Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Subjective Poverty and Its Relation to Objective Poverty Concepts in Hungary

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper analyzes subjective poverty in Hungary and compares it to the objective poverty concepts. Subjective poverty is defined by examining who people consider to be poor. Based on the Easterlin paradox, the initial hypothesis states that subjective and absolute poverty concepts are highly correlated. Taking into account that Hungary is a developed country, subjective well-being is supposed to be associated not only with absolute, but also with relative deprivation. The methods of systematic data collection are used to collect data about the belief of the population. The paper concludes that low income level, Roma descent, entitlement to social supports and unemployment are the items thought to be most related to poverty by the informants. It proves that subjective poverty is a multidimensional concept. It also concludes that absolute and relative poverty thresholds coincide with the subjective one. It implies that increasing the absolute income level of individuals may not be enough to improve their subjective wellbeing as they are also concerned with their relative income position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agell, J., & Lundborg, P. (2003). Survey evidence on wage rigidity and unemployment: Sweden in the 1990s. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, A. M., Yemtsov, R., et al. (2005). Growth, poverty and inequality: Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R. L., Molina, D. J., & Slottje, D. J. (1988). A note on measuring Veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 531–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. S. (1983). Requiem for the omniscient informant: There’s life in the old girl yet. In J. Dougherty (Ed.), Directions in cognitive anthropology. Hillsdale, NJ: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2007). Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods. Economica, 74, 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castilla, C. (2009). Objective versus subjective poverty: Are income positional concerns influencing subjective poverty assessments? Midwest international economic development conference, Minneapolis.

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Munck, V. C., & Sobo, E. J. (1998). Using methods in the field: A practical introduction and casebook. Walnut Creek (CA), London, New Delhi: Altamira Press, A Division of Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 27, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., & Shilpi, F. (2008). Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption. Journal of Development Economics, 86, 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedűs, P., & Monostori, J. (2005). A szegénység és a társadalmi kirekesztődés mérőszámai 2005, Elméleti megalapozás. Budapest: KSH Népességtudományi Kutató Intézet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2006). Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laeken indicators—Detailed calculation methodology (2003). Statistics on income, poverty and social exclusion. European Commission, Eurostat, Working Group.

  • Layard, R. (2002). Rethinking public economics: Implications of rivalry and habit. (mimeograph).

  • Létminimum 2007. (2008). Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.

  • Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. (2009). Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D., & Postlewait, A. (1998). Relative income concerns and the rise in married women’s employment. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2002). Self-rated economic welfare in Russia. European Economic Review, 46, 1453–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. M. (1964). The self-management of cultures. In W. H. Goodenough (Ed.), Explorations in cultural anthropology (pp. 433–454). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, New Series, 88, 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and subjective well-being: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35, 459–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spéder, Z. S. (2002). A szegénység változó arcai: Tények és értelmezések. Budapest: Andorka Rudolf Társadalomtudományi Társaság; Századvég.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vajda, Z. S. (1999). Somlai Péter: Szocializáció. Szociológiai Szemle, 2, 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. M. S. (1971). The welfare function of income in Belgium: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 2, 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C. (1984). Consistency and consensus among informants: Disease concepts in a rural Mexican village. American Anthropologist, 86, 966–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C. (2007). Cultural consensus theory: Applications and frequently asked questions. Field Methods, 19, 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic data collection. Qualitative research methods (Vol. 10). Sage Publications.

  • Hungarian Census database. www.nepszamlalas.hu.

  • Eurostat database http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu.

  • Hungarian Central Statistical Office website. www.ksh.hu.

  • Hungarian National Bank website. www.mnb.hu.

  • 7 § 224/2006 (XI. 20.) Governmental regulation and 6 § of 329/2006. (XII. 23.) governmental regulation Act III of 1993 in Hungary on Social Administration and Social Transfers.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary

    Eszter Siposné Nándori

Authors
  1. Eszter Siposné Nándori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eszter Siposné Nándori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siposné Nándori, E. Subjective Poverty and Its Relation to Objective Poverty Concepts in Hungary. Soc Indic Res 102, 537–556 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9743-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9743-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation