Skip to main content
Log in

The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation leads to more accurate GFR estimation in Chinese patients with CKD

  • Nephrology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Nephrology – Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 28 December 2016

Abstract

Objective

To verify whether the new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation improved the performance of original one in determining GFR in Chinese patients with CKD.

Method

A well-designed paired cohort was set up. Measured GFR (mGFR) was the result of 99mTc-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method. The estimated GFR (eGFR) was the result of the CKD-EPI equation (eGFR1) and the new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation (eGFR2). The comparisons were performed to evaluate the superiority of the eGFR2 in bias, accuracy, precision, concordance correlation coefficient and the slope of regression equation and measure agreement.

Results

A total of 195 patients were enrolled and analyzed. The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation improved the performance of the original one in bias and accuracy. However, nearly identical performance was observed in the respect of precision, concordance correlation coefficient, slope of eGFR against mGFR and 95 % limit of agreement. In the subgroup of GFR < 60 mL min−1/1.73 m2, the bias of eGFR1 was less than eGFR2 but they have comparable precision and accuracy. In the subgroup of GFR > 60 mL min−1/1.73 m2, eGFR2 performed better than eGFR1 in terms of bias and accuracy.

Conclusion

The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation can lead to more accurate GFR estimation in Chinese patients with CKD in general practice, especially in the higher GFR group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levey AS, Atkins R, Coresh J, Cohen EP, Collins AJ, Eckardt KU et al (2007) Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives—a position statement from kidney disease improving global outcomes. Kidney Int 72:247–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim NH, Hyun YY, Lee KB, Chang Y, Ryu S et al (2015) Environmental heavy metal exposure and chronic kidney disease in the general population. J Korean Med Sci 30(3):272–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Q-L, Rothenbacher D (2008) Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in population-based studies: systematic review. BMC Public Health 8:117

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaze FF, Meto DT, Halle MP, Ngogang J, Kengne AP (2015) Prevalence and determinants of chronic kidney disease in rural and urban Cameroonians: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 30(16):117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jessani S, Bux R, Jafar TH (2014) Prevalence, determinants, and management of chronic kidney disease in Karachi, Pakistan—a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 15:90

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CK, Swinford RD, Cerda RD, Portman RJ, Hwang W et al (2012) Evaluation of serum creatinine concentration-based glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease. Pharmacotherapy 32(7):642–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lujambio I, Sottolano M, Luzardo L, Robaina S, Krul N et al (2014) Estimation of glomerular filtration rate based on serum cystatin C versus creatinine in a Uruguayan population. Int J Nephrol 2014:837106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopez-Giacoman S, Madero M (2015) Biomarkers in chronic kidney disease, from kidney function to kidney damage. World J Nephrol 4(1):57–73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Levey AS, Coresh J (2012) Chronic kidney disease. Lancet 379:165–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16(1):31–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N et al (1999) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 130(6):461–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Gan X, Chen J, Lv L, Li M et al (2014) A new modified CKD-EPI equation for Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 9(10):e109743

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF et al (2009) CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150(9):604–612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson A, Malm J, Grubb A, Hansson LO (2004) Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL/min from plasma cystatin C values in mg/L. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 64(1):25–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grubb A, Nyman U, Björk J, Lindström V, Rippe B et al (2005) Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for GFR compared with the MDRD prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan–Barratt prediction equations for children. Clin Chem 51(8):1420–1431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gates GF (1982) Glomerular filtration rate: estimation from fractional renal accumulation of 99 Tcm-DTPA (stannous). Am J Roentgenol 138(3):565–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen J, Tang H, Huang H, Lv L, Wang Y, Liu X et al (2015) Development and validation of new glomerular filtration rate predicting models for Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Transl Med 13:317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie P, Huang JM, Lin HY, Wu WJ, Pan LP (2013) CKD-EPI equation may be the most proper formula based on creatinine in determining glomerular filtration rate in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol 45(4):1057–1064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Zhang YL, Beck GJ et al (2010) Comparative performance of the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 ml min−1 1.73 m−2. Am J Kidney Dis 56(3):486–495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. White CA, Akbari A, Doucette S, Fergusson D, Knoll GA (2010) Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: is the new chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation any better? Clin Chem 56(3):474–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pei XH, He J, Liu Q, Zhu B, Bao LH et al (2012) Evaluation of serum creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a Chinese population. Scand J Urol Nephrol 46(3):223–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kilbride HS, Stevens PE, Eaglestone G, Knight S, Carter JL, Delaney MP et al (2013) Accuracy of the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) study and CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) equations for estimation of GFR in the elderly. Am J Kidney Dis 61(1):57–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hebert SA, Molony DA (2015) ACP Journal Club: the CKD-EPI equation for eGFR predicted adverse outcomes after PCI better than other equations. Ann Intern Med 163(10):JC12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stevens LA, Claybon MA, Schmid CH, Chen J, Horio M et al (2011) Evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation or estimating the glomerular filtration rate in multiple ethnicities. Kidney Int 79:555–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie P, Huang J-M, Liu X-M, Wu W-J, Pan L-P et al (2013) 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method may be unsuitable to be used as the reference method in investigating the validity of CKD-EPI equation for determining glomerular filtration rate. PLoS One 8(5):e62328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH (1978) Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children and adults. J Pediatr 93(1):62–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Banfi G, Del Fabbro M, Lippi G (2006) Relation between serum creatinine and body mass index in elite athletes of different sport disciplines. Br J Sports Med 40:675–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Baxmann AC, Ahmed MS, Marques NC, Menon VB, Pereira AB, Kirsztajn GM et al (2008) Influence of muscle mass and physical activity on serum and urinary creatinine and serum cystatin C. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:348–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

YQ Provided and used the software.PX and JMH conceived and designed the experiments. PX, JMH, ZF, LGW, PF and LPP performed the experiments. PX and JMH analyzed the data. PX, JMH and YQ contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. PX and JMH Wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Xie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Additional information

This paper was partially supported by training and basic fund of clinical medicine provided by Finance Department of Hebei Province (2016).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Xie, P., Huang, Jm. et al. The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation leads to more accurate GFR estimation in Chinese patients with CKD. Int Urol Nephrol 48, 2077–2081 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1386-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1386-9

Keywords

Navigation