Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Influences Associated with Gambling in Young Adulthood

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social and environmental influences on gambling behavior are important to understand because localities can control the sanction and location of gambling opportunities. This study explores whether neighborhood disadvantage is associated with gambling among predominantly low-income, urban young adults and to explore if we can find differences in physical vs. compositional aspects of the neighborhood. Data are from a sample of 596 young adults interviewed when they were 21–22 years, who have been participating in a longitudinal study since entering first grade in nine public US Mid-Atlantic inner-city schools (88 % African Americans). Data were analyzed via factor analysis and logistic regression models. One third of the sample (n = 187) were past-year gamblers, 42 % of them gambled more than once a week, and 31 % had gambling-related problems. Those living in moderate and high disadvantaged neighborhoods were significantly more likely to be past-year gamblers than those living in low disadvantaged neighborhoods. Those living in high disadvantaged neighborhoods were ten times more likely than those living in low disadvantaged neighborhoods to have gambling problems. Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor model, an “inhabitant disadvantage factor” and a “surroundings disadvantage factor.” Nearly 60 % of the sample lived in neighborhoods with high inhabitants disadvantage (n = 375) or high surroundings disadvantage (n = 356). High inhabitants disadvantage was associated with past-year frequent gambling (odds ratios (aOR) = 2.26 (1.01, 5.02)) and gambling problems (aOR = 2.81 (1.18, 6.69)). Higher neighborhood disadvantage, particularly aspects of the neighborhood concerning the inhabitants, was associated with gambling frequency and problems among young adult gamblers from an urban, low-income setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilliland JA, Ross NA. Opportunities for video lottery terminal gambling in Montréal: an environmental analysis. Can J Public Health. 2005; 96: 55–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson DH, Gilliland J, Ross NA, et al. Video lottery terminal access and gambling among high school students in Montréal. Can J Public Health. 2006; 97: 202–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiss MJ. The clustering of America. New York: Harper & Row; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Welte JW, Wieczorek WF, Barnes GM, et al. The relationship of ecological and geographic factors to gambling behavior and pathology. J Gambl Stud. 2004; 20: 405–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Gambling Impact Study Commission. National gambling impact study commission final report. Washington, DC: National Gambling Impact Study Commission; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barnes GM, Welte JW, Tidwell MCO, et al. Gambling on the lottery: sociodemographic correlates across the lifespan. J Gambl Stud. 2011; 27: 575–586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Welte J, Wieczorek W, Barnes G, et al. Multiple risk factors for frequent and problem gambling: individual, social and ecological. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006; 36: 1548–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner AB, Bauermeister JA, Zimmerman MA. Neighborhood variation in adolescent alcohol use: examination of socioecological and social disorganization theories. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011; 72: 651–659.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sampson RJ, Groves WB. Community structure and crime: testing social-disorganization theory. Am J Sociol. 1989; 94: 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw C, McKay H. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peacock RB, Day PA, Peacock TD. Adolescent gambling on a Great Lakes Indian Reservation. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 1999; 2: 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearce J, Mason K, Hiscock R, et al. A national study of neighbourhood access to gambling opportunities and individual gambling behaviour. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62: 862–868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Volberg RA. Gambling and problem gambling in Nevada. Carson City: Department of Human Resources; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shinogle J, Norris DF, Park D, et al. Gambling prevalence in Maryland: a baseline analysis. Baltimore: Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Children and youth in neighborhood contexts. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003; 12: 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ialongo N, Poduska J, Werthamer L, et al. The distal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on conduct problems and disorder in early adolescence. J Emot Behav Disord. 2001; 9: 146–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 1987; 144: 1184–1188.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, revised third edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Volberg RA, Nysse-Carris KL, Gerstein DR. 2006 California problem gambling prevalence survey. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elliot DS, Huizinga D, Ageton SS. Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harrell SP. A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: implications for the well-being of people of color. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000; 70: 42–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ensminger ME, Forrest CB, Riley AW, et al. The validity of measures of socioeconomic status of adolescents. J Adolesc Res. 2000; 15: 392–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers WH. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech Bull. 1993; 13: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brook DW, Brook JS, Rubenstone E, et al. Developmental associations between externalizing behaviors, peer delinquency, drug use, perceived neighborhood crime, and violent behavior in urban communities. Aggress Behav. 2011; 37: 349–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a research grant from the National Institute of Child and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (NICHD-NIH, RO1HD060072—P.I. Dr. Martins). The Intervention Trial is funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse grant RO1 DA11796 (P.I. Dr. Ialongo). We thank Scott Hubbard for data management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia S. Martins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martins, S.S., Storr, C.L., Lee, G.P. et al. Environmental Influences Associated with Gambling in Young Adulthood. J Urban Health 90, 130–140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9751-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9751-1

Keywords

Navigation