Abstract
A new high performance tool, the disc prosthesis, endows the degenerative cervical rachidian pathology. It allows us to fill the fusions’ lacunas by protecting the adjacent levels from an accelerated degeneration while preserving the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the cervical spine, especially its mobility. At the present time, there exist several models of cervical disc prosthesis on the market. We have tested some of them such as the Bryan®, the Prestige® and the Prodisc®. We have currently chosen the Spineart Baguera® C. In this article, we are going to present our experience of this prosthesis which was implanted in 49 patients between February and December 2007.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4(Suppl 6): 190S–194S
Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2): 79–85
Srour R, Kuzeawu A (2007) Clinical outcome in cervical arthroplasty by Brian®, ProDisc®, Prestige®, and Baguera® 36 months results. Eu Musculoskelet Rev March 56–58
Snyder JT, Tzermiadianos MN, Ghanayem AJ, et al. (2007) Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement. Spine 32(26): 2965–2969
Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, et al. (2008) The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 8: 711–716
Heidecke V, Burkert W, Brucke M, Rainov NG (2008) Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease: clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150(5): 453–459
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benmekhbi, M., Mortada, J., Lungu, G. et al. Baguera cervical disc prosthesis. Interact Surg 3, 201–204 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11610-008-0086-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11610-008-0086-2