Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of robotic assistance in neurosurgical applications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of usability aspects and accuracy for three different methods of neurosurgical intervention—stereotaxy, neuro-navigation, and robotic assistance—was accomplished in a detailed study including clinicians with different experience levels. Accuracy tests with a specially designed phantom were performed under clinical conditions according to EN ISO 9283. Test scenarios were designed according to a realistic clinical work-flow for the brain biopsy process. This paper presents the results of the accuracy evaluation as well as a discussion of the results and further steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleary K, Nguyen C (2001) State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput Aided Surg 6:312–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rössler K (2005) State of the art—hirnbiopsie. J Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr 3:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wirtz CR, Kunze S (1998) Neuronavigation: Computerassistierte Neurochirurgie. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 95:A2384–2390 Heft 39

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cleary K, Melzer A, Watson V, Kronreif G, Stoianovici D (2006) Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of the-art. Minim Invasive Ther 15(2):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kronreif G, Fürst M, Ptacek W, Kornfeld M, Kettenbach J (2007) Robotic platform B-RobII: in vitro tests and results. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on computer aided surgery around the head, Innsbruck, Austria

  6. Stiehl JB, Bach J, Heck DA (2007) Validation and metrology in CAOS. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, DiGioia AM, eds., Navigation and MIS in orthopedic surgery, Ch. 9. Springer, Germany, pp 68–78

  7. Barrera A, Bach B, Kazanzides P, Haider H (2007) Validation of an ASTM standard proposed to assess localizer functionality of CAOS systems: a joint effort by three laboratories. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual congress of International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), Paris, p 81

  8. Kazanzides P (2006) Surgical robots and phantom (artifact) devices. In: Proceedings of the ASTM workshop on medical devices metrology and standards needs. ASTM, NIST, NCI, FDA and U.T. Arlington, Atlanta

  9. Chiao J, Goldman J, Heck D, Kazanzides P, Peine W, Stiehl J, Yen D, Dagalakis N (2008) Metrology and standards needs for some categories of medical devices. J Res NIST 113(2):121–129

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dagalakis N, Kim Y, Sawyer D, Shakarji C (2007) Development of tools for measuring the performance of computer assisted orthopaedic hip surgery systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on performance metrics for intelligent systems (PerMIS), Gaithersburg, pp 180–187

  11. ISO 9283 (1998) Manipulating industrial robots—performance criteria and related test methods

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Kronreif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kronreif, G., Ptacek, W., Kornfeld, M. et al. Evaluation of robotic assistance in neurosurgical applications. J Robotic Surg 6, 33–39 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0327-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0327-y

Keywords

Navigation