Skip to main content
Log in

Why Can’t You Just Follow the Rules? Volunteer Rule Breaking and Disruptive Behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the benefits volunteers offer nonprofit organizations are substantial, they can also cause problems for these groups. In an environment where people willingly donate their time and energy to a cause that they ostensibly support, why is disruptive behavior so common? This ethnographic study of volunteers at an animal shelter identifies the factors that lead to problematic behavior. The paper argues that disruptions occur when there is a mismatch between the needs of the volunteer and the needs of the organization and because of structural conditions that lead to uncertainty among volunteers. These findings shed light on volunteer behavior broadly and present the opportunity to address disruptive behavior. As a result, the benefits volunteers provide for an organization can be maximized.

Résumé

Même si les avantages que procurent les bénévoles aux organismes sans but lucratif sont importants, ils peuvent aussi leur causer des problèmes. Dans un environnement où des gens offrent volontairement leur temps et leur énergie au profit d’une cause qu’ils appuient ostensiblement, pourquoi les comportements perturbateurs sont-ils si fréquents? Cette étude ethnographique des bénévoles d’un refuge pour animaux cerne les facteurs à la source des dits comportements. L’article affirme que les perturbations ont lieu lorsqu’un écart existe entre les besoins du bénévole et ceux de l’organisme, et en raison des conditions structurelles provoquant l’incertitude au sein des bénévoles. Ces découvertes mettent à jour une vaste gamme de comportements et présentent des occasions de gérer les perturbations. Les avantages que procurent les bénévoles aux organismes pourront ainsi être optimisés.

Zusammenfassung

Während Ehrenamtliche gemeinnützigen Organisationen große Vorteile bringen, können sie auch Probleme schaffen. Warum kommt es so häufig zu störendem Verhalten in einem Umfeld, in dem Personen bereitwillig ihre Zeit und Energie für einen Zweck opfern, den sie scheinbar unterstützen? Diese ethnographische Studie zu Ehrenamtlichen in einem Tierheim ermittelt die Faktoren, die zu problematischen Verhaltensweisen führen. In der Abhandlung wird behauptet, dass es zu Störungen kommt, wenn die Bedürfnisse der Ehrenamtlichen und die der Organisation nicht übereinstimmen und wenn strukturelle Bedingungen zu Unsicherheiten bei den Ehrenamtlichen führen. Diese Ergebnisse geben Aufschluss über das Verhalten Ehrenamtlicher im Allgemeinen, und es bietet sich die Gelegenheit, störende Verhaltensweisen anzusprechen. Folglich können die Vorteile, die eine Organisation durch Ehrenamtliche hat, maximiert werden.

Resumen

Aunque los beneficios que los voluntarios ofrecen a las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro son sustanciales, también pueden causar problemas para estos grupos. En un entorno en el que la gente dona de manera voluntaria su tiempo y energía a una causa que apoyan ostensiblemente, ¿por qué el comportamiento conflictivo es tan común? El presente estudio etnográfico de voluntarios en un albergue para animales identifica los factores que llevan a un comportamiento problemático. El presente documento argumenta que los conflictos se producen cuando existe un desequilibrio entre las necesidades del voluntario y las necesidades de la organización y debido a las condiciones estructurales que llevan a la incertidumbre entre los voluntarios. Estos hallazgos arrojan luz sobre el comportamiento del voluntario en líneas generales y presentan la oportunidad de abordar el comportamiento conflictivo. Como resultado, los beneficios que los voluntarios proporcionan a una organización pueden ser maximizados.

摘要

尽管志愿者为非盈利组织带来很大的好处,但是他们还会为这些团队带来问题。在人员愿意捐赠时间和能力给表面支持事业的环境中,破坏性行为为何如此常见?本动物收容所的志愿者人种研究确定了导致问题行为的因素。本文表示,当志愿者需求和组织需求之间存在不匹配,同时结构条件导致志愿者之间的不确定性时,将出现破坏。这些调查结果揭示了广泛的志愿行为,带来解决破坏性行为的机会。由此,可以最大化志愿者为组织提供的好处。

ملخص

في حين فوائد المتطوعين للمنظمات الغير الربحية كبير، يمكنهم أيضا” أن يسببوا مشاكل لهذه المجموعات. في بيئة حيث يتبرع الأشخاص عن طيب خاطر بوقتهم وطاقتهم لسبب يدعمونه ظاهريا”، لماذا السلوك المضطرب شائع جدا؟ هذه الدراسة الإثنوغرافية للمتطوعين في مأوى للحيوانات تحدد العوامل التي تؤدي إلى سلوك مريب. يجادل البحث أن الإضطرابات تحدث عندما يكون هناك عدم تطابق بين إحتياجات المتطوعين وإحتياجات المنظمة وبسبب الظروف الهيكلية التي تؤدي إلى عدم اليقين بين المتطوعين. هذه النتائج تسلط الضوء على سلوك المتطوعين على نطاق واسع وتقدم الفرصة لمعالجة السلوك المضطرب. نتيجة لذلك، فإن فوائد المتطوعين للمنظمة يمكن إستخدامها أفضل إستخدام.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All names have been changed throughout this paper.

  2. When I initially asked Violet how one became “seasoned,” she said that a volunteer must go to site regularly for a period of 6 months or longer. I requested the additional training to walk big dogs after only 3 months, however, and was given a red pin immediately after. Thus, the volunteer designations do not necessarily reflect the amount of time one spends at the site. Rather, it appears to symbolize the level of trust the paid staff has in a volunteer and thus became a useful indicator of how engaged a volunteer was.

References

  • Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Bailey, C. (2015). Enhancing volunteer engagement to achieve desirable outcomes: What can non-profit employers do? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–23.

  • Barley, S. R., & Gideon, K. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, S. D., Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (2008). The influence of age on volunteer contributions in a nonprofit organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(3), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinman, M. J., & Wandersman, A. (1999). The benefits and costs of volunteering in community organizations: Review and practical implications. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(1), 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R. A., & Park, S. (2016). The multifaceted nature of civic participation: A literature review. Voluntaristics Review, 1(1), 1–73.

  • Doherty, A., & Hoye, R. (2011). Role ambiguity and volunteer board member performance in nonprofit sport organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare’s end. Princeton University Press.

  • Ellis, S. J., & Noyes, K. H. (1990). By the people: A history of Americans as volunteers. Jossey-Bass.

  • Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (2001). Changing the focus on volunteering: An investigation of volunteers’ multiple contributions to a charitable organization. Journal of Management, 27(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M. R., Proenca, J. F., & Proenca, T. (2009). Motivations and management factors of volunteer work in nonprofit organisations: a literature review. In 8th International Congress of the International Association on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. 8th International of the International Association on Public and Nonprofit Marketing.

  • Garner, J. T., & Garner, L. T. (2010). Volunteering an opinion: Organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector, Quarterly, 40(5), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, M. A. (2004). Volunteer management capacity in America’s charities and congregations: A briefing report.

  • Haski-Leventhal, D. (2009). Altruism and volunteerism: The perceptions of altruism in four disciplines and their impact on the study of volunteerism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(3), 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. (2005). The civil society sector: A review of critical issues and research agenda for organizational communication scholars. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 238–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, J. (2000). Ambiguity: Exploring the complexity of roles and boundaries when working with volunteers in well woman clinics. Social Science and Medicine, 51(1), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile.

  • Neyland, D. (2007). Organizational ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. L. (1993). Volunteers: The organizational behavior of unpaid workers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shye, S. (2010). The motivation to volunteer: A systemic quality of life theory. Social Indicators Research, 98(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studer, S. (2015). Volunteer management: Responding to the uniqueness of volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1–27.

  • Studer, S., & von Schnurbein, G. (2013). Organizational factors affecting volunteers: A literature review on volunteer coordination. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(2), 403–440.

  • Thompson, W. E. (1983). Hanging tongues: A sociological encounter with the assembly line. Qualitative Sociology, 6, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 622–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 215–240.

  • Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Rebecca Jean Emigh, Rennie Lee, Corey O’Malley, Kevin Shih, Isaac Speer, and Marie Berry for their multiple reviews and helpful comments. I would also like to thank Gail Kligman for her guidance during the early stages of data collection, as well as the editors of Voluntas and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Molly S. Jacobs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, M.S. Why Can’t You Just Follow the Rules? Volunteer Rule Breaking and Disruptive Behavior. Voluntas 28, 26–43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9784-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9784-2

Keywords

Navigation