Abstract
Sensitivity analysis of a model can identify key variables affecting the performance of the model. Uncertainty analysis is an essential indicator of the precision of the model. In this study, the sensitivity and uncertainty of the Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment-Low Impact Development 2.1 (L-THIA-LID 2.1) model in estimating runoff and water quality were analyzed in an urbanized watershed in central Indiana, USA, using Sobol′‘s global sensitivity analysis method and the bootstrap method, respectively. When estimating runoff volume and pollutant loads for the case in which no best management practices (BMPs) and no low impact development (LID) practices were implemented, CN (Curve Number) was the most sensitive variable and the most important variable when calibrating the model before implementing practices. When predicting water quantity and quality with varying levels of BMPs and LID practices implemented, Ratio_r (Practice outflow runoff volume/inflow runoff volume) was the most sensitive variable and therefore the most important variable to calibrate the model with practices implemented. The output uncertainty bounds before implementing BMPs and LID practices were relatively large, while the uncertainty ranges of model outputs with practices implemented were relatively small. The limited observed data in the same study area and results from other urban watersheds in scientific literature were either well within or close to the uncertainty ranges determined in this study, indicating the L-THIA-LID 2.1 model has good precision.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O'Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986) An introduction to the European Hydrological System—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen,“SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J Hydrol 87(1):61–77
Ahiablame, LM (2012) Development of methods for modeling and evaluation of low impact development practices at the watershed scale. Doctoral dissertation, PURDUE UNIVERSITY, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I (2012) Representation and evaluation of low impact development practices with L-THIA-LID: An example for site planning. Environ Pollut 1(2):p 1
Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I (2013) Effectiveness of low impact development practices in two urbanized watersheds: Retrofitting with rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement. J Environ Manage 119:151–161
Andersson JCM, Pechlivanidis IG, Gustafsson D, Donnelly C, Arheimer B (2015) Key factors for improving large-scale hydrological model performance. European Water 49:77–88
Baird, C, Jennings, M, Ockerman, D, Dybala, T (1996) Characterization of nonpoint sources and loadings to the Corpus Christi bay national estuary program study area; Corpus christi national estuary program, Corpus Christi, TX
Beaulac MN, Reckhow KH (1982) An examination of land use-nutrient export relationships1. J Am Water Resour As 18(6):1013–1024
Bedan ES, Clausen JC (2009) Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from traditional and low impact development watersheds. J Am Water Resour As 45:998–1008. doi:10.1111/j.1752–1688.2009.00342.x
Benaman J, Shoemaker CA (2004) Methodology for analyzing ranges of uncertain model parameters and their impact on total maximum daily load process. J Environ Eng 130(6):648–656
Castaño S, Sanz D, Gómez-Alday JJ (2013) Sensitivity of a Groundwater Flow Model to Both Climatic Variations and Management Scenarios in a Semi-arid Region of SE Spain. Water Resour Manag 27(7):2089–2101
Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24(9):1133–1148
CWP and CSN (Center for Watershed Protection and Chesapeake Stormwater Network) (2008) Technical memorandum: the runoff reduction method. Ellicott City, MD. www.chesapeakestormwater.net
D’Agostino DR, Scardigno A, Lamaddalena N, El Chami D (2014) Sensitivity analysis of coupled hydro-economic models: quantifying climate change uncertainty for decision-making. Water Resour Manag 28(12):4303–4318
Debnath S, Adamala S, Raghuwanshi NS (2015) Sensitivity analysis of FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method for different agro-ecological regions of India. Environmental Processes 2(4):689–704
Dietz ME, Clausen JC (2008) Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J Environ Manage 87(4):560–566
Duan Q, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Rousseau AN, Turcotte R (2003) Calibration of watershed models. Am Geophys Union 6:1–345
Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. The annals of. Statistics 7:1–26
Efron, B, Tibshirani, RJ (1993) An introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, New York
Ellis JB, Mitchell G (2006) Urban diffuse pollution: key data information approaches for the Water Framework Directive. Water Environ J 20(1):19–26
Engel BA, Choi JY, Harbor J, Pandey S (2003) Web-based DSS for hydrologic impact evaluation of small watershed land use changes. Comput Electron Agr 39(3):241–249
Gaur A, Simonovic SP (2015) Towards reducing climate change impact assessment process uncertainty. Environ Process 2(2):275–290
GC and WWE (Geosyntec Consultants and Wright Water Engineers) (2011) International Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Database Technical Summary: Volume Reduction, 27. www.bmpdatabase.org (accessed November, 2012)
Gitau MW, Chen J, Ma Z (2016) Water Quality Indices as Tools for Decision Making and Management. Water Resour Manag 30(8):2591–2610
Haan CT, Storm DE, Al-Issa T, Prabhu S, Sabbagh GJ, Edwards DR (1998) Effect of parameter distributions on uncertainty analysis of hydrologic models. Transactions of the ASAE 41(1):65–70
Hall, JW, Tarantola, S, Bates, PD, Horritt, MS (2005) Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration. J Hydraul Eng 131(2):117–126
Hanel M, Mrkvičková M, Máca P, Vizina A, Pech P (2013) Evaluation of simple statistical downscaling methods for monthly regional climate model simulations with respect to the estimated changes in runoff in the Czech Republic. Water Resour Manag 27(15):5261–5279
Harbor JM (1994) A practical method for estimating the impact of land-use change on surface runoff, groundwater recharge and wetland hydrology. J Am Plann Assoc 60(1):95–108
Helton JC (1993) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 42(2):327–367
Holvoet K, van Griensven A, Seuntjens P, Vanrolleghem PA (2005) Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 30(8):518–526
Kanakoudis V, Tsitsifli S, Samaras P, Zouboulis A, Demetriou G (2011) Developing appropriate performance indicators for urban water distribution systems evaluation at Mediterranean countries. Water utility. Journal 1:31–40
Kumar S, Tiwari MK, Chatterjee C, Mishra A (2015) Reservoir inflow forecasting using ensemble models based on neural networks, wavelet analysis and bootstrap method. Water Resour Manag 29(13):4863–4883
Li H, Davis AP (2009) Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. J Environ Eng 135(8):567–576
Lim KJ, Engel BA, Muthukrishnan S, Harbor J (2006) Effects of initial abstraction and urbanization on estimated runoff using CN technology1. J Am Water Resour As 42(3):629–643
Liu, Y (2015) Improvement of simulating BMPs and LID practices in L-THIA-LID model. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Liu Y, Ahiablame LM, Bralts VF, Engel BA (2015a) Enhancing a rainfall-runoff model to assess the impacts of BMPs and LID practices on storm runoff. J Environ Manage 147:12–23. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.005
Liu Y, Bralts VF, Engel BA (2015b) Evaluating the effectiveness of management practices on hydrology and water quality at watershed scale with a rainfall-runoff model. Sci Total Environ 511:298–308. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.077
Liu Y, Cibin R, Bralts VF, Chaubey I, Bowling LC, Engel BA (2016a) Optimal selection and placement of BMPs and LID practices with a rainfall-runoff model. Environ Modell Softw 80:281–296
Liu Y, Theller LO, Pijanowski BC, Engel BA (2016b) Optimal selection and placement of green infrastructure to reduce impacts of land use change and climate change on hydrology and water quality: An application to the Trail Creek Watershed, Indiana. Sci Total Environ 553:149–163
Machado AR, Wendland E, Krause P (2016) Hydrologic simulation for water balance improvement in an outcrop area of the Guarani Aquifer system. Environ Process 3(1):19–38
Migliaccio KW, Chaubey I (2008) Spatial distributions and stochastic parameter influences on SWAT flow and sediment predictions. J Hydrol Eng 13(4):258–269
Muleta MK, Nicklow JW (2005) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. J Hydrol 306(1):127–145
Muthukrishnan S, Harbor J, Lim KJ, Engel BA (2006) Calibration of a simple rainfall-runoff model for long-term hydrological impact evaluation. Urisa-Washington Dc 18(2):35
Narsimlu B, Gosain AK, Chahar BR, Singh SK, Srivastava PK (2015) SWAT model calibration and uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction in the Kunwari River Basin, India, using sequential uncertainty fitting. Environ Process 2(1):79–95
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Services) (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical Release 55, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services
Patil A, Deng Z (2010) Analysis of uncertainty propagation through model parameters and structure. Water Sci Technol 62(6)):1230–1239
Reinelt LE, Horner RR (1995) Pollutant removal from stormwater runoff by palustrine wetlands based on comprehensive budgets. Ecol Eng 4(2):77–97
Sample, DJ, Heaney, JP, Wright, LT, Koustas, R (2001) Geographic information systems, decision support systems, and urban storm-water management. J Water Res Pl 127(3):155–161
Sharifi A, Dinpashoh Y (2014) Sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith reference crop evapotranspiration to climatic variables in Iran. Water Resour Manag 28(15):5465–5476
Sinclair Knight Merz Pty. Ltd (1999) Duck River stormwater management plan, Final, St Leonards, NSW
Sobol′ IM (1993) Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math Model Comput Exper 1(4):407–417
Sobol′ IM (2001) Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput Simulat 55:271–280
Sreekanth J, Datta B (2014) Stochastic and robust multi-objective optimal management of pumping from coastal aquifers under parameter uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 28(7):2005–2019
Strecker, EW, Quigley, MM, Urbonas, B, Jones, J (2004) Analyses of the expanded EPA/ASCE International BMP Database and potential implications for BMP design. Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah
Tang Z, Engel BA, Pijanowski BC, Lim KJ (2005) Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale. J Environ Manage 76(1):35–45
Tang T, Reed P, Wagener T, Van Werkhoven K (2006) Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 3:3333–3395
Tang Y, Reed P, Van Werkhoven K, Wagener T (2007) Advancing the identification and evaluation of distributed rainfall-runoff models using global sensitivity analysis. Water Resour Res 43:W06415. doi:10.1029/2006WR005813
Theodossiou N, Fotopoulou E (2015) Delineating well-head protection areas under conditions of hydrogeological uncertainty. A case-study application in northern Greece. Environ Process 2(1):113–122
Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2004) Fuzzy linear programming for problems of water allocation under uncertainty. European Water 7(8):25–37
Valdez MC, Adler I, Barrett M, Ochoa R, Pérez A (2016) The Water-Energy-Carbon Nexus: Optimising Rainwater Harvesting in Mexico City. Environ Process 3(2):307–323
Weeks, CR (1982) Pollution in urban runoff. In: Hart, B.T. (Ed.), Water quality management monitoring programs and diffuse runoff Water Studies Centre, Chisholm Institute of Technology and Australian Society of Limnology, Melbourne, pp. 121–140.
Wilson C, Weng Q (2010) Assessing surface water quality and its relation with urban land cover changes in the Lake Calumet Area, Greater Chicago. Environ Manage 45(5):1096–1111
Wright, TJ, Liu, Y, Carroll, NJ, Ahiablame, LM, Engel, BA (2016) Retrofitting LID practices into existing neighborhoods: Is it worth it? Environ Manage 57(4):856–867
Zhang Q, Qi T, Singh VP, Chen YD, Xiao M (2015) Regional Frequency Analysis of Droughts in China: A Multivariate Perspective. Water Resour Manag 29(6):1767–1787
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Chaubey, I., Bowling, L.C. et al. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the L-THIA-LID 2.1 Model. Water Resour Manage 30, 4927–4949 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1462-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1462-z