Abstract
An analysis of usability aspects and accuracy for three different methods of neurosurgical intervention—stereotaxy, neuro-navigation, and robotic assistance—was accomplished in a detailed study including clinicians with different experience levels. Accuracy tests with a specially designed phantom were performed under clinical conditions according to EN ISO 9283. Test scenarios were designed according to a realistic clinical work-flow for the brain biopsy process. This paper presents the results of the accuracy evaluation as well as a discussion of the results and further steps.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cleary K, Nguyen C (2001) State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput Aided Surg 6:312–328
Rössler K (2005) State of the art—hirnbiopsie. J Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr 3:11–14
Wirtz CR, Kunze S (1998) Neuronavigation: Computerassistierte Neurochirurgie. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 95:A2384–2390 Heft 39
Cleary K, Melzer A, Watson V, Kronreif G, Stoianovici D (2006) Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of the-art. Minim Invasive Ther 15(2):101–113
Kronreif G, Fürst M, Ptacek W, Kornfeld M, Kettenbach J (2007) Robotic platform B-RobII: in vitro tests and results. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on computer aided surgery around the head, Innsbruck, Austria
Stiehl JB, Bach J, Heck DA (2007) Validation and metrology in CAOS. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, DiGioia AM, eds., Navigation and MIS in orthopedic surgery, Ch. 9. Springer, Germany, pp 68–78
Barrera A, Bach B, Kazanzides P, Haider H (2007) Validation of an ASTM standard proposed to assess localizer functionality of CAOS systems: a joint effort by three laboratories. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual congress of International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), Paris, p 81
Kazanzides P (2006) Surgical robots and phantom (artifact) devices. In: Proceedings of the ASTM workshop on medical devices metrology and standards needs. ASTM, NIST, NCI, FDA and U.T. Arlington, Atlanta
Chiao J, Goldman J, Heck D, Kazanzides P, Peine W, Stiehl J, Yen D, Dagalakis N (2008) Metrology and standards needs for some categories of medical devices. J Res NIST 113(2):121–129
Dagalakis N, Kim Y, Sawyer D, Shakarji C (2007) Development of tools for measuring the performance of computer assisted orthopaedic hip surgery systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on performance metrics for intelligent systems (PerMIS), Gaithersburg, pp 180–187
ISO 9283 (1998) Manipulating industrial robots—performance criteria and related test methods
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kronreif, G., Ptacek, W., Kornfeld, M. et al. Evaluation of robotic assistance in neurosurgical applications. J Robotic Surg 6, 33–39 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0327-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0327-y