA. Acceptable financial performance is possible for these operations, provided that the operator pays close attention to the important factors determining productivity and profitability, including: (1) average tree volume, (2) net delivered price, (3) time utilization, and (4) distance to the site. Although profitable harvesting of saw log quality trees on parcels less than 10 ha is possible, harvesting of small or poor-quality trees remains economically unattractive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cubbage F (1983a) Economics of forest tract size: theory and literature. USDA forest service, general technical report SO-41, 21 pp

  • Cubbage F (1983b) Simulated effects of productivity rates, input costs, and stand volumes on harvesting costs. For Prod J 33:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage F, Greene W, Lyon J (1989) Tree size and species, stand volume, and tract size: effects on southern harvesting costs. S J App For 13:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCoster L (1998) The boom in forest owners—a bust for forestry? J For 96:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene W, Harris T, DeForest C, Wang J (1996) Harvesting cost implications of changes in the size of timber sales in Georgia. S J App For 21:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderick D (2008) Small woodlot harvesting: a guide for landowners, land managers and forest products operators. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Forest Service. Cited 17 Nov 2010. Available via http://www.dnr.state.md.us/irc/docs/00013497.pdf

  • Internal Revenue Service (2005) Rev Proc 2005-78. Cited 17 Nov 2010. Available via http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-05-75.pdf

  • Kittredge D, Mauri M, McGuire E (1996) Decreasing woodlot size and the future of timber sales in Massachusetts: when is an operation too small? N J App For 13:96–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang J, Miller G, McNeel J (2006) Production economics of harvesting small-diameter hardwood stands in central Appalachia. For Prod J 56:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Londo A, Grebner D (2004) Economies of scale and forest management in Mississippi. In: Connor K (ed) Proceedings of the 12th biennial southern silvicultural research conference, general technical report SRS-71, Asheville

  • Maryland Department of Natural Resources (2001) Maryland forest stewardship program strategic plan, 2002–2006, Annapolis

  • Milauskas S, Wang J (2006) West Virginia logger characteristics. For Prod J 56:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Row C (1978) Economies of tract size in timber growing. J For 76:576–579, 582

    Google Scholar 

  • Updegraff K, Blinn C (2000) Applications of small-scale forest harvesting equipment in the United States and Canada. University of Minnesota Staff paper series no 143, St Paul

  • West Virginia Division of Forestry (2010) West Virginia statewide forest resource assessment. Cited 17 Nov 2010. Available via http://www.wvforestry.com/DOF100Assessment_Revised_091310_Part1.pdf

  • Wilhoit J, Rummer B (1999) Application of small-scale systems: evaluation of alternatives. Paper presented at the ASAE/CSAE annual international meeting, Toronto, 18–21 July 1999

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank our harvesting contractor, Matt Diehl, for his significant contributions to this project. We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of Frank Stark and Brian Knox, the forestry consultants who marked the stands for harvest and performed pre- and post-harvest evaluations. Funding for this project was provided by the US Forest Service Innovation Grant and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, PO Box 6125, Morgantown, WV, 26506-6125, USA

    Stuart A. Moss

  2. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service, 3 Pershing Street, Room 101, Cumberland, MD, 21502, USA

    Daniel B. Hedderick

Authors
  1. Stuart A. Moss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel B. Hedderick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart A. Moss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, S.A., Hedderick, D.B. An Economic Evaluation of a Small-Scale Timber Harvesting Operation in Western Maryland, USA. Small-scale Forestry 11, 101–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9171-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9171-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation